中国管理科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2): 1-13.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.0337cstr: 32146.14.j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.0337
• 论文 • 下一篇
刘志东, 赵致远
收稿日期:2020-03-03
修回日期:2020-05-25
出版日期:2022-02-20
发布日期:2022-02-20
通讯作者:
February,2022
E-mail:liu_phd@163.com
基金资助:LIU Zhi-dong, ZHAO Zhi-yuan
Received:2020-03-03
Revised:2020-05-25
Online:2022-02-20
Published:2022-02-20
Contact:
刘志东(1973-),男(汉族),内蒙古赤峰人,中央财经大学管理科学与工程学院,博士,教授,博士研究生导师,研究方向:金融工程与金融计量,Email:liu_phd@163.com.
E-mail:liu_phd@163.com
Supported by:摘要: 指令驱动市场中,交易者对委托指令的提交和撤销往往表现出非平稳性和集聚性特征。量化评价限价指令簿事件间的激励关系,是探究限价指令簿动态演化的基础,指导交易者行为决策的重要参照。本文利用我国股票逐单委托数据重建了实时演化的限价指令簿,基于状态依赖Hawkes过程分析了不同市场状态下各类限价指令簿事件的自激励和互激励效应。共采用三种不同设定的状态依赖Hawkes过程模型进行实证分析,并探讨了我国股市中交易者的行为特征。实证结果表明,总体上我国股市中限价指令簿事件的自激励效应强于互激励效应,且不同市场状态下存在显著差异。激进事件所产生的互激励效应更为强烈,通过激进程度划分事件类型更能反映事件冲击和交易者的信息学习行为。
中图分类号:
刘志东,赵致远. 基于状态依赖Hawkes过程的我国股市限价指令簿事件激励效应研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(2): 1-13.
LIU Zhi-dong,ZHAO Zhi-yuan. Research on Excitation Effect among Limit Order Book Events in Chinese Stock Market Based on State-dependent Hawkes Processes[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(2): 1-13.
| [1] Gould M D, Porter M A, Williams S, et al. Limit order books[J]. Quantitative Finance, 2013, 13(11): 1709-1742. [2] 刘祥东,刘澄,刘善存,等.羊群行为加剧股票价格波动吗?[J].系统工程理论与实践, 2014, 34(6): 1361-1368.Liu Xiangdong, Liu Chen, Liu Shancun, et al. Does herd behavior increase stock price volatility?[J]. Systems Engineering—Theory&Practice,2014, 34(6): 1361-1368. [3] 郑丰,赵文耀,张蜀林.基于Agent的羊群行为研究[J].中国管理科学,2015,23(S1):424-429.Zheng Feng, Zhao Wenyao, Zhang Shulin. A study of herd behavior and market volatility based on agent-based modeling[J].ChineseJournalof ManagementScience, 2015,23(S1):424-429. [4] 朱菲菲,李惠璇,徐建国,等. 短期羊群行为的影响因素与价格效应——基于高频数据的实证检验[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 469(7): 191-206.Zhu Feifei, Liu Huixuan, Xu Jianguo, et al. Determinants and Pricing Effects of Short一term Herd Behavior:An Empirical Test Based on High一Frequency Data[J]. JournalofFinancialResearchinChina,2019, 469(7): 191-206. [5] Eisler Z, Bouchaud J P, Kockelkoren J. The price impact of order book events: market orders, limit orders and cancellations[J]. Quantitative Finance, 2012, 12(9): 1395-1419. [6] Van Ness B F, Van Ness R A, Watson E D. Canceling liquidity[J]. Journal of Financial Research, 2015, 38(1): 3-33. [7] Large J. Measuring the resiliency of an electronic limit order book[J]. Journal of Financial Markets, 2007, 10(1): 1-25. [8] Bacry E, Muzy J F. First-and second-order statistics characterization of Hawkes processes and non-parametric estimation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2016, 62(4): 2184-2202. [9] Lu X, Abergel F. High-dimensional Hawkes processes for limit order books: Modelling, empirical analysis and numerical calibration[J]. Quantitative Finance, 2018, 18(2): 249-264. [10] Muni Toke I, Pomponio F. Modelling trades-through in a limited order book using Hawkesprocesses[J].Economics,2012,6(1):2012 -22. [11] Gonzalez F, Schervish M. Instantaneous order impact and high-frequency strategy optimization in limit order books[J]. Market Microstructure and Liquidity, 2017, 3(02): 1850001. [12] 沈红波,曹军,王雅莉. 中国股票市场限价指令簿的信息含量研究[J]. 投资研究, 2012, 31(9): 113-126.Shen Hongbo, Cao Jun, Wang Yali. Research on the information content of limit order book in Chinese stock market[J]. Review of Investment Studies, 2012, 31(9): 113-126. [13] 刘红忠,叶军. 限价指令簿的价格发现功能[J]. 复旦学报(社会科学版),2012(2):41-48.Liu Hongzhong, Ye Jun. The price discovery of the limit order book[J]. Fudan Journal(Social Sciences),2012(2):41-48. [14] 许启发,蔡超,蒋翠侠.指令不均衡与股票收益关系研究——基于大规模数据分位数回归的实证[J].中国管理科学,2016,24(12):20-29.Xu Qifa, Cai Chao, Jiang Cuixia.An analysis of the relationship between order imbalance and stock returns through quantile regression approach for large-scale data[J].ChineseJournalof ManagementScience,2016,24(12):20-29. [15] Wu P, Rambaldi M, Muzy J F, et al. Queue-reactive Hawkes models for the order flow[J]. Working Paper, UniversitéParis-Dauphine, 2019. [16] Huang W, Lehalle C A, Rosenbaum M. Simulating and analyzing order book data: The queue-reactive model[J]. