主管：中国科学院
主办：中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
　　　中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
Chinese Journal of Management Science

Chinese Journal of Management Science >

2022 , Vol. 30 >Issue 4: 155 - 166

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.0165

Articles

Differential Strategies of Carbon Emission Reduction and Low-carbon Promotion of the Supply Chain under Cap-and-trade Policy

  • 王一雷，夏西强，张言
Expand
  • 1. School of Management Science and Engineering, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics, Dalian 116025, China；2. Business School，Zhengzhou University，Zhengzhou 450001, China；3. Dalian Branch，Shanghai Pudong Development Bank, Dalian 116023, China

Received date: 2021-01-23

  Revised date: 2021-03-23

  Online published: 2022-04-26

Fold

Abstract

With the rapid modernization and urbanization, environmental issues such as global warming caused by carbon emissions are attracted more attention by the international community. Due to its advantages on flexibility and implementation, cap-and-trade regulations are considered as an effective mechanism for supply chains to reduce carbon emissions.In order to analyze long-term impact of different cap-and-trade policies on low-carbon operations of enterprises in the supply chain, three differential game models between the manufacturer and the retailer in a supply chain are established, which are based on the consideration of influencing effects on market demands and dynamic features of the goodwill. In our model, both cap-and-trade regulations and the goodwill of the product are considered, and the goodwill of the product is affected by carbon emission reduction efforts of the manufacturer and low-carbon promotion efforts of the retailer. Compared with no cap-and-trade regulation, carbon emission reduction level of the product and low-carbon promotion level of the retailer can be improved by the implementation of the cap-and-trade policy based on enterprise’s historical carbon emission data. Furthermore, the goodwill of the product and retailer’s profits canalso be improved from the long-term perspective. Compared with cap-and-trade policy based on enterprise’s historical carbon emission data, carbon emission reduction level,the goodwill of the product and retailer’s profits can be further improved by the implementation of the cap-and-trade policy based on product’s carbon emission data, although low-carbon promotion level of the retaileris the same. Once certain conditions of government’s policies are met, the cap-and-trade policy driven by product’s carbon emission data is more beneficial for the manufacturer. Management insights for carbon emission reduction strategies of supply chain members are provided by our research.

Key words： cap-and-trade policy; differential game; supply chain; carbon emission reduction; low-carbon promotion

Cite this article

王一雷，夏西强，张言 . Differential Strategies of Carbon Emission Reduction and Low-carbon Promotion of the Supply Chain under Cap-and-trade Policy[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022 , 30(4) : 155 -166 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.0165

