基于投入产出规模的省际碳排放配额分配研究

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.0040

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 碳排放交易机制是解决全球气候变暖的有效措施，其中碳排放配额的初始分配一直是碳排放交易机制建立过程中的难点。现有的基于DEA方法的碳排放配额分配大多是基于效率的分配，而没有考虑各省份的投入产出规模。为了保证投入产出规模的测量被各省份接受，本文提出了一种基于共同权重的DEA方法分配我国各省份的碳排放配额。研究结果表明，不同类型的规模分配方法得到的分配比例不同，只有基于投入产出规模的分配方法不仅能同时考虑各省份的投入和产出，而且能够提高分配后的效率。该基于投入产出规模的碳排放配额分配方式更容易被各省份所接受，并能为国家分配碳配额提供一个新的视角。

关键词: 碳配额分配；投入产出规模；DEA模型；共同权重

Abstract: The carbon emission trading mechanism has been found to play an important role in tackling climate change as the carbon emissions costs are included in the financial decision making. The initial allocation of carbon emission allowances has always been a difficult point in the establishment of the carbon trading mechanism. Three typical methods have been adopted for the allocation when the market information is complete and undistorted: grandfathering, benchmarking and auctioning. However, the ideal decision-making environment required by these methods does not often exist in the real world. Based on this, data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach can provide an alternative perspective to the carbon emissions allocation problems as it is based on an empirical production function derived from observed historical input and output data.

Key words: carbon emission allowance allocation; input-output scale; DEA model; common set of weights

中图分类号:

F224.31

冯青, 吴志彬, 徐玖平. 基于投入产出规模的省际碳排放配额分配研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(3): 268-276.

FENG Qing, WU Zhi-bin, XU Jiu-ping. Research on Inter-provincial Carbon Emission Allowance Allocation Based on Input-output Scale[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(3): 268-276.

