从微观低碳经济的角度出发,建立了企业在碳限额政策,碳限额与交易政策以及在碳限额与交易政策下进行绿色技术投入三种情形下的定价策略模型。研究结果表明:(1)在碳限额政策下,企业的最优定价和期望利润均不会大于在无限额下的最优定价和期望利润。(2)在碳限额与交易政策下的最优定价低于无限额下的最优定价,高于碳限额下的最优定价。此时,企业的最优定价主要取决于限额时的产品边际利润大小,企业的期望利润主要取决于政府的初始碳配额量;(3)在碳限额与交易政策下,进行绿色技术投入后的最优定价低于无限额下的最优定价,此时,企业最优定价主要取决于限额时的产品边际利润大小;(4)在碳限额与交易政策下,适当的绿色技术投入能够增加生产企业期望利润。
In recent years, the adverse impact of the carbon dioxide emissions on the climate and environment is increasing, the constraints and norms of the production and management behavior of enterprise done by government is also gradually enhanced, carbon cap and trade policy has become an important measure for the government to control and manage the carbon emissions of the enterprise, and it will has a direct impact to enterprise on production and pricing strategy.At the same time with the increasing of the public's environmental protection and health awareness, the demand for green and low carbon products will be more and more bigger for public.Green and low carbon products will be the inevitable direction of enterprise production.Under the new environment of green technology investment and low carbon production, the enterprise product pricing inevitably faces a new problem.Under the condition of carbon cap and trade and with the considering of green technology investment, the enterprise product pricing strategy has become the enterprise problems needed to resolve.Therefore, the research on carbon cap and trade policy under the enterprise production and pricing strategy has very important practical significance.Whereas in the past the study literature about the enterprise product pricing strategy from the angle of considering green technology was arely seen, and it will become the main source for us to study the problem in this paper.From the perspective of microcosmic low-carbon economy, the pricing strategy model is mainly constructed under carbon cap and trade policies, carbon quota policy, carbon cap and trade policy, and in the carbon cap and trade policy with the green technology input respectively, and then some researches on the pricing strategy for the enterprise on the three kinds of cases are given, in order to private some beneficial reference to enterprises under the condition of different corresponding pricing strategy.Under the carbon cap and trade regulation with the consideration of green technology investment, enterprise pricing strategy model is constructed, and the optimization theory and methods are used to analyze the model.Combined with the numerical analysis method the correctness of the model has been verified, and then the related conclusion is obtained.As the basis of comparative analysis, first of all, pricing strategy of the enterprise is researched in case of no carbon limit.Basis on this, according to the progressive thinking that consider the limitation of carbon, carbon quotas and trading, carbon cap and trade under the consideration of green technology input, the pricing strategy of corresponding enterprise is analyzed, and then gets the corresponding pricing strategy of the enterprise under different cases is gotten.The results show that: (1) The manufacturer's profit and price with carbon emission constraint will be lower than the case without carbon emission constraint.(2) The manufacture's maximum price under cap-and trade is lower than the case without carbon emission constraint, and higher than the case under cap.The manufacture's maximum price under cap-and-trade depends on the marginal profit in cap and The maximum expected profit in this situation depends on the initial allowance.(3)The manufacture's maximum price concerning green technology under cap-and-trade is lower than the case without carbon emission constraint.The manufacture's maximum price concerning green technology under cap-and-trade depends on the marginal profit in cap.(4)Under cap-and-trade, proper green technology input will improve manufacture's expected profit.In the part of the numerical simulation analysis, according to the enterprise product pricing strategy under the carbon cap and trade policy with considering green technology input, a numerical example is designed, and the pricing strategy of the enterprise under the stochastic market demand distribution function is analyzed, and further the correctness of the model is verified.The research of this paper provides a basic idea and framework to the related research of enterprise product pricing strategy that consider green technology input under carbon cap and trade policy, and it provides a reference for the government to consider from the angle of environment and the enterprise at the same time and formulate the carbon cap and trade policy which is good for not only the environment but also the enterprise.
[1] IPCC.Climate change 2007:The third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change[M].London:Cambridge University Press, 2007:45-50.
[2] Rehdanz K, Tol R S J.Unilateral regulation of bilateral trade in greenhouse gas emission permits[J].Ecological Economics, 2005, 54(4):397-416.
[3] Bernard A, Haurie A, Vielle M, et al.A two-level dynamic game of carbon emission trading between Russia, China, and Annex B countries[J].Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2007, 32(6):1830-1856.
[4] 骆华,赵永刚,费方域.国际碳排放权交易机制比较研究与启示[J].经济体制改革,2012,(2):153-157.
[5] Dobos I.The effects of emission trading on production and inventories in the Arrow-Karlin model[J].International Journal of Production Economics, 2005, 93-94(8):301-308.
[6] Hong Zhaofu, Chu Chengbin, Yu Yugang.Optimization of production planning for green manufacturing[C]//Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control (ICNSC), Beijing,China,April11-14, 2012.
[7] 杜少甫, 董骏峰, 梁樑, 等.考虑排放许可与交易的生产优化[J].中国管理科学,2009,17(3):81-86.
[8] 计国君,张庭溢.基于碳交易规制的易腐品订货决策研究[J].统计与决策,2013,(9):52-55.
[9] Hua Guowei, Han Qiao, Li Jian.Optimal order lot sizing and pricing with carbon trade[D].Beijing:Beijing Jiaotong University, 2011.
[10] 朱跃钊,陈红喜,赵智敏.基于B_S定价模型的碳排放权交易定价研究[J].科技进步与对策,2013,30(5):27-30.
[11] 侯玉梅,尉芳芳.碳权交易价格对闭环供应链定价的影响[J].燕山大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013,14(2):103-108.
[12] Brawn E, Wield D.Regulation as a means for the social control of technology[J].Technology Analysis & Strategic Management,1994, 6(3):259-273.
[13] 余淑均.对绿色技术内涵与类别的再思考[J].武汉工程大学学报,2007,2(9):40-42.
[14] 朱永跃,马志强,陈永清.企业绿色技术创新环境的多级模糊综合评价[J].科技进步与对策,2010,27(9):102-105.
[15] 李寿德,黄采金,顾孟迪,等.基于排污权交易的厂商污染治理新技术投资决策的期权博弈模型[J].系统管理学报,2007,16(6):66-69.
[16] Mills E S.Uncertainty and price theory[J].Quarterly Journal of Economics,1959, 73(1):116-130.
[17] Ernst R L.A linear inventory model of monopolistic firm[D]. Berkeley, CA:University of California,1970.
[18] Thowsen G T.A dynamic, nonstationary inventory problem for a price/quantity setting firm[J].Naval Res.Logistics Quart.1975, 22(3):461-476.
[19] Silver E A, Peterson R.Decision systems for inventory management and production planning[M]. New York:John Wiley, 1985.
[20] Whitin T M.Inventory control and price theory[J].Management Science.1955, 2(1):61-68.
[21] Porteus E L.Stochastic inventory theory[M]//Heyman D P, Sobel M J.Handbooks in OR & MS. North-Holland:Elsevier,1990:605-652.
[22] Zabel E.Monopoly and uncertainty[J].Review of Economic.Studies, 1970, 37(2):205-219.