贸易增长、国际生产分割与CO2排放核算:产业vs.产品

中国管理科学 ›› 2014, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (12): 11-17.

贸易增长、国际生产分割与CO₂排放核算:产业vs.产品

赵忠秀¹, 裴建锁¹, 闫云凤²

1. 对外经济贸易大学国际经济贸易学院, 北京 100029;
2. 首都经济贸易大学经济学院, 北京 100070

收稿日期:2013-03-23 修回日期:2013-07-09 出版日期:2014-12-20 发布日期:2014-12-23
作者简介:赵忠秀(1966-),男(汉族),江苏人,对外经济贸易大学副校长,教授,研究方向:国际贸易理论与政策.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(41205105,71103066);教育部哲社重大课题攻关项目(11JZD025);对外经济贸易大学优秀青年学者培育计划资助(2013YQ01)

Trade Growth, International Fragmentation, and China's CO₂ Growth 1992-2007: The Product-cause Perspective

ZHAO Zhong-xiu¹, PEI Jian-suo¹, YAN Yun-feng²

1. School of International Trade and Economics, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China;
2. School of Economics, Capital Universty of Economics and Business, Beijing 100070, China

Received:2013-03-23 Revised:2013-07-09 Online:2014-12-20 Published:2014-12-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 国际生产分割影响碳排放核算的准确性。之前研究集中在讨论产业部门的效应,本文从产品"蕴含"(embodied)污染的角度进行分析。依据最新可获得的投入产出表数据,考虑加工贸易,利用改进的结构分解模型(SDA),本文研究了我国温室气体排放的影响因素。结果表明:出口的迅猛增长造成了大量的污染排放(剔除加工贸易的影响);其次,排放强度的大幅度降低有效地缓解了环境压力,但生产技术变化的方向、最终消费的高速增长使得节能减排的压力巨大。从产品"蕴含"污染的角度,建筑业的扩张对CO₂排放影响明显,2002年至2007年间对该产品的消费贡献了28%的CO₂排放增幅。因此,应加强技术进步的减排作用,诸如大力推广绿色建筑等。

关键词: 生产分割, 投入产出表, 结构分解模型, 排放强度, 产业政策

Abstract: When accounting for the growth of carbon dioxide, international fragmentation needs to be taken into account. Different from previous studies, which focus on the industry effect, it is proposed to investigate the issue from the perspective of product-cause, i.e. the changes due to the production of certain final goods (either for domestic consumption or for export). By adapting the latest available input-output (IO) data taking into account the processing trade, and by utilizing modified structural decomposition analysis (SDA) model, this paper studies the causes of China's CO₂ emissions growth so as to provide industrial policy suggestions. It is found that, the substantial reduction of coefficients of emissions helped to release environmental pressure, yet the change of technical coefficients, the rapid growth of final uses and export worsened the situation. To enhance the capacity of reducing the emission intensity, new technology such as the so-called "green building" should be promoted.

Key words: international fragmentation, input-output table, structural decomposition analysis (SDA), coefficients of emissions intensity, industry policy

中图分类号:

赵忠秀, 裴建锁, 闫云凤. 贸易增长、国际生产分割与CO₂排放核算:产业vs.产品[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(12): 11-17.

ZHAO Zhong-xiu, PEI Jian-suo, YAN Yun-feng. Trade Growth, International Fragmentation, and China's CO₂ Growth 1992-2007: The Product-cause Perspective[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2014, 22(12): 11-17.

参考文献

[1] Stern H. Stern review on the economics of climate change [M]. London, UK: Her Majesty's Treasury,2006.

[2] Serrano M, Dietzenbacher E. Responsibility and trade emission balances: An evaluation of approaches [J].Ecological Economics, 2010,69(11): 2224-2232.

[3] Copeland B, Taylor M S. North-South trade and the environment [J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1994,109(3): 755-787.

[4] Peters G, Hertwich E. CO₂ embodied in international trade with implications for global climate policy [J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2008,42(5): 1401-1407.

