基于努力和赔偿成本分摊机制的云服务供应链协调

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.05.011

中国管理科学 ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (5): 82-88.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.05.011

基于努力和赔偿成本分摊机制的云服务供应链协调

梁昌勇¹, 叶春森^1,2

1. 合肥工业大学管理学院, 安徽合肥 230009;
2. 安徽大学商学院, 安徽合肥 230601

收稿日期:2013-06-24 修回日期:2014-03-27 出版日期:2015-05-20 发布日期:2015-05-20
作者简介:梁昌勇(1965-),男(汉族),安徽肥西人,合肥工业大学管理学院教授,博士生导师,研究方向:管理信息系统、智能决策方法、行为决策等.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重点项目(71331002);教育部人文社科项目(12YJC630268)

Research on Coordinating Cloud Service Supply Chain Based on the Apportioning Mechanism of the Cost of Effort and Compensation

LIANG Chang-yong¹, YE Chun-sen^1,2

1. School of Management Hefei University of Technology, Anhui 230009, China;
2. School of Business Administration, Anhui University, Anhui 230601, China

Received:2013-06-24 Revised:2014-03-27 Online:2015-05-20 Published:2015-05-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 云服务的技术研发努力和使用失败赔偿促销是提高云服务采纳率的重要措施。根据努力水平在云服务供应链整合中的作用,提出努力水平对需求、价格之间的不同影响机理,研究基于技术努力成本和赔偿成本分摊机制实现云服务供应链的协调问题。研究结果表明赔偿促销与技术研发努力的分配机制能提高供应链的整体利润;随努力水平作用于价格、需求的机理不同,努力成本分摊和赔偿成本分摊机制的协调范围、条件和能力也不同,其结果为均衡技术研发努力和使用失败赔偿促销两种措施提供决策支撑。最后通过算例展示模型的有效性。

关键词: SaaS-PaaS, 努力成本, 赔偿机制, 供应链协调

Abstract: Efforts in cloud service technology research and development and compensation from failure applications are two key count-measures in order to improve the rate of adoption of cloud service in client market. The interactive mechanism between effort, demand and price is proposed according to the role of theirs in integrating cloud service supply chain in this paper, and the coordination of cloud service supply chain is studied based on cost distributions of efforts cost and compensation cost. The research shows that coordination and equilibriums can improve the profits of the whole supply chain and realize Pareto improvement, and different interactive mechanisms have different coordination scopes and conditions based on apportioning parameters of the costs, which can provide some advice for equilibriums making decision of efforts level and compensation promotion. Finally, numerical examples and experiments are applied to illustrate the validity of the proposed method.

Key words: SaaS-PaaS, effort cost, compensation mechanism, supply chain coordination

中图分类号:

F272

梁昌勇, 叶春森. 基于努力和赔偿成本分摊机制的云服务供应链协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(5): 82-88.

LIANG Chang-yong, YE Chun-sen. Research on Coordinating Cloud Service Supply Chain Based on the Apportioning Mechanism of the Cost of Effort and Compensation[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015, 23(5): 82-88.

参考文献

[1] Jula A, Sundararajan E,Othman Z. Cloud computing service composition: A systematic literature review[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2014, 41(8): 3809-3824.

[2] Dha S. From outsourcing to cloud computing: Evolution of IT services[J]. Management Research Review, 2012, 35(8): 664-675.

[3] 冯芷艳,郭迅华,曾大军,等.大数据背景下商务管理研究若干前言课题[J].管理科学学报,2013,16(1):1-9.

[4] Gonçalves V, Ballon P. Adding value to the network: Mobile operators' experiments with software-as-a-service and platform-as-a-service models[J]. Telemetric and Informatics, 2011, 28(1):12-21.

[5] Lee S G,Chae S G. Drivers and inhibitors of SaaS adoption in Korea[J]. International Journal of Information Management, 2013, 33(3): 429-440.

[6] Demirkan H, Delen D. Leveraging the capabilities of service-oriented decision support systems: Putting analytics and big data in cloud[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2013, 55(1): 412-421.

[7] Fan Ming, Kumar S, Andrew B. Short-term and long-term competition between providers of shrink-wrap software and software as a service[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009,196 (2):661-671.

