股指期货交易政策、投资者行为与市场质量

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.1621

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文研究了在股指期货市场交易政策逐渐松绑这一背景下，投资者股指期货交易行为和股票市场质量的变化特点，以及投资者行为与市场波动性、流动性的相互关系。通过描述性统计、差异性检验和回归检验等方法发现：股指期货交易政策越宽松，投资者长期交易(套期保值)越多、隔夜交易(投机交易)越少，市场整体层面越活跃；股指期货交易越活跃，股票市场波动性越强，随着政策的放松其对波动性的抑制作用有所增强；流动性与股指期货整体活跃程度之间存在“交易转移效应”，与套期保值活跃程度之间存在“增量效应”。综合上述结果，交易政策对投资者越具有吸引力，股指期货越易于发挥其应有作用和基本功能、改善股票市场质量。

关键词: 股指期货；交易政策；市场质量；投资者交易行为

Abstract: With the gradual relaxation of trading policy in the stock index futures market, this paper studies the changing characteristics of the investors’ trading behavior in the stock index futures market and the quality of the stock market, as well as the relationship among the investors’ behavior and the volatility and liquidity of the spot market. Based on the daily market data of CSI300 stock index futures and CSI500 stock index futures and their underlying indexes from September 7, 2015 to September 6, 2019, the following two parts are studied: First, build indicators to reflect the activity of investors using stock index futures for different types of transactions, and then study the impact of policy changing on trading behavior. Second, establish simultaneous equations to study the relationship among investors’ trading activity, stock market quality and the trading policy in the stock index futures market. Through descriptive statistics, difference test and regression test, it is found that: Firstly, the looser the trading policy, the more active the investor’s long-term trading (hedging), the less active the investor’s overnight trading (speculation), and the more active the stock index futures market on the whole level. Secondly, although the more active the stock index futures trading, the stronger the volatility of the stock market, the restraining effect of stock index futures on volatility has also increased with the gradual easing of trading restriction. Thirdly there is “transaction transfer effect” between the overall trading activity of stock index futures and the liquidity of the stock market. At the same time, there is “incremental effect” between the hedging activity and liquidity. In summary, the more attractive the trading policy is to investors, the easier it is for stock index futures to play its due role and basic function and improve the quality of stock market. In contrast to the pre-existing studies, it focuses on the main-board and the small and medium-sized board markets at the same time, and phasically characterizes the role played by index futures in recent years under the Chinese financial system, providing empirical support for regulators to further develop and open index derivatives.

Key words: stock index futures; trading policy; market quality; investors’ trading behavior

中图分类号:

F830

刘慕涵,熊熊. 股指期货交易政策、投资者行为与市场质量[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(7): 126-139.

LIU Mu-han,XIONG Xiong. Stock Index Futures Trading Policy, Investors’ Behavior and Stock Market Quality[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(7): 126-139.

