主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
论文

基于社交网络的P2P借贷信用风险缓释机制研究

展开
  • 1. 湖南商学院湖南省移动电子商务协同创新中心, 湖南 长沙 410205;
    2. 湖南商学院大数据与互联网创新研究院, 湖南 长沙 410205;
    3. 中南大学商学院, 湖南 长沙 410083

收稿日期: 2016-12-20

  修回日期: 2017-03-21

  网络出版日期: 2018-03-19

基金资助

湖南省教育厅优秀青年基金项目(16B145);国家自然科学基金重点项目(71431006);国家社科基金青年项目(17CJY056);湖南省自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(2016JJ6050)

Research on Credit Risk Mitigation Mechanisms of Peer-to-peer Lending Based on Social Network

Expand
  • 1. Mobile E-business Collaborative Innovation Center of Hunan Province, Hunan University of Commerce, Changsha 410205, China;
    2. Institute of Big Data and Internet Innovation, Hunan University of Commerce, Changsha 410205, China;
    3. School of Business, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China

Received date: 2016-12-20

  Revised date: 2017-03-21

  Online published: 2018-03-19

摘要

本文以信息经济学和博弈论为基础,建立信息不对称的理论模型,从事前、事中、事后三个环节分析P2P借贷信用风险成因,讨论社交网络缓解信用风险的机制及其作用条件。研究表明,引入社交网络后,社交网络的事前信息获取机制、事中连带责任机制和事后违约约束机制构成社交网络独特的信用风险缓释机制。连带责任、动态激励、监督强度、违约约束制裁大小、违约约束强度以及对社交信息的挖掘是决定社交网络风险缓释水平的重要因素。当社交网络信息可以实现借款人风险甄别或借款人社交账户可作为充足"虚拟抵押品"时,社交软信息可有效缓解征信不完善导致的事前逆向选择;引入社交朋友关系后,连带责任带来的隐性契约有效缓解缺乏监督机制导致的事中道德风险;社交网络的社会制裁可有效缓解缺乏违约约束导致的事后道德风险,尤其配合停贷威胁的动态激励时其风险缓释作用更为显著。拆解社交网络如何对信用风险产生影响的"理论黑箱",提出了社交网络信用风险缓释机制的理论框架,为如何运用社交网络进行风险控制提供理论支持。

本文引用格式

杨立, 赵翠翠, 陈晓红 . 基于社交网络的P2P借贷信用风险缓释机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018 , 26(1) : 47 -56 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2018.01.005

Abstract

Risk management is the core issue to determine the sustainable and healthy development of financial innovation. Based on the information economics and game theory, an information asymmetry mathematical model is set up to analyze the acting mechanism and working conditions of social network in mitigating P2P lending's credit risk. It is proved that with the introduction of social network, the credit risk of P2P lending can be mitigated by three mechanisms of social network, which are ex ante information acquisition mechanism, joint liability mechanism and ex post default constraint mechanism. Those constitute unique credit risk mitigation mechanisms of social network, which can effectively relieve adverse selection caused by imperfection of credit system as well as moral hazard caused by lack of effective monitoring mechanism and lack of default constraint mechanism in P2P lending market. Joint liability, dynamic incentive, the strength of supervision, sanctions, constraints of default intensity and the mining of social information are thedetermining factors to the risk mitigation level of social network. The theoretical frameworks are first proposed for credit risk mitigation of social network in P2P lending, including the developed social network theory and credit risk management theory,which provide new scientific evidence and theoretical support for risk control trial with social network in P2P platform. Great theoretical importance is provided to understand and grasp risk mitigation mechanisms of social network, as well as to use social network credit risk management.

参考文献

[1] 万建华.金融e时代:数字化时代的金融变局[M]. 北京:中信出版社, 2013.

[2] Krumme K A, Herrero S. Lending behavior and community structure in an online peer-to-peer economic network[C]//Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering,Vancouver,Canada,August 29-31,2009.

[3] Fafchamps M, Gubert F. The formation of risk sharing networks[J]. Journal of development Economics, 2007, 83(2):326-350.

[4] Munshi, K. and M. Rosenzweig. Why is Mobility in India So Low? Social Insurance, Inequality and Growth[R]. Working Paper,National Bureau of Econmic Research, 2009.

[5] Grootaert C. Social capital, household welfare, and poverty in Indonesia[R]. Policy Research Wroking paper the Wrold Bank,1999.

[6] Narayan D, Pritchett L. Cents and sociability:Household income and social capital in rural Tanzania[J]. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 1999, 47(4):871-897.

[7] Montgomery, J D. Social Networks and Labor Market Outcomes:towards an Economic Analysis[J]. American Economic Review, 1991, 81(5):1408-1418.

