基于能源替代与环境污染治理的两阶段经济增长路径研究

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.09.015

中国管理科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (9): 146-153.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.09.015

基于能源替代与环境污染治理的两阶段经济增长路径研究

仓定帮¹, 魏晓平², 曹明³, 谭立云¹

1. 华北科技学院理学院, 河北三河 065201;
2. 中国矿业大学管理学院, 江苏徐州 221116;
3. 中国矿业大学公共管理学院, 江苏徐州 221116

收稿日期:2018-05-11 修回日期:2019-02-02 出版日期:2020-09-20 发布日期:2020-09-25
通讯作者: 魏晓平(1953-),女(汉族),黑龙江鹤岗人,中国矿业大学管理学院,教授,博士生导师,研究方向:资源优化配置及数量经济学,E-mail:Wei.xp@163.com E-mail:Wei.xp@163.com
基金资助:
国家社科基金一般资助项目（15BGL175）；煤炭工业协会指导类项目（MX2017HK021）；华北科技学院教育教学改革专项（05020102090213-1059）

Study on Two-phase Economic Growth Path Based on Pollution Control and Energy Substitution

CANG Ding-bang¹, WEI Xiao-ping², CAO Ming³, TAN Li-yun¹

1. North China Institute of Science and Technology, Sanhe 065201, China;
2. School of Management, China University of Mine and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China;
3. School of Public Policy&Management, China University of Mine and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China

Received:2018-05-11 Revised:2019-02-02 Online:2020-09-20 Published:2020-09-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研究了一个包含污染治理和能源替代的两阶段经济增长模型，首先利用动态最优化方法，基于社会福利最大化目标给出了分别由传统能源支撑和新能源支撑经济系统的经济增长速度、污染变化速度以及最优的污染治理投资占总产出的比例。然后借助两阶段最优化理论，得到了最优替代节点所满足的方程，发现经济结构、技术水平等因素都会对最优替代节点产生影响。最后通过数值模拟给出了经济最优增长路径以及相关参数对最优替代节点的影响程度。结果显示，最优的能源替代节点处经济增长不连续，新能源支撑的经济发展速度要高于传统能源支持的经济增长速度；如果传统能源支撑的经济系统污染的产出弹性较大，则在能源替代发生以后可能需要更多的时间治理已经产生的污染；另外提高污染治理效率会延缓能源替代，而提高技术对污染的控制效率可以促进能源替代进程。

关键词: 经济增长, 传统能源, 新能源, 污染治理, 能源替代

Abstract: The coordinated development of energy consumption, economic growth and environment is an important aspect of sustainable development. How to achieve sustainable economic growth under the double constraints of energy and environment has always been a hot spot in energy economics research. Since the consumption of fossil energy will bring serious environmental externalities and intergenerational externalities, new energy sources have developed rapidly in recent years, and the role of promoting economic growth has become more and more obvious. China's energy transformation has begun, the share of new energy consumption in the energy consumption structure has increased rapidly, and the energy substitution effect is remarkable. To better understand the impact of the energy transition on economic growth,a two-phase economic growth model including the adoption of a backstop substitute and pollution control is studied. Then the optimal proportion of pollution investment accounted for GDP and the equation which optimal switching time satisfies is determined by social welfare maximization. At last the numerical simulation analysis is done to show the effect of some parameters on the optimal switching time and the optimal path of economic growth and the pollution are also given.The results show that at the optimal switching time of the two stage of economic growth path, the total amount of new energy support will decrease temporarily, but the economic growth rate of new energy supported is higher than that of traditional energy support.If the output elasticity of pollution in the traditional energy supported economy is larger, after the energy substitution occurs,longer time will be needed to control the pollution that has been produced.

Key words: economic growth, pollution control, traditional resources, new resources, energy substitute

中图分类号:

F407

仓定帮, 魏晓平, 曹明, 谭立云. 基于能源替代与环境污染治理的两阶段经济增长路径研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(9): 146-153.

CANG Ding-bang, WEI Xiao-ping, CAO Ming, TAN Li-yun. Study on Two-phase Economic Growth Path Based on Pollution Control and Energy Substitution[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(9): 146-153.