参考文献

［1］张群, 张卫国, 马勇. 中国金融市场系统复杂性的演化机理与管理研究［J］. 管理科学学报, 2017,20(1):75-86.Zhang Qun, Zhang Weiguo, Ma Yong. Evolution mechanisms and management of systemic complexity in China’s financial markets［J］. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2017,20(1):75-86.
［2］熊熊, 许克维, 沈德华. 投资者情绪与期货市场功能——基于沪深300股指期货的研究［J］. 系统工程理论与实践, 2020,40(9):2252-2268.Xiong Xiong, Xu Kewei, Shen Dehua. Investor sentiment and futures market functions: evidence from CSI300 index futures market［J］. Systems Engineering —Theory & Practice, 2020,40(9):2252-2268.
［3］王爽, 宋军. 异常波动中股指期货和现货市场信息传导机制［J］. 系统工程学报, 2017,32(5):628-637.Wang Shuang, Song Jun. Information transmission between futures and spot markets of the stock index in the abnormal market［J］. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2017,32(5):628-637.
［4］刘成立, 王朝晖. 股指期货在预警股票市场系统性风险中的作用研究［J］. 宏观经济研究, 2017(6):32-43, 167.Liu Chengli, Wang Zhaohui. Research on the role of stock index futures in early warning the systematic risk of stock market［J］. Scientific Management Research, 2017(6):32-43, 167.
［5］ Ahn K, Bi Y, Sohn S. Price discovery among SSE 50 index-based spot, futures, and options markets［J］. Journal of Futures Markets, 2019,39(2):238-259.
［6］武佳薇, 孙玉奎, 杨阳. 富时中国A50股指期货对我国期现货市场的影响——理论分析及实证检验［J］. 证券市场导报, 2019(12):51-59, 74.Wu Jiawei, Sun Yukui, Yang Yang. The impact of FTSE China A50 stock index futures on China’s futures and spot market: theoretical analysis and empirical test［J］. Securities Market Herald, 2019(12):51-59, 74.
［7］丁逸俊, 冯芸. 现货市场异常波动下股指期货交易限制对市场质量的影响分析［J］. 系统工程理论与实践, 2017,37(10):2481-2496.Ding Yijun, Feng Yun. Analyzing the impact of stock index futures’ trading limits on market quality during abnormal fluctuations in the spot market［J］. Systems Engineering —Theory & Practice, 2017,37(10):2481-2496.
［8］付志能, 徐维军, 张卫国, 等. 基于随机占优的股指期货市场有效性分析［J］. 运筹与管理, 2020,29(3):169-176.Fu Zhineng, Xu Weijun, Zhang Weiguo, et al. Market efficiency analysis of stock index futures based on stochastic dominance［J］. Operations Research and Management Science, 2020,29(3):169-176.
［9］杨林, 杨雅如. 股指期货“松绑”政策提高了股票市场定价效率吗?［J］. 管理评论, 2021:1-10.Yang Lin, Yang Yaru. Does the “deregulation” policy of stock index futures improve the pricing efficiency of the stock market?［J］. Management Review, 2021:1-10.
［10］ Han Qian, Liang Jufang. Index futures trading restrictions and spot market quality: evidence from the recent Chinese stock market crash［J］. Journal of Futures Markets, 2017,37(4):411-428.
［11］ Lucia J J, Pardo A. On measuring speculative and hedging activities in futures markets from volume and open interest data［J］. Applied Economics, 2010,42(10/12):1549-1557.
［12］ Ap Gwilym O, Buckle M, Evans P. The volume-maturity relationship for stock index, interest rate and bond futures contracts［R］.European Business Management School, 2002.
［13］董珊珊, 冯芸. 沪深300股指期货市场的投机效应研究［C］//首届中国金融发展学术论坛, 中国天津, 2013.Dong Shanshan, Feng Yun. Research on the speculative effect of CSI300 stock index futures market［C］//The First China Financial Development Academic Forum, Tianjin China, 2013.
［14］ Glen J D. An introduction to the microstructure of emerging markets［J］. Socialence Electronic Publishing, 1994,53(1):394-403.
［15］陈其安, 张慧, 陈抒妤. 股指期货交易加剧了中国股票市场波动性吗?——基于投资者结构的理论和实证研究［J］. 中国管理科学, 2020,28(4):1-13.Chen Qi-an, Zhang Hui, Chen Shuyu. Does stock index futures trading increase the stock market volatility in china? Theoretical and empirical research based on investor structure［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020,28(4):1-13.
［16］ Wang S S, Wei L, Cheng T W. The impact of H-share derivatives on the underlying equity market［J］. Review of quantitative finance and accounting, 2009,32(3):235-267.
［17］曹栋, 张佳. 基于GARCH-M模型的股指期货对股市波动影响的研究［J］. 中国管理科学, 2017,25(1):27-34.Cao Dong, Zhang Jia. The impact of index future on stock market volatility based on the GARCH-M model［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017,25(1):27-34.
［18］ Kuserk G J, Locke P R, Sayers C L. The effects of amendments to rule 80a on liquidity, volatility, and price efficiency in the S&P 500 futures［J］. Journal of Futures Markets, 1992,12(4):383-409.
［19］ Silber W L. The economic role of financial futures in futures markets: their economic role［C］//American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington D. C., 1985.
［20］许红伟, 吴冲锋. 沪深300股指期货推出改善了我国股票市场质量吗——基于联立方程模型的实证研究［J］. 南开管理评论, 2012,15(4):101-110.Xu Hongwei, Wu Chongfeng. Did the introduction of CSI 300 index futures improve the quality of spot stock market: an empirical study based on simultaneous-equations model［J］. Nankai Business Review, 2012,15(4):101-110.
［21］ Chou K R, Wang H K G. Transaction tax and market quality of the stock index futures［J］. Journal of Futures Markets, 2006,26(2):1195-1216.
［22］ Lesmond D A. Liquidity of emerging markets［J］. Journal of Financial Economics, 2005,77:411-452.
［23］ McKenzie M D, Brailsford T J, Faff R W. New insights into the impact of the introduction of futures trading on stock price volatility［J］. Journal of Futures Market, 2001,21(3):237-255.
［24］ Bessembinder H, Seguin P J. Futures-trading activity and stock price volatility［J］. Journal of Finance, 1992,47(5):2015-2034.
［25］ Wang G H K, Yau J. Trading volume, bid-ask spread, and price volatility in futures markets［J］. Journal of Futures Markets, 2000,20:943-970.
［26］ Amihud Y. Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects［J］. Journal of Financial Markets, 2002,5:31-56.

[1]	罗鹏飞, 姚彦铭, 谭英贤. 突发公共卫生事件下企业委托代理问题与最优资本结构[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(10): 47-56.
[2]	叶彦艺, 杨晓光. 股票市场知情交易如何影响信用债利差[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(9): 1-10.
[3]	甘柳, 蔡颖俐, 徐明玉, 谭英贤. 二级债券市场信息获取与可转债融资[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(9): 22-32.
[4]	姚银红, 王晓旭, 陈炜, 陈振松. 基于Transformer-LSTM分位数回归的全球股市极端风险溢出研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(8): 1-13.
[5]	吴伟平, 林雨, 金成能, 唐振鹏. 随机市场深度下基于风险管理和交易约束的最优执行问题[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(8): 14-25.
[6]	颜镜洲, 李仲飞, 毛杰, 李星毅. 模糊波动下的策略交易和市场质量[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(8): 26-36.
[7]	张维, 陈卓, 冯绪, 熊熊, 张永杰. 金融系统工程在中国：2010－2024[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(7): 11-23.
[8]	田军, 董赞强, 李雅丽. 基于预付账款融资模式的供应链融资策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(7): 272-283.
[9]	罗鹏飞, 刘新乐, 陆婷, 张勇. 碳减排下的企业并购决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(7): 337-345.
[10]	杨科, 刘鑫, 田凤平. 中国与其他主要新兴市场国家间股市极端风险的跨市场传染[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(7): 44-53.
[11]	文璐, 冯玲. 动态政府干预下银行风险传染与最优救助决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(6): 37-48.
[12]	欧阳资生, 周学伟. 中国金融机构系统性风险回测与关联研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(6): 14-26.
[13]	赵志明, 潘琼. 债权激励对公司再融资的影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(6): 27-36.
[14]	谭春萍, 秦学志, 尚勤, 王文华, 林先伟. 企业财务困境的激励相容式组合纾解策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(5): 13-25.
[15]	于辉, 王霜. 供应链金融：企业如何实现“鱼与熊掌”兼得？[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(5): 280-289.