目前低碳经济已经成为转变经济发展方式的战略措施之一, 碳金融业务逐渐成为金融机构助力低碳经济发展的重要金融创新领域, 而风险控制问题始终是影响金融创新成败的关键。目前中国的碳金融市场以清洁发展机制(CDM)下商业银行参与的间接金融为主导, 商业银行参与碳金融业务面临国际碳价波动、碳交易结算货币汇率波动等诸多风险, 且多源风险因子之间具有业务共生性和复杂相关性。论文选取2009-2012年美国洲际交易所(ICE)的核证减排量CERs期货价格和欧元兑人民币汇率价格作为金融时间序列的样本数据, 探究运用ARMA-GARCH模型分别刻画碳价风险和汇率风险特性的方法, 研究处理风险因子间的非线性相关关系的Copula函数方法, 构建Copula-ARMA-GARCH模型并利用Monte Carlo模拟计算碳市场多源风险的整合VaR。实证发现:碳金融市场收益率具有波动聚集性和异方差特性;潜在的碳价风险要高于汇率风险;若忽视不同风险因子之间的相关性会高估碳市场风险;政府汇率监管在一定程度上降低了碳市场的风险。研究贡献在于探究符合碳金融资产风险特征的多源风险整合度量技术, 为商业银行有效控制碳市场风险、促进碳金融创新提供理论依据。
Currently the low-carbon economy has become one of the strategic transformations of economic development measures. Carbon financial business has become an important innovation field in the financial sector that financial institutions boost the development of low-carbon economy. While the risk control is always the key factor affecting the success of financial innovation. As a developing country, China takes part in the international carbon financial transactions relying on Clean Development Mechanism (CDM). Under the CDM, indirect finance dominates carbon financial market where commercial banks play the important intermediary role. With the emerging of low-carbon economy in China, many financial institutions, especially the commercial banks, explore a lot of carbon financial business such as credit support business as CERs usufruct pledge loan, factoring financing, CDM equipment leasing, and other services as financial advisers, financial products of carbon credits, carbon accounts hosting business. Participating in the carbon finance business, banks are facing many risks as international carbon price fluctuations, carbon trading settlement currency exchange rate fluctuations and so on. And between the multi-source risk factors, a symbiotic and complexity of correlation is exist. In this paper, the carbon financial market risk of commercial banks is investigated in this paper, and ICE CERs future price and the EURO against CNY exchange rate as two risk factors financial time series sample data, which are chosen in the websites of Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) and State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) from 2009 to 2012 are selected. First, according to financial time series' feature, ARMA-GARCH models are used to portray the characterization of carbon price risk and exchange rate risk, the treatment methods for nonlinear relationship between the risk factors on Copula function are studied, and then the integrated VaR of carbon market risk through building Copula-ARMA-GARCH model and Monte Carlo simulation is calculated. Our empirical study shows that:(1) Financial time series of carbon price and exchange rate are both volatility clustering and heteroscedasticity. (2) Compared with risk factors' VaR, carbon price risk is higher than exchange rate risk in the carbon transactions. (3) If the correlation of carbon market risk factors is ignored, risk will be overestimated. (4) Supervision on exchange rate can reduce carbon market risk in a certain extent.This article contributes to find out amulti-source risks integration measurement technique to accord with the characteristic of carbon financial assets price volatility. The carbon financial risk factors have various sources and symbiotic, therefore, portraying the characteristics of risk factors respectively then the integration provides a theoretical framework for the multi-source risk measurement research; it provides theoretical basis for commercial banks to control the carbon market risks effectively, and promote carbon finance innovation.
[1] 张跃军, 魏一鸣. 国际碳期货价格的均值回归:基于EU ETS的实证分析[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2011, 31(2):214-220.
[2] 战雪丽, 张世英. 金融风险管理及其度量方法进展研究[J]. 西安电子科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2006, 16(2):23-26.
[3] 魏一鸣. 碳金融与碳市场-方法与实证[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2010.
[4] Chevallier J. Detecting instability in the volatility of carbon prices [J]. Energy Economics, 2011, 33(1):99-110.
[5] 杨超, 李国良, 门明. 国际碳交易市场的风险度量及对我国的启示——基于状态转移与极值理论的VaR比较研究[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2011, 28(4):94-109.
[6] 刘维泉, 郭兆晖. EU ETS 碳排放期货市场风险度量——基于 SV 模型的实证分析[J]. 系统工程, 2012, 29(10):14-23.
[7] Sklar A. Fonctions de repartition à n dimensions et leurs marges [J]. Publication de l'Institut de Statistique l'Universite Paris, 1959, 8:229-231.
[8] Nelson R B. An introduction to Copulas [M]. New York:Springer-Verlag, 1999.
[9] Embrechts P, McNeil A, Straumann D. Correlation:Piflails and alternatives [J]. RISK, 1999, 12(5):11-21.
[10] Bouyé E, Durrleman V, Nikeghbali A, et al. Copulas for finance:A reading guide and some applications[R]. Working Paper, Financial Econometrics Research Centre, City University Business School, 2000.
[11] Roekinger M, Jondeau E. Conditional dependency of financial series:An application of copulas[J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2003, 27(10):1699-1737.
[12] Breymann W, Dias A, Embrechts P. Dependence structures for multivariate high-frequency data in finance [J]. Quantitative Finance, 2003, 3(1):1-14.
[13] 韦艳华, 张世英. 金融市场的相关性分析——Copula-GARCH 模型及其应用[J]. 系统工程, 2004, 22(4):7-12.
[14] 周艳菊, 彭俊, 王宗润. 基于Bayesian-Copula方法的商业银行操作风险度量[J]. 中国管理科学, 2011, 19(4):17-25.
[15] 李建平, 丰吉闯, 宋浩, 等. 风险相关性下的信用风险, 市场风险和操作风险集成度量[J]. 中国管理科学, 2010, 18(1):18-25.
[16] 柏满迎, 孙禄杰. 三种 Copula2-Va R 计算方法与[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2007, (2):154-160.
[17] 黄在鑫, 覃正. 中美主要金融市场相关结构及风险传导路径研究——基于 Copula 理论与方法[J]. 国际金融研究, 2012, (5):74-82.