基于MFXDMA方法的加密货币和中国股市间的多重分形交叉相关性研究

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.0402

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 加密货币这一新兴的金融市场目前引起了学者的广泛关注。本文主要基于多重分形降趋移动平均交叉相关分析法(MFXDMA)，以4类加密货币(比特币、以太坊、瑞波币和莱特币)、上证指数和恒生指数为研究对象，实证分析了加密货币单一市场、交叉市场间收益率的多重分形特征，以及加密货币和上证指数、恒生指数交叉相关性的多重分形特征。实证结果表明，比特币、以太坊、瑞波币和莱特币各单独市场的收益率具有长记忆性、非对称的多重分形特征。4个加密货币市场中以太坊的市场效率最强，而比特币的市场效率最弱。加密货币市场对内地股市和香港股市产生了一定影响，市场间的交叉相关持续性增强。通过对比特币、比特币和以太坊交叉市场采用中心和前向移动平均法进行对比分析，实验表明本文使用后向移动平均法的结果是稳健的。最后通过滑动窗技术，研究了单一市场和跨市场相关性、波动函数的时变特征，结果表明比特币和以太坊，上证指数和恒生指数时变特征具有一定的相似性，并且上证指数比恒生指数更易受加密货币市场的影响。

关键词: 加密货币；多重分形；移动平均；交叉相关性

Abstract: Cryptocurrency, an emerging financial market, has attracted extensive attention of scholars. The traditional research on cryptocurrency is often limited to the cryptocurrency market, and the research on the correlation between cryptocurrency and China’s stock market is relatively lacking.Based on the multifractal moving average cross-correlation analysis (MFXDMA), four types of cryptocurrencies (Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ripple and Litecoin), Shanghai Stock Exchange Index and Hang Seng Index are taken as the research objects, empirically analyzes the multifractal characteristics of the returns between the cryptocurrency single market and cross-market, and at the same time the multifractal characteristics of the cross-correlation of cryptocurrencies and the Shanghai Stock Index and the Hang Seng Index is focused on. The empirical results show that the returns of the individual markets of Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ripple, and Litecoin have long-term memory, asymmetric multifractal characteristics. Among the four cryptocurrencies markets, Ethereum is the most efficient, while Bitcoin is the least efficient. The cryptocurrency market has had a certain impact on the mainland stock market and Hong Kong stock market, and the cross-correlation between the markets has been strengthened, it also shows the asymmetrical multifractal characteristics.In the empirical analysis of the correlation between Bitcoin and China’s stock market, The MFXDMA method is compared with the commonly used MFXDFA and MFSMXA multifractal methods, and it is found that MFXDMA and MFSMXA have achieved similar results.By comparing and analyzing the cross-market of Bitcoin, Bitcoin, and Ethereum using the central and forward moving average method, experiments show that the results of this paper using the backward moving average are robust. Finally, the time-varying characteristics of single market and cross-market correlation and volatility function are studied by using sliding window technology. The results show that Bitcoin and Ethereum, Shanghai Stock Exchange Index and Hang Seng index have certain similarity in time-varying characteristics, and Shanghai Stock Exchange Index is more susceptible to the impact of cryptocurrency market than Hang Seng Index. The correlation between cryptocurrency and China’s stock market is studied, which is of great significance for the risk aversion of China’s stock market. It can be used as a reference for the cross-market portfolio research of cryptocurrency and China’s stock market and the financial risk supervision of relevant departments.

Key words: cryptocurrency; multifractal; moving average; cross-correlation

中图分类号:

F830

谢文浩,曹广喜. 基于MFXDMA方法的加密货币和中国股市间的多重分形交叉相关性研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(10): 72-84.

XIE Wen-hao,CAO Guang-xi. Multifractal Cross-Correlation between Cryptocurrency and Chinese Stock Market Based on MFXDMA Method[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(10): 72-84.

