主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
论文

考虑保鲜努力与数量/质量弹性的农产品三级供应链协调优化

展开
  • 1. 烟台大学经济管理学院, 山东 烟台 264005;
    2. 曲阜师范大学管理学院, 山东 日照 276826

收稿日期: 2016-10-29

  修回日期: 2017-05-08

  网络出版日期: 2018-04-20

基金资助

国家自然科学基金资助项目(71672166,71372122,71402158,71771138);山东省自然科学基金项目(ZR2016GL01);山东省高校人文社会科学研究计划(J15WB23)

Coordination and Optimization of Three-echelon Agricultural Product Supply Chain Considering Freshness-keeping Effort and Quantity/Quality Elasticity

Expand
  • 1. Economics and Management School, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, China;
    2. School of Management, Qufu Normal Univerity, Rizhao 276826, China

Received date: 2016-10-29

  Revised date: 2017-05-08

  Online published: 2018-04-20

摘要

以供应具有季节性的农产品为研究对象,研究了由农户-第三方物流供应商(TPLP)-零售商组成的三级供应链协调问题。将农产品的数量和质量损耗均视为TPLP保鲜努力的内生变量,分别建立了分散与集中决策模式下的动态博弈模型。分析表明分散决策模式下供应链各成员的决策会导致产品销售量和销售价格扭曲,严重影响供应链绩效。针对三级供应链中的两个交易过程,并基于对系统中相关决策变量的变化及影响因素分析,分别设计了成本分担和收益共享协调契约,并论证了在一定条件下该组合协调机制可以显著扩大农产品的销售量,实现供应链各成员收益的帕累托改进。最后,通过算例验证了文章结论,并分析了努力水平对不同农产品质量和数量损耗的改善程度(数量/质量弹性)对农产品三级供应链决策及协调效果的影响。

本文引用格式

马雪丽, 王淑云, 金辉, 柏庆国 . 考虑保鲜努力与数量/质量弹性的农产品三级供应链协调优化[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018 , 26(2) : 175 -185 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2018.02.018

Abstract

Due to the seasonal characteristics of most fresh agricultural products, most farmer sprefer to preserve a certain quantity of the products in the third-party logistics providers(TPLP) to balance demand or to achieve added value. The three-echelon supply chain that is composed of suppliers, TPLP and retailers has been the main supply mode of seasonal supplied fresh agricultural products. However, slow-moving events of such products that result from inefficient supply chain coordination occur frequently in recent years. So the research on coordination mechanism of the three-echelon supply chain of fresh agricultural products is of great significance to promote the healthy development of the fresh agricultural industry.
In this paper, the coordination of a three-echelon supply chain consisting of famers, TPLP and retailers is considered.Both the quantity loss and quality loss are viewed as the endogenous variables of the freshness-keeping effort decided by TPLP. The farmers decide on the quantity of products to be preserved in TPLP and the wholesale price based on market demand, production cost and freshness-keeping cost. The retailerspurchase from TPLP and determine the selling price by taking into accountproduct freshness and wholesale price.
It is assumed that the three supply chain members are facing the common market and all information is shared through the supply chain, dynamic game models under both decentralized decision mode and centralized decision mode are established to study the coordination mechanism of the three-echelon supply chain.
By comparing the optimal decision model in decentralized and centralized system, reasons for supply chain profit loss and distortion of order quantity and selling price are analyzed. For the two transaction processes in the three-echelon supply chain system, through analysis of major influencing factors in the supply chain system, coordination contract based on cost and revenue sharing is designed.
Our analysis stresses three important results. First, it is found that the optimal freshness-keeping effort in the centralized system is the same with the effort in the decentralized system. Second, the major reason for slow-moving is the high freshness-keeping cost for that it will increase the product supply cost, especially for the product with higher quantity elasticity. So the coordination mechanism should focus on reducing product supply cost. The coordination can be ensured by cost and revenue sharing. Finally, the coordination effect of the incentive mechanism is mainly related to the price-elasticity.
Some computational studies are conducted to investigate the impacts of quantity and quality elasticity on the optimal decisions in both decentralized and centralized system, and the effect of revenue sharing coefficient on coordinated supply chain member's expected profit, as well as the impact of price-elasticity on coordination effect. The results indicate that the designed mechanism can make efficient coordination for the three-echelon fresh agricultural supply chain within the effective range of revenue sharing coefficient.
Our contribution lies in how to design appropriate mechanism to coordinate the three-echelon fresh agricultural supply chain, in a situation where both product quantity and quality depend on freshness-keeping effort and the market demand is affected by freshness, price and some random factors.The results of this paper can provide guidelines for the government to develop more efficient agricultural supply chain.

