我国优势金属矿产定价权的缺失对我国经济增长及经济安全产生了重要影响,这让很多学者构建相应的模型来解释定价权缺失。基于此背景,本文把代际公平均衡、社会偏好均衡与古诺模型相结合,解决代际价值补偿与策略性价值补偿计量的技术难题;并通过计量分析优势金属矿产市场的需求状况和开发税费科目,获得开发补偿的相关数据,展开理论模型结论的算例验证分析。理论模型与数值模拟结论表明,代际公平均衡与社会偏好均衡由于代际价值与策略性价值的产生,提升了我国金属矿产国际贸易市场势力,但社会偏好对市场势力影响路径并非一致,利他古诺均衡、互动公平古诺均衡变动具有一致的结果,非公平厌恶的古诺均衡具有损失厌恶特征,即在考虑非公平厌恶的古诺竞争时,古诺纳什均衡随非公平厌恶的同情和嫉妒偏好单调变换。这些结论与构建的理论模型实现了可持续发展理念与价值评价思维的有效结合,拓展了矿产资源定价权缺失的理论分析框架,为相关商品贸易的定价权解释提供了新的思路。
The lack of pricing power of preponderant metal minerals in China exerts significant impact on economic growth and economic security of our country, which causes related models established by many scholars to explain it. So in this paper, intergenerational equity equilibrium and social preferences equilibrium are combined with Cournot model to solve the technological problem of intergenerational compensation and strategic value compensation. And by calculating market demand of preponderant metal minerals and setting up tax subjects, statistics concerned development compensation could be obtained and results of theoretical model could be verified by examples. The conclusion of the theoretical model and the numerical simulation shows that intergenerational equity equilibrium and social preferences equilibrium enhance international trade market power of preponderant metal minerals owing to the production of intergenerational value and strategic value. However, the impact exerted on market power by social preference is inconsistent, that is, changes of altruistic Cournot equilibrium and reciprocal inequity Cournot equilibrium are consistent, while inequity aversion Cournot equilibrium has the characteristic of loss aversion, namely, under the consideration of inequity aversion Cournot competition, Counot-Nash equilibrium transform monotonically with sympathy and envy of inequity aversion. The conclusions and theoretical models achieve the effective combination between sustainable development concept and value evaluation thinking and expanding the theoretical framework for the lack of pricing power of mineral resources, and establish provide new thinking and analysis theoretical framework for pricing power explanation of related merchandise trade.
[1] 胡锦涛.高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜, 为夺取全面建设小康社会新胜利而奋斗-在中国共产党第十七次全国代表大会上的报告[R/OL].(2007-10-15)[2007-10-25].paper.people.com.cn/rmrb/html/2007-10/25/content_271984.htm.
[2] 胡锦涛.坚定不移沿着中国特色社会主义道路前进为全面建成小康社会而奋斗-在中国共产党第十八次全国代表大会上的报告[R/OL].(2012-11-08)[2012-11-18].www.gmw.cn/sixiang/2012-11/18/content-5725672.htm.
[3] Zhong Meirui, Chen Jieyu. Strategic equilibrium price analysis and numerical simulation of preponderant high-tech metal mineral resources[J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2013, 23(10):3153-3160.
[4] Hotelling H. The economics of exhaustible resources[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1931, 39(2): 137-175.
[5] Hartwick J M. Intergenerational Equity and the Investing of Rents from Exhaustible Resources [J]. American Economic Review, 1977, 67 (5) : 972-974.
[6] Fattouh B. OPEC pricing power: The need for a new perspective[J].Oxford University Press, 2007, 158(23).
[7] Kaufmann R K. The mechanisms for autonomous energy efficiency increases: A cointegration analysis of the US Energy/GDP ratio[J]. The Energy Journal, 2004, 25(1):63-86.
[8] Rubinstein A. Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model[J]. Econometrica, 1982, 50(1):13-21.
[9] 章洁.我国稀土产品出口定价权缺失问题与原因分析[J].北方经济, 2010, (7):66-67.
[10] 王正明, 张许静.稀土资源税对"寡头"国出口市场势力的影响研究[J].经济经纬, 2012, (2):52-55.
[11] 蒋舒, 吴冲锋.中国期货市场的有效性:过度反应和国内外市场关联的视角[J].金融研究, 2007, (2):49-62.
[12] Alexander R, Achim W, Kristina W. Bargaining and inequity aversion: On the efficiency of the double auction[J]. Economics Letters, 2012, 114(2): 178-181.
[13] Marc G, Oliver G. Inequality aversion and externalities[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2012, 84(1):111-117.
[14] Caleb C A. Inequity aversion and advantage seeking with asymmetric competition[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2013, 68: 121-136.
[15] Santos-Pinto L. Making sense of the experimental evidence on endogenous timing in duopoly markets [J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2008, 68(3): 657-666.
[16] 李真, 孟庆峰, 盛昭瀚.考虑公平关切的工期优化收益共享谈判[J].系统工程理论与实践, 2013, 33(01): 82-91.
[17] 王磊, 成克河, 王世伟.考虑公平关切的双渠道供应链定价策略研究[J].中国管理科学, 2012, (S2):563-568.