主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
论文

领导和管理的时空理论

展开
  • 清华大学经济管理学院, 北京 100084

收稿日期: 2016-09-28

  修回日期: 2017-01-06

  网络出版日期: 2017-03-22

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(71421061;71121001;70625003)

Time-Space Theory of Leadership and Management

Expand
  • School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Received date: 2016-09-28

  Revised date: 2017-01-06

  Online published: 2017-03-22

摘要

本文提出了一个关于组织的新比喻,将组织比喻成时空系统,包含时间和空间因素。基于这个比喻,本文提出了领导和管理的时空理论,即领导者和管理者可以从时间和空间的视角来认识、分析和设计组织。其中,时间视角包含学习和创新两个方面,即传承和变革。空间视角包含层次和维度两个方面,一方面,组织系统在空间上可以从微观到宏观划分为多个层次,如个体、群体、组织等,且多层次之间是相互作用的;另一方面,组织系统在空间上可以划分为方法维度和资源维度等,方法维度包括目标和方法系统、利益和权力系统以及信仰和价值观系统等,资源维度包括人力系统、物力系统和财力系统等,且维度之间是相互作用的。本文提出了一系列的理论观点,并提供了若干个简化模型和相应的方法和措施,还特别强调了组织分析和设计的四维度理论和方法。本文指出,领导者和管理者在分析和设计组织时,要建立时空领导力,提高时空情商和时空智商,提升时空智慧,应该系统地考虑时间和空间两种视角,同时也要抓住重点因素,从而使得组织提高成效,减少决策偏差,得到决策的更满意解,建立竞争优势,保持可持续的生存和健康和谐的发展。进而,领导者和管理者要努力做到“知微知彰”、“知柔知刚”、“知常知变”,通过“知行合一”,促进“天人合一”和社会和谐,以建设更美好的社会。

本文引用格式

陈国权 . 领导和管理的时空理论[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017 , 25(1) : 181 -196 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2017.01.019

Abstract

In this paper, a new metaphor of organization is proposed. Organizations could be seen as Time-Space Systems, including time and space factors. Based on this metaphor, a time-space theory of leadership and management, which shows that leaders and managers can analyze organizations from a time-space perspective, namely in the dimensions of time and space,is proposed. Time perspective includes learning and innovation. Space perspective includes level and dimension perspective. Organizational system could be divided into several levels from micro to macro, such as individual, group, organization and so on. All levels are interacted with each other. Organizational system could also be divided into method dimension which includes goal and approach system, interest and power system, belief and value system, and so on,and resource dimension which includes human capital, material capital, financial capital,and so on. The paper put forwards a series of theoretical propositions and practical methodologies. Several simplified models and the related tools are proposed, and then four-dimensional theory of organizational analysis and design is articulated. Leaders and managers should build up their time-space leadership and enhance their time-space emotional quotient, intelligence quotient and time-space wisdom. Leaders and managers should not only analyze and design organizations in a systematic view but also grasp some key factors, in order to improve organizational effectiveness, decrease bias and get more satisfactory solutions for decision making, build competitive advantage, and maintain sustainability, as well as harmonious and healthy development. Further, leaders and managers should make great efforts to know both micro and macro, both softness and hardness, both constant and change, and then reach a state of the unity of knowing and doing, and improve the unity of human and heaven and harmoniousness of society, and then build a better society.

参考文献

[1] Weber M. Economy and society:an interpretive sociology (trans)[M]. New York:University of Californio Press, 1978.

[2] Barnard C I. The functions of the executive[M]. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press, 1938.

[3] March J G, Simon H A. Organizations[M]. Oxford, England:Wiley Organizations, 1958.

[4] Morgan G. Images of organization[M]. Beverly Hills:Sage Publications,1988.

[5] Taylor F W. The principles of scientific management[M]. New York:Harper, 1911.

[6] Trist E L, Bamforth K W.Social and psychological consequences of long wall coal mining[J]. Human Relations, 1951, 4(3):3-38.

