主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

• •    

基于Hegselmann-Krause模型的人机协同决策动力学模型: AI对个体决策行为的影响探索

徐威, 徐选华, 王宗润, 赵程伟   

  1. 中南大学商学院, 湖南 410083 中国
    中南林业科技大学商学院, 湖南 410004 中国
  • 收稿日期:2025-11-07 修回日期:2026-09-01 接受日期:2026-09-16
  • 通讯作者: 徐选华
  • 基金资助:
    混合智能驱动的决策范式构建(72293574); 智能技术支持下韧性城市风险防控与管理决策(72091515); 人机混合智能驱动的新能源开发选址复杂异构多属性群决策方法研究(72301298)

Human-Machine Collaborative Decision-Making Dynamics Based on the Hegselmann-Krause Model: Exploring the Impact of AI on Individual Decision-Making Behavior

  1. , 410083, China
    , 410004, China
  • Received:2025-11-07 Revised:2026-09-01 Accepted:2026-09-16

摘要: 人工智能(AI)的快速发展与环境复杂性的增加暴露了传统观点演化模型在描述人机协同决策过程中的不足,同时,人机信任与机器推荐精度对决策行为及群体观点演化的影响机制尚未得到系统研究。针对上述问题,本文在Hegselmann–Krause(HK)模型基础上,结合个人社交网络结构、人机信任水平及机器推荐精度等关键因素,构建了人机协同决策动力学模型。在此框架下,通过数值模拟系统分析了不同信任结构与推荐精度条件下群体观点的演化规律。进一步地,本文对网络结构与机器推荐函数进行了拓展分析,验证了模型效应源于内在机制而非外部假设。最后,结合实际数据对模型进行了检验,结果表明该模型能够有效刻画人机协同环境下个体行为演化与群体共识形成的动态过程。研究结论为深入理解AI赋能下的人机协同机制及优化群体决策模式提供了理论支撑与方法参考。

关键词: 人机协同决策, 观点演化, Hegselmann-Krause模型, 人机信任, 机器推荐精度

Abstract: The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) and the increasing complexity of decision-making environments have revealed the limitations of traditional opinion dynamics models in characterizing human–machine collaborative decision-making processes. Meanwhile, the influence mechanisms of human–machine trust and algorithmic recommendation accuracy on individual decision behavior and collective opinion evolution remain insufficiently explored. To address these issues, this study extends the classical Hegselmann–Krause (HK) model by incorporating key factors such as individual social network structure, human–machine trust level, and recommendation accuracy, thereby constructing a dynamic model of human–machine collaborative decision-making. Within this framework, numerical simulations are conducted to systematically analyze the evolution patterns of group opinions under different trust structures and recommendation accuracies. Furthermore, the network topology and recommendation functions are extended to verify that the observed model effects arise from intrinsic mechanisms rather than external assumptions. Finally, empirical analyses based on real-world data demonstrate that the proposed model effectively captures the dynamic processes of individual behavioral evolution and collective consensus formation in human–AI collaborative contexts. The findings provide theoretical insights and methodological guidance for understanding AI-empowered human–machine collaboration and optimizing collective decision-making mechanisms.

Key words: Human–AI collaborative decision-making, Opinion evolution, Hegselmann–Krause model, Human–AI trust, Machine recommendation accuracy