参考文献

[1] 安益. 栖霞积压了7亿多公斤苹果一块多赔钱也要卖.[2016-03-28].http://yantai.iqilu.com/ytminsheng/2016/0328/2733013.shtml.

[2] 王菲菲. 宁夏西红柿每斤1毛农户倾倒入渠.[2016-8-5],http://news.dayoo.com/photo/201608/05/140003_50040426_0.html.

[3] 但斌, 丁松, 伏红勇. 信息不对称下销地批发市场的生鲜供应链协调. 管理科学学报, 2013,16(10):40-50.

[4] 王淑云, 姜樱梅, 王宪杰. 农产品冷链三级库存一体化策略研究. 中国管理科学, 2016,24(2):108-114.

[5] 陈奕娟,何利芳,张诚一.考虑新鲜度的生鲜食品动态定价模型. 统计与决策, 2016,(8):47-50.

[6] Piramuthu S, Zhou Wei. RFID and perishable inventory management with shelf-space and freshness dependent demand. International Journal of Production Economics, 2013, 144(2):635-640.

[7] 李琳, 范体军. 零售商主导下生鲜农产品供应链的定价策略对比研究. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(12):113-123.

[8] Rahdar M, Nookabadi A S. Coordination mechanism for a deteriorating item in a two-level supply chain system. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2014, 38(11-12):2884-2900.

[9] Herbon A, Levner E, Cheng T C E. Perishable inventory management with dynamic pricing using time-temperature indicators linked to automatic detecting devices. International Journal of Production Economics, 2014, 147(1):605-613.

[10] 王磊, 但斌. 考虑零售商保鲜和消费者效用的生鲜农产品供应链协调. 运筹与管理, 2015, 24(5):44-51.

[11] Zhang Jianxiong, Liu Guowei, Zhang Qiao, et al. Coordinating a supply chain for deteriorating items with a revenue sharing and cooperative investment contract. Omega, 2015, 56:37-49.

[12] 熊峰, 彭健, 金鹏,等. 生鲜农产品供应链关系契约稳定性影响研究——以冷链设施补贴模式为视角. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(8):102-111.

[13] 吴忠和, 陈宏, 赵千. 时间约束下鲜活农产品供应链应急协调数量折扣契约研究. 运筹与管理, 2014,23(3):146-156.

[14] Qin Yiyan, Wang Jianjun, Wei Caimin. Joint pricing and inventory control for fresh produce and foods with quality and physical quantity deteriorating simultaneously. International Journal of Production Economics, 2014, 152(2):42-48.

[15] 王淑云,姜樱梅,王宪杰.变质率呈Weibull分布的一体化三级冷链库存策略研究,管理工程学报, 2015,29(2):229-239.

[16] Cai Xiaoqiang, Chen Jian, Xiao Yongbo, et al. Optimization and Coordination of Fresh Product Supply Chains with Freshness-Keeping Effort. Production & Operations Management, 2010, 19(3)19-25.

[17] 吴庆, 但斌, 钱宇,等. 努力水平影响损耗的低值易逝品TPL协调合同. 管理科学学报, 2014,(12):15-26.

[18] 林略, 杨书萍, 但斌. 时间约束下鲜活农产品三级供应链协调. 中国管理科学, 2011, 19(3):55-62.

[19] 肖勇波, 陈剑, 徐小林. 到岸价格商务模式下涉及远距离运输的时鲜产品供应链协调. 系统工程理论与实践, 2008, 28(2):19-25.

[20] 杨亚, 范体军, 张磊. 新鲜度信息不对称下生鲜农产品供应链协调. 中国管理科学, 2016,24(09):147-155.

[21] Li Liying, Wang Yong, Dai Wei. Coordinating supplier retailer and carrier with price discount policy. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2016,40(1):646-657.

[22] Hafezalkotob A, Makui A. Network design of a decentralized distribution supply chain:Analysis of noncooperative equilibria vs. coordination with discount or buyback mechanism. Scientia Iranica, 2014, 21(2):988-1006.

[23] Petruzzi N C, Dada M. Pricing and the news vendor problem:A review with extensions. Operations Research, 1999, 47(2):183-194.

[24] Dye C Y, Yang C T. Optimal dynamic pricing and preservation technology investment for deteriorating products with reference price effects. Omega, 2016, 62:52-67.
文章导航

/