Based on the characteristic of venture capital guiding fund, a performance assessment system of venture capital guiding fund is introduced in this paper. This assessment system consists of three aspects: policy effect, economic effect and management effect. Moreover, the Intuitionistic Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (IFAHP) is developed and incorporated into our assessment system. An analysis on one of Chengdu's venture capital guiding fund is conducted, and it is found that the indexes in our assessment system can well reflect the characteristic of venture capital guiding fund. Compared with traditional method of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP), the IFAHP can significantly improve the accuracy and reliability of assessment.
GU Jing, REN Pei-jia, XU Ze-shui
. Study on Spread Mechanism and Diffusion Effect of Network Public Opinion Crisis[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015
, 23(9)
: 124
-131
.
DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.09.015
[1] Audretsch D B, Thurik A R. What's new about the new economy? Sources of growth in the managed and entrepreneurial economies [J]. Industrial and corporate change, 2001, 10(1): 267-315.
[2] Bartzokas A, Mani S. Financial systems, corporate investment in innovation, and venture capital [M]. Cheltenham:Edward Elgar Publishing, 2004.
[3] Cumming D J.Agency costs, institutions, learning, and taxation in venture capital contracting [J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2005, 20(5): 573-622.
[4] Cumming D. Government policy towards entrepreneurial finance: Innovation investment funds [J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2007, 22(2): 193-235.
[5] Sheffield A. Overview of publicly-backed venture capital and loan funds in the UK . Working Paper,Capital for Enterprise, 2012.
[6] 李洪江, 鲍晓燕. 国外创业投资引导基金绩效的实证考察[J]. 软科学, 2012, 26(4): 58-62.
[7] 张勇. 创业投资引导基金运行机制研究. 天津:南开大学, 2012.
[8] 苏辛, 周勇. 条件自回归 expectile 模型及其在基金业绩评价中的应用[J]. 中国管理科学, 2013, 21(6): 22-29.
[9] 朱杰, 陈浪南. 基于状态空间模型的动态基金业绩评价研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2013, 21(6): 11-21.
[10] 周莉, 盛梦婷. 创业板中创业投资基金的投资效益分析[J]. 中央财经大学学报, 2012, (1): 34-35.
[11] Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, 6(2): 429-444.
[12] 杜娟, 霍佳震. 基于数据包络分析的中国城市创新能力评价[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(6): 85-93.
[13] 薛晖, 郑中华, 谢启伟. 基于多种 DEA 模型和 Gini 准则的效率评价方法——兼对我国高校运营绩效的评价[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(6): 98-104.
[14] Hotelling H. Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components [J]. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1993, 24(6): 417-441.
[15] Deng Julong. The control problems of grey systems [J]. Systems & Control Letters, 1982, 1(5): 288-294.
[16] Saaty T L. A scaling method for priorities in a hierarchical structures [J]. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1977, 6(15): 234-281.
[17] Van Laarhoven P L M, Pedrycz W. A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory [J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1983, 11(1): 229-241.
[18] Buckley J J. Fuzzy hierarchical analysis [J]. Fuzzy Sets Systems, 1985, 3(17): 233-247.
[19] Xu Zeshui. Intuitionistic preference relations and their application in group decision making [J]. Information Sciences, 2007, 177(11): 2363-2379.
[20] Xia Meimei, Xu Zeshui, Liao Huchang. Preference relations based on intuitionistic multiplicative information [J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2013, 3(20): 113-133.
[21] Zadeh L A. Fuzzy sets [J]. Information and Control, 1965, 8(3): 338-356.
[22] Xu Zeshui, Liao Huchang. Intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process [J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2014, 22(4): 749-761.
[23] Atanassov K. Intuitionistic fuzzy set [J]. Fuzzy Sets and System, 1986, 20(1): 87-96.
[24] Szmidt E, Kacprzyk J. Amount of information and its reliability in the ranking of Atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy alternatives [M]//Rakus-Adersson E, Yager R R,Ichalkaranjie N,et al. Recent adoances in decision making. Berlin: Springer, 2009:7-19.
[25] Xu Zeshui. Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators [J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2007, 15(6): 1179-1187.