参考文献

［1］ Olsen D J, Dvorkin Y, Fernández-Blanco R, et al. Optimal carbon taxes for emissions targets in the electricity sector［J］. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2018,33(6): 5892-5901.
［2］ Pigou A C.The economics of welfare［M］.Macmillan,1920.
［3］ World B, Ecofys, Vivid E. State and trends of carbon pricing［R］.World Bank, 2017.
［4］ He Ping, Zhang Wei, Xu Xiaoyan, et al. Production lot-sizing and carbon emissions under cap-and-trade and carbon tax regulations［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 103(15): 241-248.
［5］ Stavins R N. Experience with market-based environmental policy instruments［J］. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 1999, 3(1): 355-435.
［6］邹清明, 胡李庆, 邹霆钧. 碳限额与碳交易机制下考虑公平关切的供应链定价与协调研究［J］. 中国管理科学, 2022,30(10): 142-154.Zou Qingming, Hu Liqing, Zou Tingjun. Pricing and coordination of a supply chain with fairness concerns under carbon cap-and-trade mechanism［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science,2022, 30(10): 142-154.
［7］ Clò S, Battles S, Zoppoli P. Policy options to improve the effectiveness of the EU emissions trading system: a multi-criteria analysis［J］. Energy Policy, 2013,57: 477-490.
［8］何永贵, 闫家琦. 基于效率与公平的我国区域碳排放权初始分配研究［J］. 华北电力大学学报(社会科学版), 2020(5): 26-32.He Yonggui, Yan Jiaqi. Initial allocation of regional carbon emission rights in China based on efficiency and equity［J］. Journal of North China Electric Power University (social sciences)， 2020(5): 26-32.
［9］刘海英, 王钰. 基于历史法和零和DEA方法的用能权与碳排放权初始分配研究［J］. 中国管理科学, 2020,28(9):209-220.Liu Haiying, Wang Yu. Research on initial allocation of energy-consuming right and CO2-emission right based on historical method and ZSG-DEA method［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020,28(9): 209-220.
［10］ Zetterberg L. Benchmarking in the European union emissions trading system: Abatement incentives［J］. Energy Economics, 2014,43:218-224.
［11］王明喜,李明,郭冬梅,等.碳排放权的非对称拍卖模型及其配置效率［J］.管理科学学报,2019,22(7): 34-51.Wang Mingxi, Li Ming, Guo Dongmei, et al. An asymmetric auction model of carbon emission rights and its allocation efficiency［J］. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2019,22(7): 34-51.
［12］ Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units［J］. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978,2(6): 429-444.
［13］ Zhou Xiaoyang, Xu Zhongwen, Chai Jian, et al. Efficiency evaluation for banking systems under uncertainty: a multi-period three-stage DEA model. Omega, 2019, 85: 68-82.
［14］宋杰鲲,吕高天,梁璐璐,等.基于零和收益DEA的省域能耗、大气污染物和碳排放控制目标联合分配研究［J］.中国石油大学学报(社会科学版),2020,36(3):16-24.Song Jiekun, Lv Gaotian, Liang Lulu, et al. Joint distribution of the control targets of provincial energy consumption，air pollutant and carbon emissions based on ZSG-DEA model［J］. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Social Sciences), 2020,36(3): 16-24.
［15］ Gomes E G, Lins M P E. Modelling undesirable outputs with zero sum gains data envelopment analysis models［J］. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2008,59(5): 616-623.
［16］ Cook W D, Kress M. Characterizing an equitable allocation of shared costs: A DEA approach［J］. European Journal of Operational Research, 1999,119(3): 652-661.
［17］ Jahanshahloo G R, Sadeghi J, Khodabakhshi M. Proposing a method for fixed cost allocation using DEA based on the efficiency invariance and common set of weights principles［J］. Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, 2017,85(2): 223-240.
［18］ Beasley J. Allocating fixed costs and resources via data envelopment analysis［J］. European Journal of Operational Research, 2003, 147(1): 198-216.
［19］ Li Yong, Li Feng, Emrouznejad A, et al. Allocating the fixed cost: an approach based on data envelopment analysis and cooperative game［J］. Annals of Operations Research, 2019, 274(1-2): 373-394.
［20］ An Qingxian, Wen Yao, Xiong Beibei, et al. Allocation of carbon dioxide emission permits with the minimum cost for Chinese provinces in big data environment［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017,142: 886-893.
［21］ Xie Qiwei, Hu Ping, Jiang An, et al. Carbon emissions allocation based on satisfaction perspective and data envelopment analysis［J］. Energy Policy, 2019,132: 254-264.
［22］ Li Feng, Emrouznejad A, Yang Guoliang, et al. Carbon emission abatement quota allocation in Chinese manufacturing industries: an integrated cooperative game data envelopment analysis approach［J］. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2020,71(8): 1259-1288.
［23］ Li Feng, Zhu Qingyuan, Chen Zhi. Allocating a fixed cost across the decision making units with two-stage network structures［J］. Omega, 2019,83:139-154.
［24］ Li Feng, Zhu Qingyuan, Chen Zhi. Allocating a fixed cost across the decision making units with two-stage network structures［J］. Omega, 2019,83: 139-154.
［25］ Feldman M, Tamir T. Conflicting congestion effects in resource allocation Games［J］. Operations Research, 2008,60(3): 109-117.
［26］ Cook W D, Roll Y, Kazakov A. A DEA model for measuring the relative efficiency of highway maintenance patrols［J］. INFOR, 1990,28(2): 113-124.
［27］ Roll Y, Cook W D, Golany B. Controlling factor weights in data envelopment analysis［J］. IIE Transactions, 1991,23(1): 2-9.
［28］ Hosseinzadeh Lotfi F, Jahanshahloo G R, Memariani A. A method for finding common set of weights by multiple objective programming in data envelopment analysis［J］. Southwest Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 2000,1: 44-54.
［29］ Amin G R, Toloo M. Finding the most efficient DMUs in DEA: An improved integrated model［J］. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2007, 52(1): 71-77.
［30］ Liu Fuh-Hwa Franklin, Peng Hao Hsuan. Ranking of units on the DEA frontier with common weights［J］. Computers & Operations Research, 2008,35(5): 1624-1637.
［31］ Jahanshahloo G R, Hosseinzadeh Lotfi F, Khanmohammadi M, et al. Ranking of units by positive ideal DMU with common weights［J］. Expert Systems with Applications, 2010,37(12): 7483-7488.
［32］ Kao Chiang. Malmquist productivity index based on common-weights DEA: the case of Taiwan forests after reorganization［J］. Omega, 2010,38(6): 484-491.
［33］ Hatami-Marbini A, Tavana M, Agrell P J, et al. A common-weights DEA model for centralized resource reduction and target setting［J］. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2015,79: 195-203.
［34］ Davoodi A, Rezai H Z. Common set of weights in data envelopment analysis: A linear programming problem［J］. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 2012,20(2): 355-365.
［35］ Charnes A, Cooper W W. Programming with linear fractional functions［J］. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly,1968, 9: 181-185.
［36］王荧, 王应明. 基于未来效率的兼顾公平与效率的资源分配DEA模型研究——以各省碳排放额分配为例［J］. 中国管理科学, 2019,27(5): 161-173.Wang Ying, Wang Yingming. Study on resource allocation DEA model based on the future efficiency with consideration of efficiency & equity: An application in distribution of carbon emission rights in each Chinese province. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019,27(5): 161-173.
［37］单豪杰. 中国资本存量K的再估算:1952～2006年［J］. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2008,25(10): 17-31.Shan Haojie. Reestimating the capital stock of China: 1952-2006. The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics 2008,25(10): 17-31.

[1]	李剑，易兰，肖瑶. 信息不对称下基于区块链驱动的供应链减排信息共享机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(10): 131-139.
[2]	王荧, 王应明. 基于未来效率的兼顾公平与效率的资源分配DEA模型研究——以各省碳排放额分配为例[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(5): 161-173.
[3]	王有森, 许皓, 卞亦文. 工业用水系统效率评价:考虑污染物可处理特性的两阶段DEA[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(3): 169-176.
[4]	董进全, 邱程程, 马占新, 刘俊华, 郑治华. 拟凹生产函数的分区域估计[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(3): 32-41.
[5]	李萍, 李楚霖. R&D成果转让合同履约的定量分析:激励对策与优效设计[J]. 中国管理科学, 2004, (2): 133-138.