参考文献

[1] Hotelling H. The economics of exhaustible resources[J].Journal of Political Economy,1931, 39(2):137-175.
[2] Dasgupta P,Heal G.The optimal depletion of exhaustible resources[J].Review of Economic Studies,1974,41(128):3-28.
[3] Solow R M.Integrenerational equity and exhaustible resources[J].Review of Economic Studies,1974,41(128):29-45.
[4] Stiglitz J E.Growth with exhaustible natural resources:efficient and optimal growth paths[J].Review of Economics Studies,1974, 41(5):123-137.
[5] Benchekroun H, Withagen C.The optimal depletion of exhaustible resources:A complete characterization[J]. Resource and Energy Economics,2011,33(3):612-636.
[6] Lucas R.On the mechanics of economic development[J].Journal of Monetary Economics,1988, 22(1):3-42.
[7] Lucas R E.On the mechanics of economics development[J].Journlao of Monetary Economics,1998,22:3-42.
[8] Romer P.Endogenous technological change[J].Journal of Political Economy,1990,98(5):71-102.
[9] Bovenberg A S, Smulders S.Environment quality and pollution augmenting technological change in a two-sector endogenous growth model[J].Journal of Public Economics,1995,57(3):369-391.
[10] Grossman G M, Helpman E.Innovation and growth in the global economy[M].Cambridge:Mit Press, 1991.
[11] Chichilnisky G. Global environment and north south trade[J].American Economic Review,1994,84(4):851-874.
[12] Bovenberg A L,Smulders S A.Transitional impacts of environmental policy in an endoge nousgrowth model[J].International Economic Review,1996,37(5):861-893.
[13] Eliasson L, Turnovsky S J.Renewable resources in an endogenously growing economy:Balanced growth and transitional dynamics[J].Journal of Economic Growth,2003,115(6):213-241.
[14] Schou P.Polluting non-renewable resources and growth[J].Environmental and Resource Economics,2000,16(2):211-227.
[15] 王海建.资源约束、环境污染与内生经济增长[J].复旦学报:社会科学版,2000,(1):76-80.
[16] 彭水军,包群. 环境污染、内生增长与经济可持续发展[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2006,(9):114-126.
[17] 于渤,黎永亮,迟春浩.考虑能源耗竭、污染治理的经济持续增长内生模型[J].管理科学学报,2006,8:12-17.
[18] 张彬,左晖.能源持续利用、环境治理和内生经济增长[J].中国人口资源与环境,2007,17(5):27-32.
[19] 许士春,何正霞,魏晓平.资源消耗、污染控制下经济可持续最优增长路径[J].管理科学学报,2010,13(1):20-30.
[20] 郭正权,张兴平,郑宇花.能源价格波动对能源-环境-经济系统的影响研究[J].中国管理科学,2018,26(11):22-30.
[21] 潘伟,熊建武.电力消耗、经济增长与CO2排放量的实证分析-基于中国面板数据[J].中国管理科学,2018,26(3):152-159.
[22] 崔百胜,朱麟.基于内生增长理论与GVAR模型的能源消费控制目标下经济增长与碳排放研究[J].中国管理科学,2016,24(1):11-20.
[23] Nordhaus W D, Solow R. The allocation of energy resources[J]. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity,1973,4(3):529-576.
[24] Tahvonen O.Fossil fuels, stock externalities and backstop technology[J].Canadian Journal of Economics,1997,30(4):855-874.
[25] Valente S.Endogenous growth, backstop technology adoption and optimal jumps[J].Macroeconomic Dynamics,2009,15(3):293-325.
[26] Vita G D, Renewable resource and waste recycling[J].Environ Modeling Assessment,2004, 9(3):159-167.
[27] Vita G D.Natural resources dynamics:Exhaustible and renewable resources,and the rate of technical substitution[J].Resources Policy,2006,31(3):172-182.
[28] Valente S.Sustainable development,renewable resources and technological progress[J].Environmental and Resource Economics,2005, 30(1):115-125.
[29] Bastianoni S,Pulselli R M,Pulselli F M.Models of withdrawing renewable and non-renewable resources based on Odum's energy systems theory and Daly's quasi-sustain ability principle[J].Ecological Modeling, 2009, 220(16):126-130.
[30] Nguyen M H,Nguyen-Van P.Growth and convergence in a model with renewable and nonrenewable resources[R].Working Paper,2008.
[31] Malt soglou I.Simulating exogenous and endogenous technology when depletables, renewables and pollution coexist:How to achieve sustainability[J].Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,2008,58(6):80-98.
[32] 后勇,徐福缘,程纬.基于可再生能源替代的经济持续发展模型[J].系统工程理论与实践,2008,28(9):67-72.
[33] Tomiyama K.Two-stage optimal control problems and optimality conditions[J]. Jowrnal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 1985,9(3), 317-337.

基于能源替代与环境污染治理的两阶段经济增长路径研究

Study on Two-phase Economic Growth Path Based on Pollution Control and Energy Substitution

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	熊勇清, 李小龙, 黄恬恬. 基于不同补贴主体的新能源汽车制造商定价决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(8): 139-147.
[2]	徐晓亮, 许学芬. 能源补贴改革对资源效率和环境污染治理影响研究——基于动态CGE模型的分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(5): 221-230.
[3]	张雪峰, 宋鸽, 闫勇. 城市低碳交通体系对能源消费结构的影响研究——来自中国十四个城市的面板数据经验[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(12): 173-183.
[4]	王升泉, 陈浪南, 刘人豪. 资产泡沫、技术创新与经济增长[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(10): 1-12.
[5]	赵骅, 郑吉川. 不同新能源汽车补贴政策对市场稳定性的影响[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(9): 47-55.
[6]	刘晓君, 姜伟, 胡劲松. 基于TVP-VAR模型的信心、货币政策与中国经济波动研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(8): 37-46.
[7]	纪建悦, 张懿, 任文菡. 环境规制强度与经济增长——基于生产性资本和健康人力资本视角[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(8): 57-65.
[8]	安超, 雷明. 二氧化碳排放、人力资本和内生经济增长研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(5): 149-160.
[9]	经有国, 郭培强, 秦开大. 需求率受推广努力水平影响的新能源汽车租赁系统协调契约[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(3): 94-100.
[10]	潘伟, 熊建武. 电力消耗、经济增长与CO₂排放量的实证分析——基于中国面板数据[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(3): 152-159.
[11]	黄毅祥, 蒲勇健. 新能源汽车分时租赁市场竞争的进化博弈模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(2): 79-85.
[12]	李爱华, 宿洁, 贾传亮. 经济增长与碳排放协调发展及一致性模型研究——宏观低碳经济的数理分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(4): 1-6.
[13]	曲卫华, 颜志军. 环境污染、经济增长与医疗卫生服务对公共健康的影响分析——基于中国省际面板数据的研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(7): 166-176.
[14]	李苗苗, 肖洪钧, 赵爽. 金融发展、技术创新与经济增长的关系研究——基于中国的省市面板数据[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(2): 162-169.
[15]	赵新刚, 刘平阔. 经济增长与能源强度：基于面板平滑转换回归模型的实证分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(6): 103-113.