两级再制造的S-M闭环供应链的决策与绩效分析

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.201.06.015

中国管理科学 ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (6): 118-125.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.201.06.015

两级再制造的S-M闭环供应链的决策与绩效分析

丁斌, 马海庆

中国科学技术大学管理学院, 安徽合肥 230026

收稿日期:2013-01-22 修回日期:2013-11-30 出版日期:2015-06-20 发布日期:2015-07-22
作者简介:丁斌(1962-),男(汉族),安徽怀宁人,中国科学技术大学管理学院副教授,研究方向:物流与供应链管理、信息管理、生产运作管理.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71110107024);国家自然科学基金资助项目(71171182)

Decision-making and Performance Analysis of S-M Closed -Loop Supply Chain with Two-Echelon Remanufacturing

DING Bin, MA Hai-qing

School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China

Received:2013-01-22 Revised:2013-11-30 Online:2015-06-20 Published:2015-07-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 供应商是再制造战略研究中不可忽视的决策主体之一,因为制造商的产品回收再制造战略会对供应商的零部件供应决策产生影响,而且处于强势背景的供应商也有选择是否参与零部件的回收再制造的权利。为了探讨产品和零部件的两级再制造战略对供应商和零售商的定价决策及收益的影响,本文运用Stackelberg博弈,对供应商强势背景下供应商选择参与和选择不参与零部件的回收再制造的两种Supplier-Manufacturer闭环供应链模型进行了研究,并对两种情形下的定价决策与收益进行了对比分析。最后得出以下结论:再制造战略对批发价决策的影响与产品的市场需求状况有关,对零售价决策的影响与回收风险状况有关;供应商应积极参与两级再制造战略,因为供应商选择供应可再制造的零部件使自身受益,并且参与零部件的回收再制造可以在降低批发价和零售价的基础上使双方受益。最后,运用数值算例验证了本文的研究结论,丰富了再制造战略对定价决策及收益影响的研究成果。

关键词: 再制造, 两级再制造, S-M闭环供应链, 定价决策

Abstract: Suppliers are decision-makers which can't be ignored in the studies of remanufacturing, because the suppliers' decision would be influenced by the manufacturers' product remanufacturing strategy, and the suppliers have a choice whether to participate the parts remanufacturing or not under supplier-dominated. In order to discuss the influence of two-echelon remanufacturing (product remanufacturing and parts remanufacturing) on the members' pricing decision and revenues, Stackelberg game theory is used to analyze two models according to whether the supplier is involved in the parts remanufacturing or not, then a comparative analysis on the pricing decisions and revenues is made. Finally, the following conclusions are drawn from this paper: with the implementation of remanufacturing strategy, the pricing decision of wholesale price relate to the demand situation, and the pricing decision of retail price relate to the recycling risk situation; The supplier should take an active part in the two-echelon remanufacturing strategy, because it is beneficial for the supplier to provide parts that can be used to remanufacture, and it will not only increase the both members' revenues but also reduce the both wholesale price and retail price if the supplier takes part in the activity of parts remanufacturing. Finally, the conclusions are demonstrated by a numerical example. The research results about the impacts of remanufacturing strategies on pricing decisions and revenues are enriched.

Key words: remanufacturing, two-echelon remanufacturing, S-M closed-loop supply chain, pricing decision

中图分类号:

C931

丁斌, 马海庆. 两级再制造的S-M闭环供应链的决策与绩效分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(6): 118-125.

DING Bin, MA Hai-qing. Decision-making and Performance Analysis of S-M Closed -Loop Supply Chain with Two-Echelon Remanufacturing[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015, 23(6): 118-125.

参考文献

[1] Minner S, Kleber R. Optimal control of production and remanufacturing in a simple recovery model with linear cost functions[J]. OR Spectrum, 2001, 23(1):3-24.

[2] Kiesmuller G P. A new approach for controlling a hybrid stochastic manufacturing/remanufacturing system with inventories and different leadtimes[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2003, 147(1):62-71.

[3] Mahadevan B, Pyke D F. Periodic review, push inventory policies for remanufacturing[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2003, 151(3):536-551.

