主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

• •    

双重不确定性下企业ESG投入策略:竞争与信号效应

刘婧玲, 刘家国   

  1. 大连海事大学航运经济与管理学院, 116026
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-19 修回日期:2025-11-20 接受日期:2026-01-01
  • 通讯作者: 刘家国
  • 基金资助:
    辽宁省社会科学规划基金项目(L24CGL004)

Corporate ESG Investment Strategies under Dual Uncertainties: Competition and Signaling Effects

  1. , 116026,
  • Received:2024-12-19 Revised:2025-11-20 Accepted:2026-01-01

摘要: 在全球可持续发展的浪潮中,环境、社会和治理(ESG)已经成为企业发展的关键战略要素。鉴于当前经济环境的不确定性特征,以及企业ESG实践中竞争效应与信号效应间的互斥性导致的策略不确定性,本文采用全局博弈构建理论模型,探究环境不确定性和策略不确定性对企业ESG投入的影响路径及其组合效应。结果表明,与直觉不同,环境不确定性能够激发企业进行ESG投入;对企业策略不确定性的效应分解和路径分析发现,当竞争效应较小时,企业只要观察到足够大的收益信号就会进行ESG投入,而当竞争效应较大时,企业的ESG投入策略则取决于所需承担的成本水平,尤其当ESG提升成本处于中间水平时,企业的ESG投入激励随其获得的收益信念的提高先增后减再增,而ESG的信号效应始终对企业ESG投入激励具有正向的补偿作用,并且消费者学习会正向调节这种补偿效应;另外,政府对企业ESG投入的补贴会增加企业的ESG投入激励,制定过高的ESG标准则会产生相反的效果。本文的研究结论为政府制定有效的ESG激励机制以及企业开展ESG实践提供了重要的理论参考和实践指导。

关键词: ESG, 不确定性, 全局博弈, 竞争, 信号

Abstract: Amidst the global wave of sustainable development, Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) has emerged as a key strategic element for corporate growth. Considering the current economic environment's uncertainty and the strategic uncertainty caused by the mutual exclusivity between the competitive effect and the signaling effect of corporate ESG investments, this paper employs a global game theory model to examine the impact pathways and interactions of environmental uncertainty and strategic uncertainty on corporate ESG investment incentives. The results reveal that, contrary to intuition, environmental uncertainty helps promote corporate ESG investment. The decomposition and path analysis of the effects of strategic uncertainty on corporations show that when the competitive effect is relatively small, companies will invest in ESG as long as they observe a sufficiently high return signal. However, when the competitive effect is significant, a company’s ESG incentive depends on the size of the investment cost. Particularly, when the investment cost is at a medium level, the company's investment incentive fluctuates in an "N" shape as its return belief increases. Additionally, the signaling effect of ESG provides a constant compensatory role in corporate investment incentives, and consumer learning positively moderates this compensatory effect. Moreover, government subsidies for corporate ESG investments increase the incentive for companies to invest in ESG, while the establishment of higher environmental quality standards has the opposite effect. The conclusions of this study have significant theoretical and practical implications for the government in formulating effective ESG incentive mechanisms and related supporting policies.

Key words: ESG, Uncertainty, Global game, Competitive effect, Signal effect