[7] Trist E L. The sociotechnical perspective, the evolution of sociotechnical systems as a conceptual framework and action research program[M]//Van de Ven A H, Joyce W F. Perspectives on organization design and behavior. New York:John Wiley & Sons, 1981:19-75.

[8] Kast F E, Rosenzweig J E. General systems theory:applications for organization and management[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1972, 15(4):447-465.

[9] Scott W R. Organizations:rational, natural and open systems[M]. New Jersey:Prentice-Hall, Inc, 1981.

[10] Fayol H. General and industrial management (trans)[M]. London:Pitman, 1949.

[11] Simon H A. Administrative behavior[M]. New York:Free Press, 1945.

[12] Mayo E. The social problems of an industrial civilization[M]. Oxon:Routledge, 1949.

[13] Selznick P. Foundations of the theory of organization[J]. American Sociological Review, 1948, 13(1):25-35.

[14] Beer S. Cybernetics and management[M]. New York:Wiley, 1964.

[15] Galbraith J R. Designing complex organizations[M]. Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley, 1973.

[16] Weick K E. The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley, 1969.

[17] Ancona D,Kochan T,Maanen J V, Scully M, Westney E. Organizational behavior and processes[M]. Boston:South-Western College Publishing, 1999.

[18] Robbins S P, Judeg T A. Organizational behavior, 17thed[M]. New Jersey:Pearson, 2016.

[19] Freeman R E. Strategic management:a stakeholder approach[M]. Boston:Pitman, 1984.

[20] Peters T J,Waterman,Jr.R H.In search of excellence:lessons from America's best-run companies[J].Journal of Business Ethics,1985,4(1):70-80.

[21] Hofstede G. Motivation, leadership, and organization:do American theories apply abroad?[J]. Organizational Dynamics, 1980, 9(1):42-63.

[22] Kouzes J M, Caldwell D. F, Posner B Z. Organizational culture:how it is created, maintained, and changed[C].OD network national conference, Los Angeles,1983.

[23] Ouchi W. Theory Z:How American business can meet the Japanese challenge[J]. Business Horizons, 1981, 24(6):82-83.

[24] Schein E H. Organizational culture[J]. American Psychologist, 1990, 45(2):109-119.

[25] Wernerfelt B. A resource-based view of the firm[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1984, 5(2):171-180.

[26] Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage[J]. Journal of Management, 1991, 17(1):99-120.

[27] Senge P M. The art and practice of the learning organization[M]. New York:Doubleday, 1991.

[28] Drucker P F. People and performance:the best of Peter Drucker on management[M]. Boston, Mass:Harvard Business School Press, 2007.

[29] Toynbee A J. A study of history[M]. New York:Oxford University Press, 1957.

[30] Porter M E. Competitive strategy:techniques for analyzing industries and competitors[M]. New York, Free Press, 1980.

[31] Chen M J, Smith K G, Grimm C M. Action characteristics as predictors of competitive responses[J]. Management Science, 1992, 38(3):439-455.

[32] Chen M J, MacMillan I. Nonresponse and delayed response to competitive moves[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1992, 35(3):539-570.

[33] Chen M J, Miller D. Competitive attack, retaliation and performance:an expectancy-valence framework[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1994, 15(2):85-102.

[34] Kahneman,D.Attention and effort[M].Englewood Cliffs,N J:Prentice-Hall,1973.

[35] Dewar R D, Dutton J E. The adoption of radical and incremental innovations:an empirical analysis[J]. Management Science, 1986, 32(11):1422-1433.

[36] Lewin K. Frontiers in group dynamics. II. channels of group life; social planning and action research[J]. Human Relations, 1947, 1(2):143-153.

[37] Kahneman D,Tversky A. Prospect theory:an analysis of decision under risk[J].Econometrica,1979, 47:263-291.

[38] Tversky A,Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory:cumulative representation of uncertainty[J].Journal of Risk and Uncertainty,1992,5(4):297-323.

[39] Savitz A, Weber K. The triple bottom line:how today's best-run companies are achieving economic, social and environmental success-and how you can too[M]. San Francisco:John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
文章导航

/