消费者异质偏好结构下动态创新竞合系统定价与创新策略研究

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.0005

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于消费者对产品创新属性和价格属性的异质偏好结构，针对潜在创新企业和非创新企业间的动态竞合关系，构建了潜在创新企业和非创新企业间的集中式决策模型和Nash分散式决策模型，进而分析消费者异质偏好结构对潜在创新企业和非创新企业决策的影响机理。研究表明：(1)相较于分散式决策系统，集中式决策系统是把双刃剑。集中式决策系统虽然提升了非创新企业和潜在创新企业的产品定价、系统整体利润，抑制了非创新企业发展，压缩了落后产能；但是，集中式决策亦抑制了潜在创新企业的产品创新活动，降低了创新产品产能，不利于社会的创新研发。(2)随着消费者对产品创新属性偏好的增加，潜在创新企业产品定价和供货量上升，非创新企业产品定价和供货量下降；系统利润先下降后上升，非创新企业利润一致单调下降，潜在创新企业利润一致单调上升。(3)随着产品创新难度的增加，潜在创新企业以及非创新企业的产品定价、系统盈利水平均下降。此外还发现，产品相对创新度对系统主体决策存在复杂影响。

关键词: 创新竞合系统, 定价、供货机制, 创新策略, 消费者异质偏好

Abstract: Business innovation is an important source for social development. However, it is a slow evolutionary process for enterprises to convert from conservative production to innovative development. During the process competition and cooperation between potential innovative companies and conservative non-innovative companies will arise. To be specific, competition is caused by market competition between companies, while cooperation, in most case, results from joint decisions between companies to control prices and output. In the competition-cooperation game between potential innovative companies and non-innovative companies, consumers have subjective understanding and judgment on pricing and innovation levels of products from different companies, therefore, the market demand for products is influenced by consumers' heterogeneous preference. If so, how will the consumers’ heterogeneous preference structure affect the product pricing, supply and innovation decisions of enterprise in the innovative competition-cooperation system?

Key words: innovative competition-cooperation system, pricing-supply mechanism, innovation strategy, consumers’ heterogeneous preference

中图分类号:

F272.3
C934

曲薪池, 侯贵生, 孙向彦. 消费者异质偏好结构下动态创新竞合系统定价与创新策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(1): 88-99.

QU Xin-chi, HOU Gui-sheng, SUN Xiang-yan. Pricing and Innovation Strategies of Dynamic Innovative Competition-Cooperation System under the Framework of Consumers’ Heterogeneous Preference[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(1): 88-99.