[8] Benlian A, Marios K. Service quality in software-as-a-Service: Developing the SaaS quality measure and examining its role in usage continuance[J].Journal of Management Information Systems, 2011, 28(3): 85-126.

[9] Dorsch C, Häcke B. Combining models of capacity supply to handle volatile demand: The economic impact of surplus capacity in cloud service environments[J].Decision Support Systems, 2014, 58:3-14.

[10] Demirkan H, Cheng H K. The risk and information sharing of application service supply chain[J].European Journal of Operation Research, 2008, 187(2):756-784.

[11] Demirkan H, Cheng H K, Bandy S. Coordination strategies in a SaaS supply chain[J].Journal of Management Information Systems, 2010, 26(4):119-143.

[12] 郑惠莉,达庆利.移动互联网供应链协调机制研究[J].管理科学学报, 2005, 8(5):31-37.

[13] 但斌,宋寒,张旭梅.服务外包中双边道德风险的关系契约机理机制[J].系统工程理论与实践, 2010, 30(11):1944-1953.

[14] 任怀飞,张旭梅.ASP模式下关键业务应用服务外包中的激励契约研究[J].科研管理,2012,33(11):68-75.

[15] 李新明,廖貅武,刘洋.基于SaaS模式的服务供应链协调研究[J].中国管理科学, 2013, 21(2):98-106.

[16] Tsao Y, Sheen G. Effects of promotion cost sharing policy with the sales learning curve on supply chain coordination[J]. Computers & Operations Research,2012, 39(8):1872-1878.

[17] Taylor T A. Supply chain coordination under channel rebates with sales effort effects[J].management science, 2002, 48(8):992-1007.

[18] Ali S, Schneider S. Viewpoint cloud services certification[J]. Communications of the COM, 2013, 56(2):33-37.

基于努力和赔偿成本分摊机制的云服务供应链协调

Research on Coordinating Cloud Service Supply Chain Based on the Apportioning Mechanism of the Cost of Effort and Compensation

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	曹晓宁, 王永明, 薛方红, 刘晓冰. 供应商保鲜努力的生鲜农产品双渠道供应链协调决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(3): 109-118.
[2]	叶同, 关志民, 张大儒, 曲优. Nash讨价还价公平关切下基于低碳商誉的供应链联合减排与广告的动态优化与协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(3): 119-132.
[3]	刘墨林, 但斌, 马崧萱. 考虑保鲜努力与增值服务的生鲜电商供应链最优决策与协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(8): 76-88.
[4]	刘阳, 田军, 冯耕中, 扈衷权. 基于期权契约的政企联合储备应急物资模型与利润分配机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(8): 162-171.
[5]	张旭梅, 王大飞, 任廷海, 官子力, 但斌. 考虑消费者策略行为的供应链两周期定价与契约设计[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(7): 132-145.
[6]	张玉华, 戴更新, 孙浩, 韩广华, 王磊. 基于信任的供应预测信息共享策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(5): 112-121.
[7]	张云丰, 王勇, 龚本刚, 但斌. 需求受销售价格与变质时间影响的时滞变质品供应链协调研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(3): 142-151.
[8]	扈衷权, 田军, 冯耕中. 基于看跌期权契约的应急物资采购储备模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(2): 69-79.
[9]	代建生. 零售商的资金约束对协调契约的影响分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(10): 98-108.
[10]	王芹鹏. 考虑参考减排努力水平效应的联合减排与竞争动态策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(10): 172-182.
[11]	林晶, 王健, 郑敏. 买方抗衡势力下双渠道促销合作微分博弈研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(9): 80-92.
[12]	王绪金, 马骋. 多层供应链外包模式的选择及其协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(8): 151-161.
[13]	王永龙, 付恒, 方新, 蹇明. 突发性产出下的供应链协调应对策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(7): 137-146.
[14]	杜文意, 刘晓婧, 唐小我. 基于融资需求的损失厌恶零售商订货策略及供应链协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(3): 96-104.
[15]	何彦东, 王旭, 周福礼, 周林. 基于双边努力因素的网购供应链协调研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(2): 83-92.