参考文献

［1］谢平,石午光.数字加密货币研究:一个文献综述［J］.金融研究,2015,429(1):1-15.Xie Ping,Shi Wuguang. A literature review of cryptocurrency［J］. Journal of Financial Research, 2015,429(1): 1-15.
［2］ Katsiampa P, Corbet S, Lucey B. Volatility spillover effects in leading cryptocurrencies: A BEKK-MGARCH analysis［J］. Finance Research Letters, 2019, 29: 68-74.
［3］ Koutmos D. Return and volatility spillovers among cryptocurrencies［J］. Economics Letters, 2018, 173: 122-127.
［4］ Corbet S, Meegan A, Larkin C, et al. Exploring the dynamic relationships between cryptocurrencies and other financial assets［J］. Economics Letters, 2018, 165: 28-34.
［5］ Gil-Alana L A, Abakah E J A, Rojo M F R. Cryptocurrencies and stock market indices. Are they related?［J］. Research in International Business and Finance, 2020, 51: 101063.
［6］ Kristjanpoller W, Bouri E, Takaishi T. Cryptocurrencies and equity funds: Evidence from an asymmetric multifractal analysis［J］. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2020,545: 123711.
［7］ Ferreira P, Kristoufek L, Pereira E J A L. DCCA and DMCA correlations of cryptocurrency markets［J］. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2020,545: 123803.
［8］ Urquhart A. Price clustering in Bitcoin［J］. Economics letters, 2017, 159: 145-148.
［9］ Bouri E, Gil-Alana L A, Gupta R, et al. Modelling long memory volatility in the Bitcoin market: Evidence of persistence and structural breaks［J］. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 2019, 24(1): 412-426.
［10］ Lahmiri S, Bekiros S. Chaos, randomness and multi-fractality in Bitcoin market［J］. Chaos, solitons & fractals, 2018, 106: 28-34.
［11］ Urquhart A. The inefficiency of Bitcoin［J］. Economics Letters, 2016, 148: 80-82.
［12］ Jiang Yonghong, Nie He, RuanWeihua. Time-varying long-term memory in Bitcoin market［J］. Finance Research Letters, 2018, 25: 280-284.
［13］ Caporale G M, Zekokh T. Modelling volatility of cryptocurrencies using Markov-Switching GARCH models［J］. Research in International Business and Finance, 2019, 48: 143-155.
［14］ Cheah E T, Fry J. Speculative bubbles in Bitcoin markets? An empirical investigation into the fundamental value of Bitcoin［J］. Economics Letters, 2015, 130: 32-36.
［15］ Jakub B. Does Bitcoin follow the hypothesis of efficient market?［J］. International Journal of Economic Sciences, 2015, 4(2): 10-23.
［16］ Kurihara Y, Fukushima A. The market efficiency of Bitcoin: A weekly anomaly perspective［J］. Journal of Applied Finance and Banking, 2017, 7(3): 57-64.
［17］ Gajardo G, Kristjanpoller W D, Minutolo M. Does Bitcoin exhibit the same asymmetric multifractal cross-correlations with crude oil, gold and DJIA as the Euro, Great British Pound and Yen?［J］. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 2018, 109: 195-205.
［18］ Al-Yahyaee K H, Mensi W, Yoon S M. Efficiency, multifractality, and the long-memory property of the Bitcoin market: A comparative analysis with stock, currency, and gold markets［J］. Finance Research Letters, 2018, 27: 228-234.
［19］ Jiang Zhiqiang, Zhou Weixing. Multifractal detrending moving-average cross-correlation analysis［J］. Physical Review E, 2011, 84(1): 016106.
［20］周伟杰,党耀国,顾荣宝.基于灰色算子的分形法及应用［J］.中国管理科学,2017,25(10):89-99.Zhou Weijie, Dang Yaoguo, Gu Rongbao. The modified fractal methods based on the grey operator and their application［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017, 25(10): 89-99.
［21］ Wang Jing, Shang Pengjian, Ge Weijie. Multifractalcross-correlation analysis based on statistical moments［J］. Fractals, 2012, 20: 271-279.
［22］祁明,肖林.虚拟货币:运行机制、交易体系与治理策略［J］.中国工业经济,2014(4):110-122.Qi Ming, Xiao Lin. Network virtual currency: Operation mechanism, trading system and governance strategy［J］. China Industrial Economics, 2014(4):110-122.
［23］姚前.共识规则下的货币演化逻辑与法定数字货币的人工智能发行［J］.金融研究,2018,432(9):37-55.Yao Qian. Currency evolution logic under consensus mechanism and digital fiat currency issuance based on artificial intelligence［J］. Journal of Financial Research, 2018,432(9): 37-55.
［24］刘刚,刘娟,唐婉容.比特币价格波动与虚拟货币风险防范——基于中美政策信息的事件研究法［J］.广东财经大学学报,2015,30(3):30-40.Liu Gang, Liu Juan, Tang Wanrong. Bitcoin price volatility and virtual currency risk control: An event study analysis based on the sino-us policy information［J］. Journal of Guangdong University of Finance and Economics, 2015, 30(3): 30-40.
［25］潘慧峰,蔡显军,孙伟,等.数字货币市场是否达到了弱式有效?——基于广义谱方法的检验［J］.科学决策,2019(5):1-13.Pan Huifeng, Cai Xianjun, Sun Wei, et al. Have cryptocurrency markets reached weak-form efficiency? A generalized spectral approach［J］. Scientific Decision Making, 2019(5): 1-13.
［26］邓伟.比特币价格泡沫:证据、原因与启示［J］.上海财经大学学报,2017,19(2):50-62.Deng Wei. Price bubbles in Bitcoin: Evidence,causes and implications［J］. Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, 2017, 19(2): 50-62.
［27］刘力臻,王庆龙.基于模仿传染模型的比特币羊群效应分析［J］.北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版),2015,17(2):27-33.Liu Lizhen,Wang Qinglong. Analysis of Bitcoin herd behavior based on imitation and infection model［J］.Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 17(2): 27-33.
［28］ Zunino L, Tabak B M, Figliola A, et al. A multifractal approach for stock market inefficiency［J］. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2008, 387(26): 6558-6566.
［29］ Wang Yudong, Liu Li, Gu Rongbao. Analysis of efficiency for Shenzhen stock market based on multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis［J］. International Review of Financial Analysis, 2009, 18(5): 271-276.

[1]	罗鹏飞, 姚彦铭, 谭英贤. 突发公共卫生事件下企业委托代理问题与最优资本结构[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(10): 47-56.
[2]	叶彦艺, 杨晓光. 股票市场知情交易如何影响信用债利差[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(9): 1-10.
[3]	甘柳, 蔡颖俐, 徐明玉, 谭英贤. 二级债券市场信息获取与可转债融资[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(9): 22-32.
[4]	姚银红, 王晓旭, 陈炜, 陈振松. 基于Transformer-LSTM分位数回归的全球股市极端风险溢出研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(8): 1-13.
[5]	吴伟平, 林雨, 金成能, 唐振鹏. 随机市场深度下基于风险管理和交易约束的最优执行问题[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(8): 14-25.
[6]	颜镜洲, 李仲飞, 毛杰, 李星毅. 模糊波动下的策略交易和市场质量[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(8): 26-36.
[7]	张维, 陈卓, 冯绪, 熊熊, 张永杰. 金融系统工程在中国：2010－2024[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(7): 11-23.
[8]	田军, 董赞强, 李雅丽. 基于预付账款融资模式的供应链融资策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(7): 272-283.
[9]	罗鹏飞, 刘新乐, 陆婷, 张勇. 碳减排下的企业并购决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(7): 337-345.
[10]	杨科, 刘鑫, 田凤平. 中国与其他主要新兴市场国家间股市极端风险的跨市场传染[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(7): 44-53.
[11]	文璐, 冯玲. 动态政府干预下银行风险传染与最优救助决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(6): 37-48.
[12]	欧阳资生, 周学伟. 中国金融机构系统性风险回测与关联研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(6): 14-26.
[13]	赵志明, 潘琼. 债权激励对公司再融资的影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(6): 27-36.
[14]	谭春萍, 秦学志, 尚勤, 王文华, 林先伟. 企业财务困境的激励相容式组合纾解策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(5): 13-25.
[15]	于辉, 王霜. 供应链金融：企业如何实现“鱼与熊掌”兼得？[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(5): 280-289.