基于政府回收处理基金的O2O在线回收企业回收再售策略研究

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.0303

中国管理科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (12): 42-52.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.0303

基于政府回收处理基金的O2O在线回收企业回收再售策略研究

李增禄¹, 郭强², 聂佳佳²

1.河南大学商学院，河南开封475004； 2.西南交通大学经济管理学院，四川成都610031

收稿日期:2019-03-07 修回日期:2019-07-30 发布日期:2021-12-28
通讯作者: 李增禄(1991-)，男(汉族)，河南宝丰人，河南大学商学院，讲师，研究方向：物流与供应链管理、合作广告优化分析，Email:li_zenglu@126.com. E-mail:li_zenglu@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71672153)；河南大学博士科研启动项目(CJ3050A0240904)

The Recycling and Resale Strategies of the Online Recycler Based on Government Fund Policy

LI Zeng-lu¹, GUO Qiang², NIE Jia-jia²

1. School of Business, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China;2. School of Economics and Management, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China

Received:2019-03-07 Revised:2019-07-30 Published:2021-12-28
Contact: 李增禄 E-mail:li_zenglu@126.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研究了政府处理基金对O2O在线回收企业回收再售策略的影响，研究发现：当政府对制造商征收的处理基金较低时，随着补贴水平的增大，在线回收企业回收再售策略依次为：部分回收全部再售、部分回收部分再售、部分回收无再售以及全部回收无再售。若处理基金征收额度进一步增大，则部分回收部分再售策略将分化为部分回收部分再售和全部回收部分再售；而部分回收无再售策略将转变为全部回收无再售。当政府处理基金较高时，在线回收企业选择全部回收，但再售策略随政府补贴的增大依次为：全部再售、部分再售和无再售。进一步分析发现，制造商与在线回收企业利润都在政府处理基金较低，而补贴水平较高的全部回收无再售策略下取得全局最优，此时回收量也最大。此外，还发现政府处理基金和补贴会对消费者剩余造成负面影响。

关键词: 政府处理基金；O2O在线回收；再售；消费者剩余

Abstract: With the rapid development of internet, some companies, like aihuishou (www.aihuishou.com), huishouge (www.huishouge.cn), yijiwang (www.58yiji.com) and so on can collect the waste products from the consumers through the online channel. Online recycling in O2O (Online and Offline) has a key different from the traditional wisdoms of remanufacturing, the recycled products can be sold by the online recyclers to consumer as second-hand goods. Moreover, with the implementation of the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR), the manufacturer is required to pay a certain fund for the recycling of the product, according to the Regulations on the Recycling and Disposal of Waste Electrical and Electronic Products, and this fund will be distributed to the recycler in the form of subsidies. Motived by this, the influence of the government fund policy on the resale strategies of online recycler is explored.

Key words: government fund policy; O2O online recycling; resale; consumer surplus

中图分类号:

F270.5

李增禄, 郭强, 聂佳佳. 基于政府回收处理基金的O2O在线回收企业回收再售策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(12): 42-52.

LI Zeng-lu, GUO Qiang, NIE Jia-jia. The Recycling and Resale Strategies of the Online Recycler Based on Government Fund Policy[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(12): 42-52.

