主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
论文

基于演化博弈模型的企业集团母子公司治理研究

展开
  • 中南大学商学院, 湖南 长沙 410083
曾江洪(1968-),男(汉族),湖南茶陵人,中南大学商学院教授,博士生导师,管理科学与工程博士,研究方向:公司治理、管理决策模型与方法、中小企业融资.

收稿日期: 2012-06-23

  修回日期: 2013-01-13

  网络出版日期: 2015-02-28

基金资助

国家创新研究群体科学基金资助项目(71221061);湖南省社科基金项目(12JDZ35)

Study on Parent-subsidiary Corporation Governance of Enterprise Groups Based on Evolutionary Game

Expand
  • Business School of Central South University, Changsha 410083, China

Received date: 2012-06-23

  Revised date: 2013-01-13

  Online published: 2015-02-28

摘要

母子公司治理是企业集团治理的核心问题,集团内母子公司相互联系又相对独立的关系产生了新的治理问题,成为影响企业集团发挥整体优势的难题。本文运用演化博弈分析模型,充分考虑治理的动态性及子公司能动性对治理的影响,研究企业集团治理中母公司对子公司监督策略选择与子公司策略选择的互动机制,并对影响该系统演化过程稳定的重要因素进行分析,为解决企业集团母子公司间委托代理问题提供一种新的思路。研究结果表明博弈过程在3种情况下存在演化稳定策略,而不存在最优的稳定策略。通过设计合理的激励机制,如在对子公司的激励中引入提成比与子公司为集团创造收益正相关的业绩提成报酬、增加处罚力度、采取定期或不定期抽查等方式,可影响母子公司策略选择的调整速度,使博弈向(集团利益最大化、不监督)的策略演化,促进母子公司之间建立起一种互信互利的良好关系,增加集团整体收益,发挥企业集团的整体优势。

本文引用格式

曾江洪, 崔晓云 . 基于演化博弈模型的企业集团母子公司治理研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015 , 23(2) : 148 -153 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.02.018

Abstract

With the development of information & knowledge economy and the deepening of economic globalization, Chinese businesses are facing increasingly competitive pressure from the world. Construction of large enterprise groups is becoming a trend. At the same time, with the increase of mergers and acquisitions, and the further expansion of multinational corporations, governance problem brought by the complexity of the enterprise groups is urgent to be solved. Corporate governance should span a single corporate governance boundary, to expand enterprise dimensions, implementation from "Corporate "governance to "group" governance breakthrough.Parent-subsidiary corporate governance is the core issue of corporate governance, parent companies and subsidiaries within the group interconnected and relatively independent relationship has produced a new governance issue, become a problem that influence enterprise groups to exert the overall advantages. In this paper, by using evolutionary game analysis model, and fully considering the dynamic nature of governance and its subsidiary initiative on governance, the mechanism of interaction between supervision strategy of the subsidiary to the parent company and the strategy selection strategy of subsidiary is studied, and the important factors affecting the evolution stability of the system were analyzed.The corporate governance theory is enriched, and a new idea to solve the principal-agent problem between the parent and subsidiary is offered.The results show that the process of the game existed evolutionary stable strategy in 3 cases, but there is no optimal stable strategy. The strategy choices depend on each other's strategy selection probability, the final equilibrium state depends on the parent company learning adjustment speed. Through the design of a reasonable incentive mechanism, such as the introduction of the percentage ratio α that positively related to the income created by the subsidiaries of the group, to increase penalties, take regular or irregular spot checks and other means, the parent-subsidiary company strategy adjustment speed can be affected, the game will turn to the strategy evolution evolution that group profit is the biggest change, or that there is no supervision.And a good relations of mutual trust and benefit between parent company and subsidiary is promoted, the group overall income is increased, the overall superiority of enterprise groups will be strengthen.

参考文献

[1] 李维安,武立东.企业集团的公司治理——规模起点、治理边界及子公司治理[J].南开管理评论,1999,(4):4-8.

[2] Genus A, Coles A M. Firm strategies for risk management in innovation [J].International Journal of Innovation Management,2006,10(2):113-126.

[3] 陈仕华,郑文全.公司治理理论的最新进展:一个新的分析框架[J].管理世界,2010,(2):156-166.

[4] Ghauri P. New struture in MNCs based in small countries:A network approsch[J].European Management Journal,1992,10(3):357-364.

[5] Faccio M,Lang L H P. The ultimate ownership of western european corporations[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,2002,65(3):365-395.

[6] Morck R, Wolfenzon D, Yeung B. Corporate governance, economic entrenchment and growth[J]. Journal of Economic Literature,2005,43(3):655-720.

[7] Khanna T, Yafeh Y. Business groups in emerging markets: Paragons or Parasites [J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 2007,45(2):331-372.

[8] Durlauf S N, Blume L E,The new palgrave dictionary off econmics[M].Zne ed.London:Palgrave Macmillan,2008.

[9] 王昶,姚海琳,唐健雄.母子公司管理控制行为风格与企业绩效关系研究[J].软科学,2010,24(11):102-106.

[10] 陈林,周宗放,顾婧.基于复合期权、篮子期权及股权关系的企业集团母公司信用风险度量研究[J].中国管理科学,2011,19(5):167-172.

[11] 潘爱玲,吴有红.企业集团内部控制框架的构建及应用研究[J].中国工业经济,2005,(8):105-114.

[12] 曾江洪,企业社会责任、社会资本与公司治理[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2012.

[13] 肖条军,盛昭瀚,程书萍.组建横向型企业集团抉择的博弈分析[J],管理科学学报,2004,7(5):18-23.

[14] 马胜,周思伟.企业集团治理中母子公司的利益博弈[J].求索,2011,(4):12-14.

[15] 吴炯,彭飞.公司治理结构演进的进化博弈分析[J].管理工程学报,2004,18(2):114-116.

[16] 郭本海,方志耕,刘卿.基于演化博弈的区域高耗能产业退出机制研究[J].中国管理科学,2012,20(4):79-85.

[17] 许民利,王俏,欧阳林寒.食品供应链中质量投入的演化博弈分析[J].中国管理科学,2012,20(5):131-141.
文章导航

/