In order to get rid of the inconsistency among evaluation results from different dynamic evaluation methods and dynamic combined evaluation methods,a dynamic combined evaluation method based on consistency is proposed. The thinking of the dynamic combined evaluation method is as following. The dynamic compatible methods set is determined. The dynamic evaluation results from different dynamic evaluation methods of dynamic compatible methods set are combined by several dynamic combined evaluation methods. If the evaluation results are inconsistency, the dynamic combined evaluation results are combined and recombined by these dynamic combined evaluation methods, until the consistency dynamic combined sorting results are obtained. In practice, a dynamic combined evaluation is conducted on the independent innovation capabilities of the provinces in east China. The source data of the evaluation indicators for the regional independent innovation capacities come from China Statistical Yearbook, China Statistical Yearbook on Science and Technology, and the web site of People's Republic of China Ministry of Science and Technology which provides a database with the major indicators for the science and technology in China. Such an evaluation, as an instance, shows that the findings of this work are practically effective. The consistency evaluation results of the evaluation objects at a certain time and the overall evaluation results of the evaluation objects at a period of time are both obtained by this method. The method proposed in this study provides an idea in dealing with dynamic evaluation and the inconsistency among dynamic evaluation results, helpfully complements the comprehensive evaluation method, and facilitates the researches in related fields.
[1] 郭亚军.综合评价理论、方法与拓展[M].北京:科学出版社,2012.
[2] 王欣荣,樊治平.上市公司财务状况的动态多指标综合评价方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2002,(4):54-57.
[3] 刘微微,石春生,吴际.具有速度特征的动态评价方法及应用[J].中国软科学,2010,(10):180-185.
[4] Kou Gang,Wu Wenshuai,Zhao Yiyi,et al.A dynamic assessment method for urban eco-environmental quality evaluation[J].Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis,2011,18(1):23-38.
[5] Tao Yong,Shen Feifei,Hu Mingli.A dynamic evaluation model of university leading cadre based on multivariate delay connection number[J].Kybernetes,2012,41(5):703-713.
[6] Shi Li.IT outsourcing service provider dynamic evaluation model and algorithms based on Rough Set[J].International Journal of Computer Science Issues,2013,10(1):236-241.
[7] Wang Ke,Yu Shiwei,Zhang Wei.China's regional energy and environmental efficiency:A DEA window analysis based dynamic evaluation[J].Mathematical and Computer Modelling,2013,58(5):1117-1127.
[8] Guo Sandang,Liu Sifeng,Fang Zhigeng,et al.Multi-phase information aggregation and dynamic synthetic evaluation based on grey inspiriting control lines[J].Grey Systems:Theory and Application,2014,4(2):154-163.
[9] 易平涛,周莹,郭亚军.带有奖惩作用的多指标动态综合评价方法及其应用[J].东北大学学报:自然科学版,2014,35(4):597-599.
[10] 张发明,孙文龙.改进的动态激励综合评价方法及应用[J].系统工程学报,2015,(5):711-718.
[11] 苏为华,张崇辉,曾守桢.主体存在变动的动态群组评价方法及应用[J].统计研究,2015,(7):100-105.
[12] 廖志高,詹敏,徐玖平.物元法分类动态综合评价方法及速度特征分析[J].中国管理科学,2015,23(11):119-127.
[13] 李美娟,陈国宏,林志炳,等.基于理想解法的动态评价方法研究[J].中国管理科学,2015,23(10):159-164.
[14] 陈国宏,李美娟.基于总体离差平方和最大的区域自主创新能力动态评价研究[J].研究与发展管理,2014,(5):43-53.
[15] 徐泽水,达庆利.多属性决策的组合赋权方法研究[J].中国管理科学,2002,10(2):84-87.
[16] 金菊良,魏一鸣,丁晶.基于组合权重的系统评价模型[J].数学的实践与认识,2003,33(11):51-59.
[17] Wang Yingming,Parkan C.A general multiple attribute decision-making approach for integrating subjective preferences and objective information[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2006,157(10):1333-1345.
[18] 孙莹,鲍新中.一种基于方差最大化的组合赋权评价方法及其应用[J].中国管理科学,2011,19(6):141-148.
[19] 李刚,王斌,周立斌,等.基于标准差修正G1组合赋权的人的全面发展评价模型及实证[J].系统工程理论与实践,2012,32(11):2473-2485.
[20] 石莉,杨善林,马英,等.一种新的组合权重集结方法及合理性评价研究[J].系统工程学报,2012,27(4):481-491.
[21] 刘德海,于倩,马晓南,等.基于最小偏差组合权重的突发事件应急能力评价模型[J].中国管理科学,2014,22(11):79-86.
[22] 石宝峰,程砚秋,王静.变异系数加权的组合赋权模型及科技评价实证[J].科研管理,2016,37(5):122-131.
[23] 郭亚军,马赞福,张发明.组合评价方法的相对有效性分析及应用[J].中国管理科学,2009,17(2):125-130.
[24] 柳玉鹏,李一军.基于降维思想的客观组合评价模型[J].运筹与管理,2009,18(4):38-43.
[25] 俞立平.一种新的科教组合评价方法——共性数据排序选择模型[J].统计研究,2009,26(7):103-108.
[26] 倪渊,林健.中层管理者胜任力组合评价模型及实证研究[J].系统工程,2012,30(1):1-7.
[27] 李珠瑞,马溪骏,彭张林.基于离差最大化的组合评价方法研究[J].中国管理科学,2013,21(1):174-179.
[28] 张发明.一种融合相似与差异特征的组合评价方法及应用[J].系统管理学报,2013,22(4):498-504.
[29] 吴开亚,金菊良,王文圣.基于集对分析的组合评价模型及其应用[J].数学的实践与认识,2013,43(3):1-6.
[30] 赵树平,梁昌勇,罗大伟.基于VIKOR和诱导广义直觉梯形模糊Choquet积分算子的多属性群决策方法[J].中国管理科学,2016,24(6):132-142.
[31] Rao R V.Evaluating flexible manufacturing systems using a combined multiple attribute decision making method[J].International Journal of Production Research,2008,46(7):1975-1989.
[32] Ren Jing,Xiong Yijie.An optimised method of weighting combination in multi-index comprehensive evaluation[J].International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences,2010,3(1):34-52.
[33] Leonidas A,Dimitrios K,Panayiotis B.Improved retrieval effectiveness by efficient combination of term proximity and zone scoring:A simulation-based evaluation[J].Simulation Modelling Practice&Theory,2012,22:74-91.
[34] 陈国宏,李美娟.基于方法集的综合评价方法集化研究[J].中国管理科学,2004,12(1):101-105.
[35] 陈国宏,李美娟,陈衍泰.组合评价及其计算机集成系统研究[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2007.
[36] 陈国宏,李美娟.组合评价收敛性验证的计算机模拟实验[J].系统工程理论与实践,2005,25(5):74-82.
[37] 李美娟,陈国宏,肖细凤.基于一致性组合评价的区域技术创新能力评价与比较分析[J].中国管理科学,2009,17(2):131-139.
[38] 李美娟,陈国宏,陈勃,等.基于方法集化的动态组合评价方法研究[J].中国管理科学,2013,21(2):132-136.
[39] 李美娟,陈国宏,徐林明,等.基于漂移度的动态组合评价方法研究[J].中国管理科学,2015,23(1):141-145.
