面临全球气候变化的压力，越来越多的国家已经开始实施各项政策限制企业碳排放。本文以国际供应链环境中的生产商为研究主体，基于地区间碳排放交易制度差异构建国际供应链生产计划模型，以实现生产商的总成本最小化，其中考虑了变动和固定碳排放交易价格两种碳排放交易制度。此外，引入了碳配额和碳价同步调整措施，并分别从地区经济发展和减排角度、生产商成本和碳排角度，以及供应链成本和碳排角度分析了碳排放交易制度差异带来的影响。本文提出的一类考虑碳排放交易制度差异的国际供应链生产计划模型，为国际供应链制定生产计划以及工厂选址提供决策支持，并为国际和地区内碳排放交易制度制定者提供理论建议。
In order to curb global climate change caused by carbon emission, an increasing amount of governments have launched carbon emission cap-and-trade systems to motivate emission reduction in their countries. The different carbon emission cap-and-trade systems in different countries or regions bring both challenge and opportunity to multinational corporations. The challenge lies on carbon emission reduction because emission causes extra operational cost. While corporations can take the opportunity to reduce operational cost by reallocating production in different regions. Therefore, under the background of international supply chain, traditional supply chain production planning model is extended and two cap-and-trade systems, one with fixed carbon emission price and another with variable carbon emission price are considered. After solving the international supply chain production planning model under different carbon cap-and-trade systems, the influence of different carbon emission price mechanisms and synchronous adjustment of carbon cap and trading price is analyzed. The influence analysis is made from perspectives of regions, the manufacturer, and the whole supply chain. It is shown that the production planning model established in our paper provides decision support for international supply chains on production allocation and factory location, and also brings suggestions to international and regional carbon policy-makers to reduce carbon emission.
[1] Dekker R, Bloemhof J, Mallidis I. Operations research for green logistics-An overview of aspects, issues, contributions and challenges[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2012, 219(3):671-679.
[2] Benjaafar S, Li Yanzhi, Daskin M S.Carbon footprint and the management of supply chains:Insights from simple models[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2013, 10(1):99-116.
[3] 赵道致,原白云,徐春秋. 低碳环境下供应链纵向减排合作的动态协调策略[J]. 管理工程学报,2016,30(1):147-154.
[4] 李剑,苏秦. 考虑运输过程的供应链减排模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学,2017,25(2):78-86.
[5] Absi N, Dauzère-Pérès S, Kedad-Sidhoum S, et al. Lot sizing with carbon emission constraints[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2013, 227(1):55-61.
[6] Helmrich M J R, Jans R, van den Heuvel W, et al. The economic lot-sizing problem with an emission capacity constraint[J].European Journal of Operational Research, 2015, 241(1):50-62.
[7] Fankhauser S, Hepburn C. Designing carbon markets. Part I:Carbon markets in time[J]. Energy Policy, 2010, 38(8):4363-4370.
[8] Fankhauser S, Hepburn C. Designing carbon markets, Part Ⅱ:Carbon markets in space[J]. Energy Policy, 2010, 38(8):4381-4387.
[9] Hua Guowei, Cheng T C E, Wang Shouyang.Managing carbon footprints in inventory management[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2011, 132(2):178-185.
[10] Bouchery Y, Fransoo J. Cost, carbon emissions and modal shift in intermodal network design decisions[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2015, 164:388-399.
[11] Zakeri A, Dehghanian F, Fahimnia B, et al. Carbon pricing versus emissions trading:A supply chain planning perspective[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2015, 164:197-205.
[12] 方健,徐丽群. 随机需求下考虑碳排放的供应商选择问题研究[J]. 中国管理科学,2016,24(2):56-60.
[13] 周艳菊,黄雨晴,陈晓红,等. 促进低碳产品需求的供应链减排成本分担模型[J]. 中国管理科学,2015,23(7):85-93.
[14] 周艳菊,鲍茂景,陈晓红,等. 基于公平关切的低碳供应链广告合作-减排成本分担契约与协调[J]. 中国管理科学,2017,25(2):121-129.
[15] 陈晓红,曾祥宇,王傅强. 碳限额交易机制下碳交易价格对供应链碳排放的影响[J]. 系统工程理论与实践,2016,36(10):2562-2571.
[16] Sabzevar N, Enns S T, Bergerson J, et al. Modeling competitive firms' performance under price-sensitive demand and cap-and-trade emissions constraints[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2017, 184:193-209.
[17] Meisel F, Thomas K, Christian B. Integrated production and intermodal transportation planning in large scale production-distribution-networks[J]. Transportation Research Part E:Logistics and Transportation Review, 2013, 60(4):62-78.