[5] Lenzen M J, Murray F, Sack F,et al. Shared producer and consumer responsibility-theory and practice [J]. Ecological Economics, 2007,61(1): 27-42.

[6] Lin Boqiang, Sun Chuanwang. Evaluating carbon dioxide emissions in international trade of China [J]. Energy Policy, 2010,38(1): 613-621.

[7] Dietzenbacher E, Los B. Structural decomposition techniques: Sense and sensitivity [J]. Economic Systems Research, 1998,10(4): 307-23.

[8] 沈利生,唐志.对外贸易对我国污染排放的影响——以二氧化硫排放为例[J].管理世界,2008,(6): 21-29.

[9] 夏炎,杨翠红,陈锡康. 基于可比价投入产出表分解我国能源强度影响因素[J].系统工程理论与实践,2009,29(10): 21-27.

[10] 刘轶芳,蒋雪梅,祖垒. 低碳约束下我国贸易结构的合理性研究[J].管理评论,2010,22(6): 106-113.

[11] 张为付,杜运苏.中国对外贸易中隐含碳排放失衡度研究[J].中国工业经济,2011,(4):138-147.

[12] 闫云凤,赵忠秀.中国对外贸易隐含碳测度研究[J].国际贸易问题,2012,(1):131-142.

[13] 吴振信,谢晓晶,王书平.经济增长、产业结构对碳排放的影响分析——基于中国的省际面板数据[J].中国管理科学,2012,20(3):161-166.

[14] Rose A. Input-output structural analysis of energy and the environment [Z]. In Van Den Bergh. Handbook of environmental and resource economics. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar,1999: 1164-1179.

[15] Levinson A. Technology, international trade, and pollution from US manufacturing [J].American Economic Review, 2009,99: 2177-2192.

[16] Rose A, Casler S. Input-output structural decomposition analysis: A critical appraisal[J]. Economic Systems Research, 1996,8(1): 33-62.

[17] Miller R, Blair P. Input-Output analysis: Foundations and extensions [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,2009.

[18] 刘遵义, 陈锡康,杨翠红. 非竞争型投入占用产出模型及其应用——中美贸易顺差透视[J].中国社会科学,2007(5): 91-103.

[19] Feenstra R, Wei Shangjin. Introduction to "China's growing role in world trade" [Z]. NBER Working Paper 14716,2009.

[20] Dietzenbacher E, Pei Jiansuo, Yang Cuihong. Trade, production fragmentation, and China's carbon dioxide emissions [J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2012,64(1): 88-101.

[21] 张友国. 中国贸易含碳量及其影响因素——基于( 进口) 非竞争型投入-产出表的分析[J].经济学(季刊),2010,9(4): 1287-1310.

[22] Peters G, Webber C, Guan Dabo,et al. China's growing CO₂ emissions - A race between lifestyle changes and efficiency gains [J]. Environmental Science and Technology,2007, 41(17): 5939-5944.

[23] De Haan M. A structural decomposition analysis of pollution in the Netherlands [J]. Economic Systems Research, 2001,13(2): 181-96.

[24] Peters G, Weber C, Liu Jingru. Construction of Chinese energy and emissions inventory[R].Working Paper,Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim,2006.

贸易增长、国际生产分割与CO₂排放核算:产业vs.产品

Trade Growth, International Fragmentation, and China's CO₂ Growth 1992-2007: The Product-cause Perspective

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 4

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	董雪璠, 刘怡君, 廉莹. 基于熵控原理的多目标第三产业结构优化模型——以北京市为例[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(9): 53-62.
[2]	李玲, 张俊荣, 汤铃, 余乐安. 我国能源强度变动的影响因素分析——基于SDA分解技术[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(9): 125-132.
[3]	张玲玲, 李军, 佟仁城. 基于ERP的机械制造企业投入产出表结构及分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2007, 15(1): 55-63.
[4]	崔玉泉, 史开泉. 合理产业结构的确定方法及预测[J]. 中国管理科学, 2002, (1): 31-34.