As an emerging form of e-commerce, live commerce is developing rapidly. However, there is a common phenomenon of value co-destruction on live commerce platform, which is manifested in differences of objectives among the platform, anchor and buyer, as well as abuse of resources. In order to analyze the influence of the behavior strategies of each subject in the live commerce platform ecosystem on the risk of value co destruction, an evolutionary game model of “platform anchor buyer” value co-destruction is constructed. The payment matrix is established to analyze the interaction behavior and stable state. Numerical simulation is used to verify the correctness of the stable results, and the values of punishment, incentive and network externality income distribution coefficient are adjusted to study their impact on the evolution results. The results show that: the degree of punishment and incentive can affect the phenomenon of co-destruction of value. The greater the punishment degree is, the weaker the governance effect will be. When the incentive degree is too large, the platform and anchors will have behavior shock, and the probability of co-destruction of value will increase; the increase of revenue distribution coefficient plays a positive role in restraining the co-destruction of platform value. In the process of game, the strategic choice of live commerce platform plays a guiding role in the behavior of anchors and buyers. Therefore, live commerce platform needs to establish a responsibility mechanism to lead the governance of value co-destruction of all subjects.
LIU Jian-gang
,
WU Qian
,
ZHANG Mei-juan
. Evolutionary Game of Value Co-Destruction of the Ecosystem of Live Commerce Platform[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023
, 31(3)
: 143
-154
.
DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2022.0951
［1］ 肖红军.责任型平台领导：平台价值共毁的结构性治理［J］.中国工业经济,2020(7):174-192.Xiao Hongjun.Responsible platform leadership:structural governance of platform value co-destruction［J］.China Industrial Economics,2020(7):174-192.
［2］ Prior D D, Marcos-Cuevas J. Value co-destruction in inter-firm relationships: the impact of actor engagement styles［J］. Marketing Theory, 2016, 16(4): 533-552.
［3］ 阳镇,尹西明,陈劲.新冠肺炎疫情背景下平台企业社会责任治理创新［J］.管理学报,2020,17(10):1423-1432.Yang Zheng, Yin Ximing, Chen Jin. Platform corporate social responsibility governance innovation in the context of COVID-19 pandemic［J］. Journal of Management, 2020, 17(10):1423-1432.
［4］ Grnroos C, Voima P.Critical service logic: making sense of value creation and co-creation［J］. Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science, 2013, 41(2): 133-150.
［5］ Pié L, Cceres R C. Not always co-creation: introducing interactional co- destruction of value in service- dominant logic［J］. Journal of Services Marketing, 2010, 24(6): 430-437.
［6］ 关新华,谢礼珊.价值共毁：内涵、研究议题与展望［J］.南开管理评论,2019,22(6):88-98.Guan Xinhua, Xie Lishan. Value co-destruction: connotation, research topics and prospect［J］. Nankai Business Review, 2019, 22(6): 88-98.
［7］ 陈伟,吴宗法,徐菊.价值共毁研究的起源、现状与展望［J］.外国经济与管理,2018,40(6):44-58.Chen Wei, Wu Zongfa, Xu Ju. Value co-destruction research: origin, present and prospect［J］. Foreign Economics & Management, 2018,40(6):44-58.
［8］ Jarvi H, Kahkonen A K, Torvinen H. When value co-creation fails: reasons that lead to value co-destruction［J］. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 2018, 34(1): 63-77.
［9］ Camilleri J, Neuhofer B. Value co-creation and co-destruction in the airbnb sharing economy［J］. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 2017, 29(9): 2322-2340.
［10］ Yin Juelin, Qian Lixian, Shen Sunjie. From value co-creation to value co-destruction? The case of dockless bike sharing in China［J］. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2019, 71(1): 169-185.
［11］ 杨楠.网红直播带货对消费者品牌态度影响机制研究［J］.中央财经大学学报,2021,(2):118-128.Yang Nan. The influence mechanism of web celebrity live broadcast on consumer’s brand attitude［J］. Journal of Central University of Finance & Economics, 2021,(2):118-128.
［12］ Li Donghui, Zhang Guozheng, Xu Zeng, et al. Modeling the roles of celebrity trust and platform trust in consumers’propensity of live-streaming: an extended TAM method［J］. CMC: Computers, Materials & Continua,2018,55(1):137-150.
［13］ 邢鹏,尤浩宇,樊玉臣.考虑平台营销努力的直播电商服务供应链质量努力策略研究［J/OL］.控制与决策:1-8［2021-03-17］.https://doi.org/10.13195/j.kzyjc.2020.1205.Xing Peng, You Haoyu, Fan Yucheng. Optimal quality effort strategy in service supply chain of live streaming e-commerce based on platform marketing effort ［J/OL］. Control and Decision: 1-8［2021-03-17］.https://doi.org/10.13195/j.kzyjc.2020.1205.
［14］ Hou Fangfang, Guan Zhengzhi, Li Boying, et al. Factors influencing people’s continuous watching intention and consumption intention in live streaming［J］. Internet Research,2019,30(1):141-163.
［15］ Katz M L, Shapiro C. Network externalities, competition, and compatibility［J］. The American Economic Review, 1985, 75(3): 424-440.
［16］ Fowler J H, Christakis N A. Cooperative behavior cascades in human social networks［J］. Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences, 2010, 107(12): 5334-5338.
［17］ 李永立,刘超,樊宁远,等.众筹平台上网络外部性的价值度量模型［J］.管理科学学报,2020,23(6):44-58.Li Yongli, Liu Chao, Fan Ningyuan, et al. Value measurement model of network externality in a crowdfunding platform［J］. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2020,23(6):44-58.
［18］ 赵道致,郝家芹,杨洁,等.考虑平台网络外部性的分享经济中三方演化博弈分析［J］.控制与决策,2020,35(7):1741-1750.Zhao Daozhi, Hao Jiaqin, Yang Jie, et al. Evolutionary game analysis of three parties in sharing economy considering network externality of platform［J］. Control and Decision, 2020,35(7):1741-1750.
