主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
Articles

Universal Portfolio Strategy Based on Forecasting Price

Expand
  • 1. School of Business Administration, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China;
    2. Guangzhou Financial Services Innovation and Risk Management Research Base, Guangzhou 510641, China

Received date: 2016-09-29

  Revised date: 2018-01-11

  Online published: 2018-11-23

Abstract

Portfolio selection is a practical financial problem. It is mainly concerned with determining a strategy for allocating the wealth among a set of financial assets under an uncertain environment. Markowitz (1952) proposed the Mean-Variance Theory and pioneered the quantitative research methodology in portfolio selection. This approach assumes that investors have the ability to achieve full statistic information of prices, which, however, violates the real world. The strong statistic assumption determines this approach's poor performance in practical application. Following the Kelly investment model (1956), Cover (1991) proposed the on-line portfolio selection model, which has none statistic assumption of price. In this paper, the on-line portfolio selection is followed and the improved on-line strategies are studied.
An on-line portfolio selection problem based on the expected utility maximization and L1-median estimator is investigated in this paper. Considering the EG strategy estimate next price trend with only one-period price information which is not sufficient, the next price trend with multi-period price information is estimated and the performance of on-line strategy is improved.
Firstly, the Modified Weiszfed algorithm is applied to calculate the L1-median estimator of multi-period price. Based on the L1-median estimator, the estimation of future price trend is given by the ratio of L1-median estimator to close price. Then, via maximizing utility, a novel on-line strategy named EGLM (Exponential Gradient via L1-Median) is proposed. With portfolio vectors' distance defined by the relative entropy function, it is proved that EGLM is a universal portfolio. Therefore, as a universal portfolio, EGLM could achieve as much approximate return as BCRP. Meanwhile, by algorithm analyzing, it is found that EGLM's time complexity is O(mn)+O(Mn), which is linear with respect to m, number of securities, and is significant less that UP's O(nm). Thus, the proposed EGLM is suitable for real-world large-scale applications.Finally, based on 6 datasets from domestic and foreign real markets, an experiment is given to illustrate the usefulness and effectiveness of EGLM. The results show that EGLM has not only better performance of return but also better trade-off between return and risk than UP and EG.
With the proposed EGLM strategy and its linear time complexity, investors can gather more precise information about securities' prices and save more calculating time. EGLM has not only the universal character but also good performance in practical performance.

Cite this article

PENG Zi-jin, XU Wei-jun . Universal Portfolio Strategy Based on Forecasting Price[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018 , 26(9) : 1 -10 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2018.09.001

References

[1] Markowitz H. Portfolio selection[J]. The Journal of Finance, 1952, 7(1):77-91.

[2] Zhang Weiguo,Liu Yongjun, Xu Weijun. A possibilistic mean-semivariance-entropy model for multi-period portfolio selection with transaction costs[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2012, 222(2):341-349.

[3] Zhang Weiguo,Liu Yongjun, Xu Weijun. A new fuzzy programming approach for multi-period portfolio optimization with return demand and risk control[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2014, 246(1):107-126.

[4] Liu Yongjun, Zhang Weiguo,Xu Weijun. Fuzzy multi-period portfolio selection optimization models using multiple criteria[J]. Automatica, 2012, 48(12):3042-3053.

[5] 姚海祥, 李仲飞. 基于非参数估计框架的期望效用最大化最优投资组合[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(1):1-9.

[6] 张鹏, 张卫国, 张逸菲. 具有最小交易量限制的多阶段均值-半方差投资组合优化[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(7):11-17.

[7] 郭文英. 基于贝叶斯学习的动态投资组合选择[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(8):39-45.

[8] Kelly J L.Anew interpretation of information rate[J]. The Bell System Technical Journal, 1956, 35(4):917-926.

[9] Cover T M. Universal portfolio[J]. Mathematics Finance, 1991, 1(1):1-29.

[10] Cover T M, Ordentlich E. Universal portfolios with side information[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 1996, 42(2):348-363.

[11] Blum A, Kalai A. Universal portfolios with and without transaction costs[J]. Machine Learning, 1999, 35(3):193-205.

[12] Helmbold D P,Schapir R E, Singer Y, et al. A comparison of new and old algorithm for a mixture estimation problem[J]. Machine Learning, 1997, 27(1):97-119.

[13] Helmbold D P, Singer Y, Schapir R E, et al. On-line portfolio selection using multiplicative updates[J]. Mathematics Finance, 1998, 8(4):325-347.

[14] Li Bin, Hoi SCH, Sahoo D, et al.Moving average reversion strategy for on-line portfolio selection[J]. Artificial Intelligence, 2015, 222:104-123.

[15] Huang Dingjiang, Zhou Junlong, Li Bin, et al. Robust median reversion strategy for on-line portfolio selection[J]. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge & Data Engineering, 2016, 28(9):2480-2493.

[16] Vardi Y, Zhang Cunhui. The multivariate L1-median and associated data depth[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2000, 97(4):1423-1426.

[17] Borodin A, El-Yaniv R, Gogan V.Can we learn to beat the best stock?[J]. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2004, 21(1):579-594.

[18] 高丽. 在线投资组合策略及算法研究[D]. 广州:华南理工大学, 2013.

[19] Grinold R, Kahn R. Active portfolio management:A quantitative approach for producing superior returns and controlling risk[M]. New York:McGraw-Hill, 1999.
Outlines

/