主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
论文

三种混合分销渠道条件下供应链产品质量控制策略研究

展开
  • 1. 山东师范大学商学院, 山东 济南 250014;
    2. 山东大学管理学院, 山东 济南 250100

收稿日期: 2015-10-10

  修回日期: 2016-03-21

  网络出版日期: 2017-05-27

基金资助

国家社会科学基金重点项目(13AGL012);山东省社会科学规划项目(16CQXJ03);中国博士后科学基金面上项目(2015M580597);山东省博士后创新项目(201503009)

Products Quality Control Strategy of Supply Chain in the Condition of Three Types of Mixed Distribution Channel

Expand
  • 1. School of Business, Shandong Normal University, Ji'nan 250014, China;
    2. School of Management, Shandong University, Ji'nan 250100, China

Received date: 2015-10-10

  Revised date: 2016-03-21

  Online published: 2017-05-27

摘要

考虑当供应商自建Internet网上渠道、零售商自建Internet网上渠道、委托第三方网络提供商建Internet网上渠道三种情况下,混合分销渠道中如何制定产品质量控制策略的问题,通过构建Stackelberg主从动态博弈模型,分析了市场份额比例、利润分配比例、需求价格弹性系数、质量成本系数对混合渠道产品质量控制策略的影响,以及对不同渠道产品需求、期望利润函数和消费者剩余的影响。通过模型分析,可以证明:随着市场份额比例的增加,供应商自建Internet网上渠道时产品质量水平将高于委托第三方建Internet网上渠道时高于零售商自建Internet网上渠道时;当供应商自建Internet网上渠道时,产品质量水平和供应商期望利润先下降后增加,呈U型;当零售商自建Internet网上渠道时,零售渠道需求量和零售商期望利润将增加;当委托第三方建Internet网上渠道时,各参数关系取决于供应商利润分配比例的阈值。最后,进行了算例分析,为该模型在实践中的具体应用指明了方向。

本文引用格式

朱立龙, 郭鹏菲, 孙淑慧 . 三种混合分销渠道条件下供应链产品质量控制策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017 , 25(3) : 111 -120 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2017.03.013

Abstract

In this paper, Stackelberg dynamic game model is constructed and how to make a products quality control strategy when the supplier and retailer self-build and entrusting a third party builds the internet channel is analyzed. How the market proportion, supplier's profit sharing ratio, the demand price elasticity and quality cost function affect products quality control strategy in mixed distribution channel, and further influence the demand of retailing channel and internet channel, the expected profits function and consumers surplus are analyzed. The model analysis demonstrates that:with the increasing of retailing channel market proportion, the products quality level when the supplier self-builds the internet channel will be higher than that when entrusting a third party builds the interner channel and also higher than retailer self-builds the interner channel; when the supplier self-builds internet channel, the products quality level and supplier's expected profits will decrease firstly and then increase, namely U-shape; when the retailer self-builds internet channel, the demand of retailing channel and retailer's expected profits will increase; when entrusting a third party builds internet channel, the parameters depend on the threshold of supplier's profit sharing ratio. Above all, a numerical example which will indicate the further specific application direction in practice is conducted.

参考文献

[1] Desai P, Koenigsberg O, Purohit D. Strategy decentralized and channel coordination[J]. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 2004, 2(1):5-22.

[2] Tyagi R K. Technological advances, transaction costs, and consumer welfare[J]. Marketing Science, 2004, 23(3):335-344.

[3] Raju J, Zhang Z J.Channel coordination in the presence of dominant retailer[J]. Marketing Science, 2005, 24(2):254-262.

[4] Cui T H, Raju J S, Zhang Z J. Fairness and channel coordination[J]. Management Science, 2007, 53(8):1303-1314.

[5] Xu Xiaowei. Optimal price and product quality decisions in a distribution channel[J]. Management Science, 2009, 55(8):1347-1352.

[6] Liu Yunchuan, Tyagi R K. The benefits of competitive upward channel decentralization[J]. Management Science, 2011, 57(4):741-751.

[7] Tsao Y C. Managing a retail-competition distribution channel with incentive policies[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2011, 35(9):4140-4148.

[8] Paksoy T, Pehlivan N Y, Kahraman C. Organizational strategy development in distribution channel management using fuzzy AHP and hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2012, 39(3):2822-2841.

[9] Shi Hongyan, Liu Yunchuan, Petruzzi N C. Consumer heterogeneity, product quality, and distribution channels[J]. Management Science, 2013, 59(5):1162-1176.

[10] Xu Guangye, Dan Bin, Zhang Xumei, et al. Coordinating a dual-channel supply chain with risk-averse under a two-way revenue sharing contract[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2014, 147:171-179.