参考文献

［1］ Kamakura W A, Kim B, Lee J J. Modeling preference and structural heterogeneity in consumer choice［J］. Marketing Science,1996, 15(2):152-172.
［2］卢洪友, 邓谭琴, 余锦亮. 财政补贴能促进企业的“绿化”吗?——基于中国重污染上市公司的研究［J］. 经济管理,2019,41(4):5-22.Lu Hongyou, Deng Tanqin, Yu Jinliang. Can financial subsidies promote the “Greening” of enterprises? Research on listed companies from heavy pollution industry in China［J］. Business Management Journal,2019,41(4):5-22.
［3］盛永祥, 胡俊, 吴洁,等. 技术因素影响产学研合作创新意愿的演化博弈研究［J］.管理工程学报,2020,34(2):172-179.Sheng Yongxiang, Hu Jun, Wu Jie, et al. Study on the evolutionary game of the effect of technology on the innovation willingness of production and research cooperation［J］.Journal of Industrial Engineering/Engineering Management,2020,34(2):172-179.
［4］贾瑞乾, 陈松, 李炼. 专利组合对上海制造业上市公司企业价值的影响［J］. 科研管理, 2019,40(8):198-205.Jia Ruiqian, Chen Song, Li Lian. Impact of patent portfolio on corporate value of Shanghai listed manufacturing companies［J］. Science Research Management,2019,40(8):198-205.
［5］ Keane M, Wasi N. How to model consumer heterogeneity? Lessons from three case studies on SP and RP data［J］. Research in Economics,2016,70(2):197-231.
［6］白让让. 轿车细分市场中产品线定位的影响因素分析［J］. 管理科学,2010,23(1):2-9.Bai Rangrang. The analysis on influence factor of the automobile product line segment market positing［J］. Journal of Management,2010,23(1): 2-9.
［7］赵伟光, 李凯. 考虑消费者异质偏好的产品线定价策略识别及其效应分析［J］. 管理学报, 2019,16(12):1854-1863.Zhao Weiguang, Li Kai. Consumers’ heterogeneous, product line pricing strategy identification and its effect［J］. Chinese Journal of Management,2019,16(12):1854-1863.
［8］ Desarbo W S, Ansari A, Chintagunta P K, et al. Representing Heterogeneity in Consumer Response Models 1996 Choice Conference Participants［J］. Marketing Letters,1997,8(3): 335-348.
［9］林雅琴, 郭强, 张志文,等. 淡季中酒店与OTA合作模式选择研究［J］. 中国管理科学,2018, 26(5):187-196.Lin Yaqin, Guo Qiang, Zhang Zhiwen, et al. Study on cooperation model decisions for hotels and OTAs in the off-season［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science,2018,26(5): 187-196.
［10］王春苹, 南国芳, 李敏强,等. 寡头市场信息产品与服务的最优定价策略［J］. 管理科学学报,2016,19(3):92-106.Wang Chunping, Nan Guofang, Li Minqiang, et al. Optimal pricing for information goods and complementary services in duopoly markets［J］. Journal of Management Sciences in China,2016, 19(3):92-106.
［11］刘征驰, 马滔, 申继禄. 个性定制、价值感知与知识付费定价策略［J］. 管理学报,2018, 15(12):1846-1853.Liu Zhengchi, Ma Tao, Shen Jilu. Personality customization, value perception, and knowledge payment pricing strategy［J］. Chinese Journal of Management,2018, 15(12):1846-1853.
［12］雷西洋, 丁彦, 李姚矿,等. 一种考虑子公司竞合关系的跨国公司固定成本分摊方法［J］.系统工程理论与实践,2019,39(7):1714-1720.Lei Xiyang, Ding Yan, Li Yaokuang, et al. A study on multinational corporations’ fixed cost allocation method with considering subsidiaries’ competition and cooperation relationship［J］. Systems Engineering - Theory & Practice,2019,39(7):1714-1720.
［13］ Chen M J, Miller D. Reconceptualizing competitive dynamics: A multidimensional framework［J］. Strategic Management Journal，2015,36(5):758-775.
［14］ Menon A R, Yao D A. Elevating repositioning costs: Strategy dynamics and competitive interactions［J］. Strategic Management Journal, 2017,38:1953-1963.
［15］肖旦, 周永务, 范丽繁,等. 改良技术共享下改良品联合采购联盟的竞合博弈研究［J］. 中国管理科学,2019,27(2):129-137.Xiao Dan, Zhou Yongwu, Fan Lifan, et al. Co-opetition game analysis of joint purchasing coalitions of ameliorating items with ameliorating technology sharing［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science,2019,27(2): 129-137.
［16］ Crawford S S, Gray W R, Kern A E. Why do fund managers identify and share profitable Ideas［J］. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,2017,52(5):1903-1926.
［17］ Baumg R. Heinrich on stackelberd on joint production［J］. The European journal of the history of economic thought,2001,8(4):509- 525.
［18］ Han Xiaohua, Wu Haiyan, Yang Qianxia, et al. Collection channel and production decisions in a closed-loop supply chain with remanufacturing cost disruption［J］. International Journal of Production Research,2017,55(4):1147-1167.
［19］李友东, 夏良杰, 王锋正,等. 考虑渠道权力结构的低碳供应链减排策略比较研究［J］. 管理评论,2019,31(11):240-254.Li Youdong, Xia Liangjie, Wang Fengzheng, et al. A comparative study reduction policies of low-carbon supply chain considering channel power structure［J］. Management Review,2019,31(11):240-254.
［20］ Han Xiaohua, Wu Haiyan, Yang Qianxia, et al. Reverse channel selection under remanufacturing risks: Balancing profitability and robustness［J］. International Journal of Production Economics, 2016(182):63-72.
［21］ Qi X T, Bard J F, Yu G. Supply chain coordination with demand disruptions［J］. Omega,2004,32(4):301-312.
［22］ Xu Guangye, Dan Bin, Zhang Xumei, et al. Coordinating a dual-channel supply chain with risk-averse under a two-way revenue sharing contract［J］. International Journal of Production Economics，2014,147:171-179.
［23］张伸, 孟庆春, 安国政. 电商平台扣点率影响下的双渠道供应链协调定价研究［J］. 中国管理科学,2019,27(10):44-55.Zhang Shen, Meng Qingchun, An Guozheng. Coordinated pricing in the dual channel supply chain with the commission rate of the e-commerce platform［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science,2019,27(10):44-55.
［24］刘新民, 赵梁, 王垒,等. 考虑随机市场需求的双渠道供应链风险补偿策略研究——从质量与价格竞争视角［J］. 中国管理科学,2019, 27(1):73-84.Liu Xinmin, Zhao Liang, Wang Lei, et al. Research on risk-reward strategy of dual channel supply chain with stochastic market demand: from the perspective of quality and price competition［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science,2019, 27(1):73-84.
［25］李友东, 夏良杰, 王锋正. 基于产品替代的低碳供应链博弈与协调模型［J］. 中国管理科学,2019,27(10):66-76.Li Youdong, Xia Liangjie, Wang Fengzheng. Game and coordination model for low-carbon supply chain with product substitution［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science,2019,27(10):66-76.