参考文献

［1］李新然, 陈蓉. 基于政府基金政策的再制造闭环供应链最优决策研究［J］. 管理评论, 2015, 27(10): 183-194.Li Xinran, Chen Rong. Optimal decisions of remanufacturing closed-loop supply chain based on the government fund［J］. Management Review, 2015, 27(10): 183-194.
［2］马祖军, 胡书, 代颖. 政府规制下混合渠道销售/回收的电器电子产品闭环供应链决策［J］. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(1): 82-90.Ma Zujun, Hu Shu, Dai Ying. Decision models for a closed-loop supply chain with hybrid sale/collection channels for electrical and electronic equipment under government regulations［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2016, 24(1): 82-90.
［3］余福茂, 钟永光, 沈祖志. 考虑政府引导激励的电子废弃物回收处理决策模型研究［J］. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(5): 131-137.Yu Fumao, Zhong Yongguang, Shen Zuzhi. Decision model on e-waste collecting and recycling considering the leading of government’s premium mechanisms［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2014, 22(5): 131-137.
［4］公彦德, 达庆利, 占济舟. 基于处理基金和拆解补贴的电器电子产品 CLSC 研究［J］. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(6): 97-105.Gong Yande, Da Qingli, Zhan, Jizhou. Research on closed-loop supply chain based on processing funds and dismantling subsidies［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2016, 24(6): 97-105.
［5］ Mitra S, Webster S. Competition in remanufacturing and the effects of government subsidies［J］. International Journal of Production Economics, 2008, 111(2): 287-298.
［6］ Wang Kangzhou, Zhao Yingxue, Cheng Yonghong, et al. Cooperation or competition? Channel choice for a remanufacturing fashion supply chain with government subsidy［J］. Sustainability, 2014, 6(10): 7292-7310.
［7］夏西强, 朱庆华, 赵森林. 政府补贴下制造/再制造竞争机理研究［J］. 管理科学学报, 2017, 20(4): 71-83.Xia Xiqiang, Zhu Qinghua, Zhao Senlin. Competition mechanism of manufacture/remanufacture considering government subsidies［J］. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2017, 20(4): 71-83.
［8］赵晓敏, 尤佳静, 李远勤, 等. 政府基金政策对 WEEE 回收处理的引导作用及效果分析［J］. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(8): 42-53.Zhao Xiaomin, You Jiajing, Li Yuanqin, et al. The effect of government fund policy in promoting WEEE recycling［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(8): 42-53.
［9］王玉燕, 申亮. 回收处理基金下闭环供应链的多元化主导模式［J］. 系统工程理论与实践, 2018, 38(10): 2526-2541.Wang Yuyan, Shen Liang. Diversified dominant modes of closed-loop supply chain under the recycling fund［J］. Systems Engineering Theory & Practice, 2018, 38(10): 2526-2541.
［10］刘慧慧, 黄涛, 雷明. 废旧电器电子产品双渠道回收模型及政府补贴作用研究［J］. 中国管理科学, 2013, 21(2): 123-131.Liu Huihui, Huang Tao, Lei Ming. Dual-channel recycling model of waste electrical and electronic equipment and research on effects of government subsidy［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2013, 21(2): 123-131.
［11］刘慧慧, 刘涛. 电器电子产品基金补贴和市场合作对正规回收渠道的影响研究［J］. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(5): 87-96.Liu Huihui, Liu Tao. The effects of subsidy from WEEE fund and market cooperation on formal recycling channel［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017, 25(5): 87-96.
［12］ Liu Huihui, Lei Ming, Deng Honghui, et al. A dual channel, quality-based price competition model for the WEEE recycling market with government subsidy［J］. Omega, 2016, 59(partB): 290-302.
［13］夏西强, 朱庆华, 王慧军. 政府不同策略下报废汽车正规与非正规回收渠道博弈模型［J］. 系统管理学报, 2017, 26 (3): 583-591.Xia Xiqiang, Zhu Qinghua, Wang Huijun. Game model for end-of-life vehicles between formal recycling channels and informal recycling channel based on governmental different policies［J］. Journal of Systems & Management, 2017, 26 (3): 583-591.
［14］徐兵, 杨金梅. 闭环供应链竞争下政府补贴效率研究［J］. 管理工程学报, 2013, 27(4): 178-185.Xu Bing, Yang Jinmei. The efficiency of government subsidy for closed-loop supply chains［J］. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2013, 27(4): 178-185.
［15］ Hong I H, Lee Y T, Chang P Y. Socially optimal and fund-balanced advanced recycling fees and subsidies in a competitive forward and reverse supply chain［J］. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 2014,82(1): 75-85.
［16］孙浩, 张桂涛, 钟永光, 等. 政府补贴下制造商回收的多期闭环供应链网络均衡［J］. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(1): 56-64.Sun Hao, Zhang Guitao, Zhong Yongguang, et al. The equilibrium of multi-period closed-loop supply chain network with manufacturer collection channel under government subsidies［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015, 23(1): 56-64.
［17］ Huang Yanting, Wang Zongjun. Demand disruptions, pricing and production decisions in a closed-loop supply chain with technology licensing［J］. Journal of cleaner production, 2018, 191: 248-260.
［18］刘永胜, 何梁, 徐广妹. 基于制造商利他偏好的闭环供应链价格决策研究［J］. 数学的实践与认识, 2019, 49 (1): 99-109.Liu Yongsheng, He Liang, Xu Guangshu. Research on price decision of closed-loop supply chain based on manufacturer’s altruistic preference［J］. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2019, 49 (1): 99-109.
［19］聂佳佳, 熊璐洁. 新产品质量对闭环供应链再制造模式选择的影响［J］. 工业工程, 2018, 21(5): 31-39+63.Nie Jiajia, Xiong Lujie. Effect of new product quality on remanufacturing models in closed-loop supply chain［J］. Industrial Engineering Journal, 2018, 21(5): 31-39+63.
［20］ Xu J, Hsu V N, Niu B. The impacts of markets and tax on a multinational firm’s procurement strategy in China［J］. Production and Operations Management, 2018, 27(2): 251-264.

[1]	闫泓序，余顺坤，林依青. 我国工业电力用户价值画像模型构建与应用研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(10): 224-235.
[2]	刘琳, 王玖河. 基于知识结构的顾客知识共享激励机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(8): 241-248.
[3]	李增禄, 郭强, 聂佳佳. 基于风险规避的双渠道制造商在线推介策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(7): 112-121.
[4]	陈占夺. 价格和成本波动对CoPS合约方不合作行为影响的演化分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(5): 157-168.
[5]	石岿然, 浦珏, 孙玉玲. 平台介入的多物流服务提供商合作模式研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(4): 78-85.
[6]	周茂森, 但斌. 竞争环境下存在规模经济的集团采购供应链协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(2): 98-110.
[7]	高鹏, 杜建国, 聂佳佳, 陆玉梅. 消费者后悔预期对竞争型再制造供应链权力结构的影响[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(1): 78-87.
[8]	曾江洪, 崔晓云. 基于演化博弈模型的企业集团母子公司治理研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(2): 148-153.
[9]	董效林. 企业战略三维坐标体系及其风险测度[J]. 中国管理科学, 2013, 21(5): 184-192.
[10]	叶泽, 袁玮志, 张新华, 王亚莉. 限制性定价策略中在位厂商的最优产量选择[J]. 中国管理科学, 2013, 21(3): 88-95.
[11]	聂佳佳, 熊中楷, 曹俊. 双寡头市场中品牌广告竞争和大类广告合作策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2010, 18(2): 134-142.
[12]	钟昌宝, 魏晓平, 聂茂林, 姜殿玉. 一种考虑风险的供应链利益两阶段分配法——正交投影熵值法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2010, 18(2): 68-74.
[13]	倪得兵, 戴春爱, 唐小我. 战略过程：一个基于决策的数理模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2010, 18(1): 1-8.

基于政府回收处理基金的O2O在线回收企业回收再售策略研究

The Recycling and Resale Strategies of the Online Recycler Based on Government Fund Policy

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 13

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0