[11] Guo Liang, Li Tian, Zhang Hongtao. Strategic information sharing in competing channels[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2014, 23(10):1719-1731.

[12] Un C A, Asakawa K. Types of R&D collaborations and process innovation:The benefit of collaborating upstream in the knowledge chain[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2015, 32(1):138-153.

[13] Matsui K. Asymmetric product distribution between symmetric manufacturers using dual-channel supply chains[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2016, 248(2):646-657.

[14] Corbett C J, Decroix G A, Ha A Y. Optimal shared-savings contracts in supply chains:Linear contracts and double moral hazard[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2005, 163(3):653-667.

[15] Berstain F, Federgruen A. Decentralized supply chain with competing retailers under demand uncertainty[J]. Management Science, 2005, 51(1):18-29.

[16] Cachon G P, Lariviere M A. Supply chain coordination with revenue-sharing contracts:Strengths and limitations[J]. Management Science, 2005, 51(1):30-44.

[17] Yehekel Y. Retailer's choice of product variety and exclusive dealing under asymmetric information[J]. RAND Journal of Economics, 2008, 39 (1), 115-143.

[18] Chao G H, Iravani S M R, Savaskan R C. Quality improvement incentives and product recall cost sharing contracts[J]. Management Science, 2009, 55(7):1122-1138.

[19] Zhu Lilong, You Jianxin. Moral hazard strategy and quality contract design in a two-echelon supply chain[J]. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2011, 20(1):70-86.

[20] Zhang Shuning, Wang Fuli, He Dakuo, et al. Real-time product quality control for batch processes based on stacked least-squares support vector regression models[J]. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2012, 36:217-226.

[21] Ma Peng, Wang Haiyan, Shang J. Contract design for two-stage supply chain coordination:Integrating manufacturer-quality and retailer-marketing efforts[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2013, 146 (2):745-755.

[22] Zhang Jie, Chiang W K, Liang Liang. Strategic pricing with reference effects in a competitive supply chain[J]. Omega, 2014, 44:126-135.

[23] Karray S. Cooperative promotions in the distribution channel[J]. Omega, 2015, 51:49-58.

[24] Liu Weihua, Wang Yijia. Quality control game model in logistics service supply chain based on different combinations of risk attitude[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2015, 161:181-191.

[25] Sarkar B, Saren S. Product inspection policy for an imperfect production system with inspection errors and warranty cost[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2016, 248(1):263-271.

[26] 徐广业, 但斌, 肖剑. 基于改进收益共享契约的双渠道供应链协调研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2010, 18(6):59-64.

[27] 许传永, 苟清龙, 周垂日,等. 两层双渠道供应链的定价问题[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2010, 30(10):1741-1752.

[28] 刑伟, 汪寿阳, 赵秋红, 等. 考虑渠道公平的双渠道供应链均衡策略[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2011, 31(7):1249-1256.

[29] 许垒, 李勇建. 考虑消费者行为的供应链混合渠道结构研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2013, 33(7):1672-1681.

[30] Cai Xiaoqiang, Chen Jian, Xiao Yongbo, et al. Fresh-product supply chain management with logistics outsourcing[J]. Omega. 2013, 41(4):752-765.

[31] 朱立龙, 于涛, 夏同水. 两级供应链产品质量控制契约模型分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2013, 21(1):71-79.

[32] 朱立龙, 于涛, 夏同水. 创新驱动下三级供应链分销渠道产品质量控制策略研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2014, 34(8):1986-1997.

[33] 朱立龙. 双寡头零售商分销渠道产品质量控制策略研究[J]. 管理评论, 2016, 28(10):239-249.

[34] 赵礼强, 徐家旺. 基于电子市场的供应链双渠道冲突与协调的契约设计[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(5):61-68.

[35] 陈瑞义, 盛昭瀚, 徐峰. 基于不同谈判策略的产品质量协同控制研究[J]. 管理科学, 2014, 27(1):21-30.

[36] 张翠华, 王海英, 王养彬. 质量预防水平不确定下供应链质量控制鲁棒设计模型[J]. 管理工程学报, 2015, 29(1):68-73.

[37] 刘威延, 苏秦. 不完全信息均衡向完全信息转化的供应链质量合同设计[J]. 系统管理学报, 2015, 24(5):748-755.

[38] 刘汉进, 范小军, 陈宏民. 零售商价格领导权结构下的双渠道定价策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(6):91-98.

[39] 马祖军, 胡书, 代颖. 政府规制下混合渠道销售/回收的电器电子产品闭环供应链决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(1):82-90.
文章导航

/