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2015, 110(509): 107-122. [17] 周平,马景义,张辛连. 限价指令簿与股票价格:信息扩散与动态反馈机制——来自沪深两市高频数据的证据[J]. 投资研究,2016,35(9):41-54.Zhou Ping, Ma Jingyi, Zhang Xinlian. Limit book and stock price: Information diffusion and dynamic feedback mechanism—evidence from high-frequency data of Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets[J]. Review of Investment Studies,2016,35(9):41-54. [18] Morariu-Patrichi M, Pakkanen M S. Hybrid marked point processes: Characterisation, existence and uniqueness[R]. Working Paper,Imperial College London, 2018. [19] Morariu-PatrichiM, Pakkanen M S. State-dependent Hawkes processes and their application to limit order book modelling[R]. Working Paper,Imperial College London, 2018. [20] 瞿慧,周慧.引入跳跃与联跳强度的沪深300股指期货套期保值研究[J].中国管理科学, 2016, 24(S1): 454-460.Qu Hui, Zhou Hui.Including jump and co-jump intensities to improve the dynamic hedging of CSI 300 index futures[J]. ChineseJournalof ManagementScience,2016, 24(S1): 454-460. [21] 刘志东,郑雪飞.基于Hawkes因子模型的股价共同跳跃研究[J].中国管理科学,2018,26(7):18-31.Liu Zhidong, Zheng Xuefei. A study of stock price co-jumps with Hawkes factor model[J].Chinese Journal of Management Science,2018,26(7):18-31. [22] 汪冬华,张裕恒.基于Hawkes过程中美股市大幅波动互激效应的研究[J].中国管理科学, 2018, 26(7): 32-39.Wang Donghua, Zhang Yuheng. Research on large volatility mutually exciting effect of Chinese and American stock markets based on Hawkes process[J].ChineseJournalof ManagementScience,2018, 26(7): 32-39. [23] Ozaki T. Maximum likelihood estimation of hawkes’ self-exciting point processes[J]. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 1979, 31(1): 145-155. [24] Daley D J, Vere-Jones D. An introduction to the theory of point processes[M]. Second edition, New York: Springer, 2003. [25] Hendricks D, Gebbie T, Wilcox D. Detecting intraday financial market states using temporal clustering[J]. Quantitative Finance, 2016, 16(11): 1657-1678. [26] Cartea , Jaimungal S. Incorporating order-flow into optimal execution[J]. Mathematics and Financial Economics, 2016, 10(3): 339-36 [27] Hendricks D. An online adaptive learning algorithm for optimal trade execution in high-frequency markets[D]. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand, 2016. |
| [1] | 罗鹏飞, 姚彦铭, 谭英贤. 突发公共卫生事件下企业委托代理问题与最优资本结构[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(10): 47-56. |
| [2] | 叶彦艺, 杨晓光. 股票市场知情交易如何影响信用债利差[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(9): 1-10. |
| [3] | 甘柳, 蔡颖俐, 徐明玉, 谭英贤. 二级债券市场信息获取与可转债融资[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(9): 22-32. |
| [4] | 姚银红, 王晓旭, 陈炜, 陈振松. 基于Transformer-LSTM分位数回归的全球股市极端风险溢出研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(8): 1-13. |
| [5] | 吴伟平, 林雨, 金成能, 唐振鹏. 随机市场深度下基于风险管理和交易约束的最优执行问题[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(8): 14-25. |
| [6] | 颜镜洲, 李仲飞, 毛杰, 李星毅. 模糊波动下的策略交易和市场质量[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(8): 26-36. |
| [7] | 张维, 陈卓, 冯绪, 熊熊, 张永杰. 金融系统工程在中国:2010-2024[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(7): 11-23. |
| [8] | 田军, 董赞强, 李雅丽. 基于预付账款融资模式的供应链融资策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(7): 272-283. |
| [9] | 罗鹏飞, 刘新乐, 陆婷, 张勇. 碳减排下的企业并购决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(7): 337-345. |
| [10] | 杨科, 刘鑫, 田凤平. 中国与其他主要新兴市场国家间股市极端风险的跨市场传染[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(7): 44-53. |
| [11] | 文璐, 冯玲. 动态政府干预下银行风险传染与最优救助决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(6): 37-48. |
| [12] | 欧阳资生, 周学伟. 中国金融机构系统性风险回测与关联研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(6): 14-26. |
| [13] | 赵志明, 潘琼. 债权激励对公司再融资的影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(6): 27-36. |
| [14] | 谭春萍, 秦学志, 尚勤, 王文华, 林先伟. 企业财务困境的激励相容式组合纾解策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(5): 13-25. |
| [15] | 于辉, 王霜. 供应链金融:企业如何实现“鱼与熊掌”兼得?[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(5): 280-289. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
|
||