主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
论文

考虑消费者双重偏好的低碳供应链减排策略研究

展开
  • 1. 西安交通大学管理学院, 陕西 西安 710049;
    2. 新疆大学经济与管理学院, 新疆 乌鲁木齐 830046;
    3. 过程控制与效率工程教育部重点实验室, 陕西 西安 710049

收稿日期: 2017-01-13

  修回日期: 2017-09-11

  网络出版日期: 2018-06-22

基金资助

国家自然科学基金重大项目(71390333);国家自然科学基金面上项目(71671136);教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(16YJA630058)

Decision-making of Dual-channel Supply Chain Emission Reduction based on Consumer Preference to Low-carbon

Expand
  • 1. School of Management, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China;
    2. School of Economics and Management, Xinjiang University, Urumchi 830046, China;
    3. The Key Lab of the Ministry of Education for Process Control & Efficiency Engineering, Xi'an 710049, China

Received date: 2017-01-13

  Revised date: 2017-09-11

  Online published: 2018-06-22

摘要

为了削弱传统零售商在渠道博弈中的垄断地位,制造商尝试建立在线渠道与零售商展开竞争。本文在考虑消费者低碳偏好的基础上,又将消费者的渠道偏好进行区分,通过不同决策模式的对比及数值算例分析,寻求低碳供应链最优的减排边界。研究表明:1分散决策时,制造商的低碳决策会受消费者渠道偏好的影响;集中决策时,制造商的低碳决策保持不变。2不同决策模式的减排边界由渠道偏好决定,渠道偏好较大时,分散决策的减排边界更高;渠道偏好较低时,集中决策的减排边界更高;渠道偏好中立时,两者的减排边界相同。3制造商可以通过升级低碳技术、实行低碳化管理等方式降低减排成本,同时通过低碳产品认证、广告宣传等方式提高消费者对低碳产品的认可程度。

本文引用格式

孙嘉楠, 肖忠东 . 考虑消费者双重偏好的低碳供应链减排策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018 , 26(4) : 49 -56 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2018.04.006

Abstract

In order to weaken the monopoly position of traditional retailer, manufacturers introduce online channel to compete with retailers. This paper is on the basis of consumers' low-carbon and channel preferences, to research whether manufacturers would take action to reduce emissions. Through the comparative analysis of different decision models, the optimal boundary of emission reduction can be found. The results show that,in decentralized decision-making model, the low carbon decision of the manufacturer is influenced by the channel preference; the low carbon decision of the manufacturer remains unchanged when the centralized decision is made. Reduction boundary of different decision models is related to the preference for channel.When the channel preference is higher, the reduction boundary of decentralized decision-making is higher; when the channel preference is lower, the reduction boundary of centralized decision is higher; when the channel preference is neutral, both of them have same reduction boundary. The manufacturer should bring in low-carbon technology, low-carbon management and other ways to reduce the cost sensitive value, and also increase consumers' recognition of its low carbon products through low carbon product certification and advertising at the same time.

参考文献

[1] 王建明, 贺爱忠. 消费者低碳消费行为的心理归因和政策干预路径:一个基于扎根理论的探索性研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2011,14(4):80-89.

[2] Shuai Chuanmin, Ding Liping, Zhang Yukun, et al. How consumers are willing to pay for low-carbon products?-Results from a carbon-labeling scenario experiment in China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2014, 83:366-373.

[3] 范小军, 刘艳. 制造商引入在线渠道的双渠道价格与服务竞争策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016,24(7):143-148.

[4] Benjaafar S, Li Yanzhi, Daskin M. Carbon footprint and the management of supply chains:Insights from simple models[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2013, 10(1):99-116.

[5] Yang Lei, Zheng Chengbin, Xu Minghui. Comparisons of low carbon policies in supply chain coordination[J]. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2014, 23(3):342-361.

[6] 何华, 马常松, 吴忠和. 碳限额与交易政策下考虑绿色技术投入的定价策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(5):74-84.

[7] 赵道致, 原白云, 徐春秋. 考虑消费者低碳偏好未知的产品线定价策略[J]. 系统工程, 2014, 32(1):77-81.

[8] Du Shaofu, Hu Li, Song Malin. Production optimization considering environmental performance and preference in the cap-and-trade system[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 112:1600-1607.

[9] 刘名武, 吴开兰, 许茂增. 面向消费者低碳偏好的供应链减排成本分摊与协调[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2016, 21(4):50-57.

[10] 吴义生, 吴顺祥, 白少布, 等. 面向网购的低碳供应链超网络优化模型及其应用[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(6):111-120.

[11] Martín-Herrán G, Taboubi S. Price coordination in distribution channels:a dynamic perspective[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2015, 240(2):401-414.

[12] Li Bo,Zhu Mengyan, Jiang Yushan, et al. Pricing policies of a competitive dual-channel green supply chain[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 112(20):2029-2042.

[13] 滕文波, 庄贵军. 基于电子渠道需求预测的渠道模式选择[J]. 中国管理科学, 2011, 19(5):71-78.

[14] Chiang W K, Chhajed D, Hess J D. Direct marketing, indirect profits:A strategic analysis of dual-channel supply-chain design[J]. Management science, 2003, 49(1):1-20.

[15] 黄松, 杨超, 杨珺. 需求和成本同时扰动下双渠道供应链定价与生产决策[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2014, 34(5):1219-1229.

[16] 王一雷, 朱庆华, 夏西强. 基于消费偏好的供应链上下游联合减排协调契约博弈模型[J]. 系统工程学报, 2017, 32(2):188-198.

[17] 胡新平, 李天丽, 邓腾腾. 质量和价格影响需求的双渠道供应链饥饿营销策略[J]. 系统管理学报, 2015, 24(3):436-443.

[18] Yohe G W,Schlesinger M E.Sea-level change:the expected economic cost of protection or abandonment in the United States[J]. Climatic Change,1998,38(4):447-472.
文章导航

/