[4] 赵昱卿,王东,奚立峰. 制造与再制造决策的优化[J]. 工业工程与管理,2003,8(02):18-21.

[5] 顾巧论, 季建华. 基于市场的再制造/制造系统集成库存随机最优控制研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2006,26(01):53-59.

[6] 史成东,陈菊红,郭福利,等. Loss-averse闭环供应链协调[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2011,31(9):1668-1673.

[7] Ferguson M, Guide V D R, Souzag C. Supply chain coordination for false failure returns[J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2006, 8(4): 376-393.

[8] Savaskan R C, Bhattacharya S, Wassenhove L N V. Closed-loop supply chain models with product remanufacturing[J]. Management Science, 2004,50(2):239-252.

[9] Savaskan R C, Van Wassenhove L N. Reverse channel design: The case of competing retailers[J]. Management Science, 2006,52(1):1-14.

[10] Ferrer G, Swaminathan J M. Managing new and remanufactured Products[J]. Management Science, 2006,52(1):15-26.

[11] Geyer R, Van Wassenhove L N, Atasu A. The economics of remanufacturing under limited component durability and finite product life cycles[J]. Management Science, 2007,53(1):88-100.

[12] Oraiopoulos N, Ferguson M E, Toktay L B. Relicensing as a secondary market Strategy. Management Science[J]. 2012,58(5):1022-1037.

[13] 易余胤. 基于再制造的闭环供应链博弈模型[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2009,29(8):28-35.

[14] 王文宾, 达庆利, 聂锐. 考虑渠道权力结构的闭环供应链定价与协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2011,19(5):29-36.

[15] 赵晓敏,林英晖,苏承明. 不同渠道权利结构下的S—M两级闭环供应链绩效分析[J].中国管理科学,2012,20(02):78-86.

两级再制造的S-M闭环供应链的决策与绩效分析

Decision-making and Performance Analysis of S-M Closed -Loop Supply Chain with Two-Echelon Remanufacturing

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	赵晓敏, 孟潇潇. 授权模式下制造商与再制造商的演化博弈决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(2): 129-136.
[2]	李巍, 张汉江, 杨柳. 基于市场划分的再制造许可费对定价策略的影响[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(6): 94-103.
[3]	孙浩, 王磊, 李晨, 胡劲松, 钟永光, 达庆利. 回收模式相异的零售商主导型闭环供应链竞争模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(4): 86-98.
[4]	马鹏, 杜宛京, 王海燕. 顾客策略行为下差异产品两阶段定价模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(2): 136-144.
[5]	魏强, 李胜. 公平偏好对横纵向供应链定价及其绩效的影响[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(2): 205-216.
[6]	范丹丹, 徐琪, 程方正. 考虑退货影响的品牌商O2O渠道选择与决策优化[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(11): 138-148.
[7]	张桂涛, 曲箫宇, 戴更新, 胡劲松, 王永波, 孙浩. 考虑再制造设计水平的多期闭环供应链网络均衡[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(8): 54-66.
[8]	李琰, 林欣怡, 达庆利. 基于再制造的多周期闭环营销投入及定价策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(8): 67-74.
[9]	刘东霞, 陈红. 存在二手市场时耐用品垄断厂商再制造策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(6): 104-114.
[10]	张学龙, 吴豆豆, 王军进, 刘家国, 张一纯. 考虑退货风险的制造商双渠道供应链定价决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(3): 59-70.
[11]	黄帝, 周泓. 考虑不同回收质量等级的再制造系统回收生产决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(10): 102-112.
[12]	冯章伟, 肖条军, 柴彩春. 第三方回收商领导型两级闭环供应链的回收与定价策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(1): 118-127.
[13]	朱晓东, 吴冰冰, 王哲. 双渠道回收成本差异下的闭环供应链定价策略与协调机制[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(12): 188-196.
[14]	高鹏, 杜建国, 聂佳佳, 陆玉梅. 消费者后悔预期对竞争型再制造供应链权力结构的影响[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(1): 78-87.
[15]	孙浩, 叶俊, 胡劲松, 达庆利, 王凯. 不同决策模式下制造商与再制造商的博弈策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(1): 160-169.