主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

• •    

考虑投资成本共担和工艺竞争力的供应链产品质量决策研究——基于非合作-合作两型博弈方法

张义真, 李登峰   

  1. 电子科技大学, 611731
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-24 修回日期:2026-01-07 接受日期:2026-01-23
  • 通讯作者: 李登峰
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(72271046); 国家自然科学基金(72071032)

Supply Chain Product Quality Decisions Considering Investment Cost Sharing and Process Competitiveness--Based on Noncooperative-Cooperative Biform Game Approach

LI Deng-Feng   

  1. , 611731,
  • Received:2024-06-24 Revised:2026-01-07 Accepted:2026-01-23
  • Contact: Deng-Feng, LI
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(72271046); National Natural Science Foundation of China(72071032)

摘要: 考虑产品质量受零部件质量水平和制造商工艺竞争力的影响,针对由一个零部件供应商和一个制造商组成的供应链质量决策问题,本文通过构建非合作-合作两型博弈模型,可同时解决加工工艺水平、质量投资成本分担等策略优化和利润分配问题。在非合作博弈部分,零部件供应商和制造商进行Stackelberg博弈,其零部件批发价格、加工工艺水平和产品零售价形成竞争局势。而在合作博弈部分,零部件供应商和制造商合作优化零部件质量水平、质量投资成本分担比例;应用极小极大值定理和Shapley值,可得到任意竞争局势下供应链成员的利润分配。将利润分配值作为非合作博弈部分的支付函数,求解得到均衡策略和最优利润。通过理论分析和数值模拟说明,工艺创新能力因子等参数对均衡策略和最优利润的影响。研究结果表明:制造商工艺创新能力的提高有利于自身工艺水平和零部件质量水平的提升;制造商总是倾向于同零部件供应商合作,通过分担其质量投资成本,鼓励零部件供应商推动零部件质量的提升;围绕提高产品质量进行工艺水平的提升,对产品竞争力和企业利润有着积极影响;只有消费者重视产品质量,才能激励企业不断优化产品,实现企业资源的有效利用。研究成果可为企业如何通过开展竞争与合作提升供应链质量提供决策参考。

关键词: 产品质量, 质量投资成本共担, 工艺竞争力, 非合作-合作两型博弈

Abstract: As China’s economy enters the stage of high-quality development, the manufacturing industry is undergoing a critical period of transformation and upgrading. Driven by national policies and market demand, manufacturing enterprises are striving to enhance quality and efficiency to strengthen industrial competitiveness. The improvement of product quality relies, in part, on the supply of high-performance components. However, component suppliers often face high investment costs and significant risks in the process of quality improvement, which weakens their motivation to enhance quality. To address this issue, some manufacturing enterprises, such as Huawei, share investment costs with suppliers and jointly bear risks. Meanwhile, manufacturers' process competitiveness, including process capability and process innovation, also directly affects product quality and production efficiency. Given that product quality is influenced by both component quality levels and manufacturers' process competitiveness, and considering the price decisions and cost-sharing mechanisms between manufacturers and component suppliers, it is worth studying the optimization of strategies such as optimal pricing and optimal process level, as well as the issue of profit distribution. For the quality decision problem of the supply chain consisting of a component supplier and a manufacturer, this paper simultaneously solves the problems of strategy optimization and profit distribution by constructing a noncooperative-cooperative biform game model. First, in the non-cooperative game part, component supplier and manufacturer engage in a Stackelberg game, where their wholesale prices of components, processing levels and retail prices of products form a competitive situation. Second, in the cooperative game part, component supplier and manufacturer cooperate to optimize the component quality level and quality investment cost sharing ratio, applying the Maximin theory and the Shapley value to the profit distribution of supply chain members in any situation. Then, the profit distribution value is used as a payoff function for the non-cooperative game part to solve for the optimal equilibrium strategy and optimal profit. Finally, theoretical analysis and numerical simulation illustrate the effect of parameters such as process innovation capability factor on the equilibrium strategy and optimal profit. The research results show that the enhancement of the manufacturer’s process innovation capability is conducive to the improvement of its own process level and the quality level of components. Manufacturers always prefer to work with component suppliers to encourage them to drive component quality by sharing the cost of their quality investments. Process enhancement focused on improving product quality has a positive impact on product competitiveness and corporate profitability. Only consumers pay attention to product quality can motivate enterprises to continuously optimize their products and achieve effective use of enterprise resources. This research can provide a decision-making reference for enterprises on how to improve the quality of supply chain by conducting competition and cooperation.

Key words: product quality, quality investment cost-sharing, process competitiveness, noncooperative-cooperative biform game