Chinese Journal of Management Science >
2024 , Vol. 32 >Issue 1: 220 - 230
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.1860
Supply Chain Information Disclosure Strategy Considering Uncertain Demands Under the Development Pattern of Dual Circulation
Received date: 2021-09-13
Revised date: 2022-01-13
Online published: 2024-02-08
Under the new development pattern of dual circulation and facing the uncertainty of the market, it’s worth discussing whether local manufacturers with comprehensive data have the motivation to disclose information and whether more accurate demand signals are beneficial to all parties in the supply chain. A stylized signal game model under the competitive environment is constructed to study the information disclosure problem in the supply chain system. In the two modes of information encryption and information disclosure, factors affecting the strategy choices of the supply chain members such as product brand image, market demand uncertainty, and investment efficiency are considered to deduce the conditional interval for achieving the Pareto optimality of the supply chain. The results show that encrypting company information to maintain the information security of the supply chain may not be the best choice for local manufacturers. When the investment cost is higher than a certain threshold, local manufacturers will voluntarily abandon the information encryption strategy and turn to the disclosure strategy, while the multinational manufacturers always favor the information disclosure strategy. Meanwhile, there is a win-win interval for domestic and foreign supply chain members, which are specifically divided into “win-win under a high-quality image” and “win-win under a poor-quality image”. Interestingly, the size of the win-win interval is affected by the market demand uncertainty, noise deviations that interfere with market forecasts, and foreign wholesale prices. Therefore, companies should pay close attention to market fluctuations and their own brand image before making strategic choices.
Jiaguo Liu , Huimin Zhang , Mingming Yang . Supply Chain Information Disclosure Strategy Considering Uncertain Demands Under the Development Pattern of Dual Circulation[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024 , 32(1) : 220 -230 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.1860
| 1 | 刘家国,许浩楠.双循环视角下我国全球供应链韧性体系建设研究[J].中国软科学, 2023, 393(9): 1-12. |
| 1 | Liu J G, Xu H N. Construction of China’s global supply chain resilience from the perspective of Dual-Circulation[J].China Soft Science, 2023, 393(9): 1-12. |
| 2 | Wu L, Chuang C H, Hsu C H. Information sharing and collaborative behaviors in enabling supply chain performance: a social exchange perspective[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2014, 148(2): 122-132. |
| 3 | Zhang C, Li S H. Secure information sharing in internet-based supply chain management systems[J].Journal of Computer Information Systems, 2006, 46(4): 18-24. |
| 4 | Li L. Information sharing in a supply chain with horizontal competition[J]. Management science, 2002, 48(9): 1196-1212. |
| 5 | Zhang S G, Dan B, Zhou M S. After-sale service deployment and information sharing in a supply chain under demand uncertainty[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2019, 279(2): 351-363. |
| 6 | 邓力, 赵瑞娟, 郑建国, 等. 双渠道供应链质量信息披露策略[J]. 系统管理学报, 2019, 28(1): 141-164. |
| 6 | Deng L, Zhao R J, Zheng J G, et al. Quality disclosure strategy in Dual-channel supply chain[J]. Journal of Systems Management, 2019, 28(1): 141-164. |
| 7 | Choi T M, Feng L P, Li R. Information disclosure structure in supply chains with rental service platforms in the blockchain technology era[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2020, 221: 107473. |
| 8 | 经有国, 刘震, 李胜男. 不确定需求下制造商渠道入侵与信息收集披露激励[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2020, 25(2): 109-117. |
| 8 | Jing Y G, Liu Z, Li S N. Manufacturer channel encroachment and incentive retailer to collect and disclosure information under uncertain demand[J]. Industrial Engineering and Management, 2020, 25(2): 109-117. |
| 9 | 张玉华, 戴更新, 孙浩, 等. 基于信任的供应预测信息共享策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020(5): 112-121. |
| 9 | Zhang Y H, Dai G X, Sun H, et al. The strategy of Trust-based supply forecast information sharing[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020(5): 112-121. |
| 10 | Niu B Z, Xie F F, Mu Z H, et al. Multinational firms’ local sourcing strategies considering unreliable supply and environmental sustainability[J].Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2020, 155: 104648. |
| 11 | Li W, Chen J. Pricing and quality competition in a brand-differentiated supply chain[J].International Journal of Production Economics, 2018, 202: 97-108. |
| 12 | Singh N, Vives X. Price and quantity competition in a differentiated duopoly[J]. The Rand Journal of Economics, 1984,15(4): 546-554. |
| 13 | Xu J Y, Hsu V N, Niu B Z. The impacts of markets and tax on a multinational firm's procurement strategy in China[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2018, 27(2): 251-264. |
| 14 | Niu B Z, Dai Z P, Chen L. Information leakage in a cross-border logistics supply chain considering demand uncertainty and signal inference[J].Annals of Operations Research, 2022, 309: 785-816. |
| 15 | Wang J J, Liu J G, Wang F, et al. Blockchain technology for port logistics capability: exclusive or sharing[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2021, 149: 347-392. |
| 16 | Shen B, Dong C W, Minner S. Combating copycats in the supply chain with permissioned blockchain technology[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2022, 31(1): 138-154. |
| 17 | Radner R. Team decision problems[J].The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1962, 33(3): 857-881. |
| 18 | Gal-Or E. Information sharing in oligopoly[J].Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1985, 53(2): 329-343. |
| 19 | Li L. Cournot oligopoly with information sharing[J]. The RAND Journal of Economics, 1985, 16(4): 521-536. |
| 20 | 余大勇, 钱佳, 陈雪柔, 等. 需求推断差异下供应链成员的运营决策机制[J]. 系统管理学报, 2020, 29(5): 987-993. |
| 20 | Yu D Y, Qian J, Chen X R, et al. Operational Decision-Making mechanism of supply chain members under different demand inferences[J]. Journal of Systems Management, 2020, 29(5): 987-993. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |