主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
论文

促进低碳产品需求的供应链减排成本分担模型

展开
  • 中南大学商学院, 湖南 长沙 410083
周艳菊(1972-),女(汉族),湖南湘潭人,中南大学商学院教授,博士生导师,研究方向: 供应链管理.

收稿日期: 2014-05-22

  修回日期: 2014-12-20

  网络出版日期: 2015-07-22

基金资助

国家自然科学基金创新研究群体科学基金资助项目(71221006);国家自然科学基金重点资助项目(71431006);国家自然科学基金面上资助项目(71171201,71171202,71471178);中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金(2011RWSK003)

Carbon Emission Reduction Cost-Sharing Model in Supply Chain Based on Improvingthe Demand for Low-Carbon Products

Expand
  • School of Business, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China

Received date: 2014-05-22

  Revised date: 2014-12-20

  Online published: 2015-07-22

摘要

减排成本的存在,导致低碳产品的零售价格偏高,市场需求偏低,从而制约低碳产品的推广。以此为背景,针对单一制造商和单一零售商构成的双边垄断供应链,建立了基于减排成本分担契约的Stackelberg模型,分析比较了有、无减排成本分担契约两种情况下订货量、供应链各成员利润及供应链整体利润变化。研究发现,引入减排成本分担契约后,低碳产品最优订货量增加,零售价格降低,且在一定条件下制造商和零售商的利润得到帕累托改进,并推导出了制造商和零售商的参与约束和最优分担率。在此基础上,进一步分析了消费者对低碳产品的认知与零售商的产品订货量、供应链整体利润呈正相关关系,与制造商承担的减排成本分担率呈负相关关系。最后结合数值分析验证了成本分担契约的有效性。

本文引用格式

周艳菊, 黄雨晴, 陈晓红, 徐选华 . 促进低碳产品需求的供应链减排成本分担模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015 , 23(7) : 85 -93 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.07.011

Abstract

For the existence of carbon emission reduction cost, the retail price of the products is so high that the market demand is low, which restricts the promotion of low-carbon products. Our motivation comes from the fact that most consumers think that the price of low-carbon products is so high that they are not willing to buy. So, how to reduce the price of low-carbon products so that the demand can be improved has become an important issue in enterprise operation. On the background of a bilateral-monopoly supply chain consisting of a single manufacturer and a single retailer, Stackelberg models are established based on the carbon emission reduction cost-sharing contract. And the backward induction is regarded as an efficient method of solving the problem. We analyze how the order quantity, the profits of supply chain members and the whole supply chain are influenced by the carbon emission reduction cost-sharing contract within the supply chain. According to the research, when the carbon emission reduction cost -sharing contract is introduced into the model, it leads a good consequence that the optimal order quantity of the low-carbon product increases, the retail price decreases, and the manufacturer and the retailer will get Pareto improvement on certain condition. On the basis, a further analysis is carried on and a conclusion shows that consumers' awareness and emotional factors of low-carbon products have a positive effect on enterprise's order quantity and profit, while have a negative effect on the optimal cost-sharing rate shared by the manufacture. Our key contribution lies in modeling the cost-sharing contract to coordinate the relationship between the manufacturer and retailer. At the same time, the supply chain member can get Pareto improvement on certain condition.

参考文献

[1] Woodley J. Reviewing the European Trade[J]. Public Utilities Fortnightly, 2007,(3): 25-29.

[2] Gajewski A, Siergiejuk J, Szulborski K. Carbon dioxide emission while heating in selected European countries[J]. Energy and Buildings, 2013, 65(10): 197-204.

[3] Wang T, Watson J. Scenario analysis of Chinas emissions pathways in the 21st century for low carbon transition[J]. Energy Policy, 2010, 38(7): 3537-3546.

[4] Vanclay J K, Shortiss J, Aulsebrook S, et al. Customer response to carbon labelling of groceries[J]. Journal of Consumer Policy, 2011, 34(1): 153-160.

[5] Suchard H T, Polonski M J. A theory of environmental buyer behaviour and its validity: the environmental action-behaviour model. Proceedings of AMA Summer Educators' Conference, Chicago, 1991, August.

[6] Kroes J, Subramanian R, Subramanyam R. Operational compliance levers, environmental performance, and firm performance under cap and trade regulation[J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2012, 14(2): 186-201.

[7] Fraj E, Martinez E. Ecological consumer behaviour: An empirical analysis[J]. International Journal of Consumer Studies,2007, 31(1): 26-33.

[8] 汪兴东, 景奉杰. 城市居民低碳购买行为模型研究——基于五个城市的调研数据[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2012, 22(2): 47-55.

[9] Zhao Huihui,Gao Qian, Wu Yaoping, et al. What affects green consumer behavior in China? A case study from Qingdao[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2014, 63(2): 143-151.

[10] Benjaafar S, Li Yanzhi, Daskin M. Carbon footprint and the management of supply chains: insights from simple models.[J]. Automation Science and Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 2013, 10(1): 99-116.

[11] Absi N, Dauzère-Pérès S, Kedad-Sidhoum S, et al. Lot sizing with carbon emission constraints[J], European Journal of Operational Research,2013, 227(1): 55-61.

[12] Hua Guowei, Cheng T C E, Wang Shouyang. Managing carbon footprints in inventory management[J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2011, 132(2): 178-185.

[13] Zhang Bin, Xu Liang. Multi-item production planning with carbon cap and trade mechanism[J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2013,144(1): 118-127.

[14] Du Shaofu, Ma Fang, Fu Zuoling, et al. Game-theoretic analysis for an emission-dependent supply chain in a ‘cap-and-trade’ system[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2015,228(1): 135-149.

[15] Liu Zugang, Anderson T D, Cruz J M. Consumer environmental awareness and competition in two-stage supply chains[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2012, 218(3): 602-613.

[16] 赵道致,原白云,徐春明.低碳供应链纵向合作减排的动态优化[J]. 控制与决策,2014,29(7):1340-1344.

[17] 王芹鹏,赵道致. 消费者低碳偏好下的供应链收益共享契约研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(9):114-122.

[18] 骆瑞玲, 范体军, 夏海洋. 碳排放交易政策下供应链碳减排技术投资的博弈分析[J].中国管理科学,2014,22(11):44-53.

[19] 庞晶,李文东.低碳消费偏好与低碳产品需求分析[J].中国人口.资源与环境,2011,9(21):76-80.

[20] 杜少甫,董骏峰,梁樑,等.考虑排放许可与交易的生产优化[J].中国管理科学,2009,17(3):81-86.
文章导航

/