[1]	张华, 李莉, 朱星圳, 何向. 网络购物平台最优价格促销策略：价格折扣还是现金券？[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(10): 130-141.
[2]	舒斯亮, 柳键. 不同权力结构下供应链概率销售策略比较研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(9): 152-161.
[3]	丁龙, 胡斌, 常珊. 制造商RFID策略与零售商窜货策略的动态博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(8): 82-94.
[4]	程粟粟, 张帆, 李冬冬. 基于绿色技术研发的绿色供应链微分博弈及协调模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(8): 95-105.
[5]	胡玉生, 李金林, 张文思, 赵天. 可加效用下基于消费者惰性的易逝品动态定价[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(6): 99-105.
[6]	王宇, 翟佳, 邓杰. 股权融资下企业市场竞争策略选择的模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(5): 98-108.
[7]	王璐, 马庆庆, 杨劼, 郑君君. 基于复杂网络演化博弈的绿色消费者对新能源汽车扩散的影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(4): 74-85.
[8]	林莉, 王玉, 吴嘉聪. 消费者视角下中小企业社群动态定制仿真建模及其管理策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(3): 13-29.
[9]	余顺坤, 闫泓序, 杜思悦, 林依青. 基于SC-RS的我国工业电力用户价值画像模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(3): 106-116.
[10]	卢超, 王倩倩, 赵梦园, 闫俊琳. “双积分”政策下汽车制造商竞争定价与减排策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(1): 64-76.
[11]	曹裕, 易超群, 万光羽. 碳税政策下随机双渠道库存与协调研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(1): 111-123.
[12]	牛攀峰，侯文华. 考虑供应商产品交付水平的供应链融资策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(10): 70-83.
[13]	闫泓序，余顺坤，林依青. 我国工业电力用户价值画像模型构建与应用研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(10): 224-235.
[14]	谈丹, 魏航, 李佩. 制造商技术开放策略问题研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(7): 84-95.
[15]	樊相宇, 胡博雅, 武小平. 考虑无缺陷退货下零售商转运的供应链回购契约研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(7): 139-147.