[8] James S, Lahti T. Traditional institutions meet the modern world:Caste, gender, and schooling choice in a globalizing economy[J]. The American Economic Review, 2006, 96(4):1225-1252.

[9] 王萌, 郭迅华,陈国青, 等. 在线关系对中小网商绩效影响的实证分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(10):156-163.

[10] 谭云清, 马永生, 李元旭. 社会资本, 动态能力对创新绩效的影响:基于我国国际接包企业的实证研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2013, 21(11):784.

[11] Giné X, Karlan D S. Group versus individual liability:Long term evidence from Philippine microcredit lending groups[J]. Journal of Development Economics,2014,107:65-83.

[12] Feigenberg B, Field E M, Pande R. Building social capital through microfinance[R]. Work Paper,National Bureau of Economic Research, 2010.

[13] Berger A N, Saunders A, Scalise J M, et al. The effects of bank mergers and acquisitions on small business lending[J]. Journal of financial Economics, 1998, 50(2):187-229.

[14] Okten C, Osili U O. Social networks and credit access in Indonesia[J]. World Development, 2004, 32(7):1225-1246.

[15] Montgomery J D. Social networks and labor-market outcomes:Toward an economic analysis[J]. The American Economic Review, 1991, 81(5):1408-1418.

[16] James S, Lahti T. Traditional institutions meet the modern world:Caste, gender, and schooling choice in a globalizing economy[J]. The American Economic Review, 2006, 96(4):1225-1252.

[17] Kumar S. Bank of one:Empirical analysis of peer-to-peer financial marketplaces[C]//Proceedings of the 2007 America Conference on Information Systems, Keystone, Colorado, USA,2007.

[18] Lin Mingfeng, Prabhala N R, Viswanathan S. Judging borrowers by the company they keep:Social networks and adverse selection in online peer-to-peer lending[J]. Management Science,2013,59(1):17-35.

[19] Liu De, Brass DJ, Lu Yong, et al. Friendships in online peer-to-peer lending:Pipes, prisms, and relational herding[J]. 2015.

[20] Greiner M E, Wang H. The role of social capital in people-to-people lending marketplaces[J]. ICIS 2009 Proceedings, 2009:29.

[21] Brandes U, Lerner J, Nick B, et al. Network effects on interest rates in online social lending[C]//Proceedings of the International Confereme on Information Systems,Phoenix,Arizona,USA,December,15-18,2009.

[22] Berger S C, Gleisner F. Emergence of financial intermediaries in electronic markets:The case of online P2P lending[J].Journal of VHB, 2010,2(1):39-65.

[23] Collier B C, Hampshire R. Sending mixed signals:Multilevel reputation effects in peer-to-peer lending markets[C]//Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Savannah,Georgia,USA,February 6-10,2010.

[24] Freedman S, Jin G. Dynamic learning and selection:the early years of prosper. com[R].Working Paper, University of Maryland, 2008.

[25] Freedman S M, Jin G Z. The signaling value of online social networks:lessons from peer-to-peer lending[J]. Interational Jouranl of Industrial Organization,2017,51:185-222.

[26] Chen Xiangru, Zhou Lina, Wan Difang. Group social capital and lending outcomes in the financial credit market:An empirical study of online peer-to-peer lending[J]. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2016, 15:1-13.

[27] Johnson S, Ashta A, Assadi D. Online or offline?:The rise of "peer-to-peer" lending in microfinance[J]. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 2010, 8(3):26-37.

[28] 陈冬宇, 朱浩, 郑海超. 风险、信任和出借意愿——基于拍拍贷注册用户的实证研究[J]. 管理评论, 2014, 26(1):150-158.

[29] 牛丰, 杨立. 基于博弈理论的P2P借贷信用风险产生机制分析[J]. 财务与金融,2016,(1):1-6.

[30] Stiglitz J E, Weiss A. Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information[J]. The American Economic Review, 1981, 71(3):393-410.

[31] Ghatak M, Guinnane T W. The economics of lending with joint liability:Theory and practice[J]. Journal of Development Economics, 1999, 60(1):195-228.

[32] Armendáriz B, Morduch J. The economics of microfinance[M].Cambridge,Massachusetts:MIT press, 2010.

[33] Aghion D, Armendariz B, Gollier C. Peer group formation in an adverse selection model[J]. The Economic Journal, 2000, 110(465):632-643.

[34] 刘征驰, 赖明勇. 虚拟抵押品、软信息约束与P2P互联网金融[J].中国软科学, 2015,(1):35-46.

[35] Karlan D S. Social connections and group banking[J]. The Economic Journal, 2007, 117(517):52-84.
文章导航

/