References

［1］ 李友东, 夏良杰, 王锋正. 基于产品替代的低碳供应链博弈与协调模型［J］. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(10): 66-76.Li Youdong, Xia Liangjie, Wang Fengzheng. Game and coordination model for low-carbon supply chain with product substitution［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(10): 66-76.
［2］ 夏良杰, 孔清逸, 李友东, 等. 考虑交叉持股的低碳供应链减排与定价决策研究［J］. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(4): 70-81.Xia Liangjie, Kong Qingyi, Li Youdong, et al. Emission reduction and pricing strategies of a low-carbon supply chain considering cross-shareholding［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(4): 70-81.
［3］ Xia Liangjie, Guo Tingting, Qin Juanjuan, et al. Carbon emission reduction and pricing policies of a supply chain considering reciprocal preferences in cap-and-trade system［J］. Annals of Operations Research, 2018, 268: 149-175.
［4］ Benjaafar S, Li Yanzhi, Daskin M. Carbon footprint and the management of supply chains: Insights from simple models［J］. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2013, 10(1):99-116.
［5］ 李友东, 谢鑫鹏, 王锋正, 等. 考虑碳配额和交易的排放依赖型供应链低碳化运营决策［J］. 控制与决策, 2020, 35(9): 2236-2244.Li Youdong, Xie Xinpeng, Wang Fengzheng, et al. Emission-dependent supply chain low-carbonization based behavior of enterprise operation decision under cap-and-trade environment［J］. Control and Decision, 2020, 35(9): 2236-2244.
［6］ 夏良杰, 柳慧, 张萌, 等. 强制减排规制下基于碳减排利润增量分享契约的供应链协调研究［J］. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(5): 92-107.Xia Liangjie, Liu Hui, Zhang Meng, et al. Supply chain coordination based on incremental profit sharing contract of carbon emission reduction under mandatory carbon emissions capacity scheme［J］. Operations Research and Management Science, 2019, 28(5): 92-107.
［7］ 郭军华, 孙林洋, 张诚, 等. 碳限额交易政策下考虑消费者低碳偏好的供应链定价与协调［J］. 工业工程与管理, 2020, 25(2): 134-145.Guo Junhua, Sun Linyang, Zhang Cheng, et al. Pricing and coordinating of supply chains considering the low-carbon preference of consumers under cap-and-trade mechanism［J］. Industrial Engineering and Management, 2020, 25(2): 134-145.
［8］ 杨磊, 张琴, 张智勇. 碳交易机制下供应链渠道选择与减排策略［J］. 管理科学学报, 2017, 20(11): 75-87.Yang Lei, Zhang Qin, Zhang Zhiyong. Channel selection and carbon emissions reduction policies in supply chains with the cap-and-trade scheme［J］. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2017, 20(11): 75-87.
［9］ 夏良杰, 白永万, 秦娟娟, 等. 碳交易规制下信息不对称供应链的减排和低碳推广博弈研究［J］. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(6): 37-45.Xia Liangjie, Bai Yongwan, Qin Juanjuan, et al. Supply chain’s emission reduction and low carbon promotion policies in cap-and-trade system: The view of information asymmetry［J］. Operations Research and Management Science, 2018, 27(6): 37-45.
［10］ 李新军, 陈美娜, 达庆利. 碳交易视角下政府管制的汽车制造企业闭环供应链优化决策［J］. 管理评论, 2020, 32(5): 269-279.Li Xinjun, Chen Meina, Da Qingli. Optimization decision of government-driving closed-loop supply chain for automobile manufacturers from the perspective of carbon trading［J］. Management Review, 2020, 32(5): 269-279.
［11］ Ma Xin, Ho W, Ji Ping, et al. Contract design with information asymmetry in a supply chain under an emissions trading mechanism［J］. Decision Sciences, 2018, 49(1): 121-153.
［12］ Dong Ciwei, Shen Bin, Chow P S, et al. Sustainability investment under cap-and-trade regulation［J］. Annals of Operations Research, 2016, 240: 509-531.
［13］ Cao Erbao, Yu Man. The bright side of carbon emission permits on supply chain financing and performance［J］. Omega, 2019, 88: 24-39.
［14］ Tang Ruihong, Yang Lei. Impacts of financing mechanism and power structure on supply chains under cap-and-trade regulation［J］. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2020, 139: 101957.
［15］ Du Shaofu, Zhu Lili, Liang Liang, et al. Emission-dependent supply chain and environment-policy-making in the ‘cap-and-trade’ system［J］. Energy Policy, 2013, 57: 61-67.
［16］ 徐春秋, 赵道致,原白云, 等. 上下游联合减排与低碳宣传的微分博弈模型［J］. 管理科学学报, 2016, 19(2): 53-65.Xu Chunqiu, Zhao Daozhi, Yuan Baiyun, et al. Differential game model on joint carbon emission reduction and low-carbon promotion in supply chains［J］. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2016, 19(2): 53-65.
［17］ 赵道致,原白云, 徐春秋. 低碳环境下供应链纵向减排合作的动态协调策略［J］. 管理工程学报, 2016, 30(1): 147-154.Zhao Daozhi, Yuan Baiyun, Xu Chunqiu. Dynamic coordination strategy of vertical cooperative on carbon emission reduction in supply chain under low-carbon era［J］. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2016, 30(1): 147-154.
［18］ 刘名武, 万谧宇, 付红. 碳交易和低碳偏好下供应链低碳技术选择研究［J］. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(1): 152-162.Liu Mingwu, Wan Miyu, Fu Hong. Low-carbon technology for supply chain under cap and trade mechanism with low-carbon preference［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(1): 152-162.
［19］ 徐春秋, 王芹鹏. 考虑政府参与方式的供应链低碳商誉微分博弈模型［J］. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(8): 35-44.Xu Chunqiu, Wang Qinpeng. Differential game models of low carbon reputation considering government participation in supply chain［J］. Operations Research and Management Science, 2020, 29(8): 35-44.
［20］ 叶同, 关志民, 陈大宇. 碳政策下考虑异质消费者的供应链动态优化［J］. 工业工程与管理, 2018, 23(1): 14-22.Ye Tong, Guan Zhimin, Chen Dayu. Dynamic optimization of supply chain under carbon policy considering consumer heterogeneity［J］. Industrial Engineering and Management, 2018, 23(1): 14-22.
［21］ Zhou Yanju, Ye Xin. Differential game model of joint emission reduction strategies and contract design in a dual-channel supply chain［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 190: 592-607.
［22］ Xia Xiqiang, Ruan Junhu, Juan Zhiru, et al. Upstream-downstream joint carbon reduction strategies based on low-carbon promotion［J］. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2018, 15(7): 1351.
［23］ Zu Yafei, Chen Lianghua, Fan Yi. Research on low-carbon strategies in supply chain with environmental regulations based on differential game［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 177: 527-546.
［24］ Giovanni P D. Quality improvement vs. advertising support: Which strategy works better for a manufacturer?［J］. European Journal of Operational Research, 2011, 208(2): 119-130.
［25］ He Xiuli, Prasad A, Sethi S P. Cooperative advertising and pricing in a dynamic stochastic supply chain: Feedback Stackelberg strategies［J］. Production and Operations Management, 2009, 18(1): 78-94.
［26］ Bryson A E, 何硫琦. 应用最优控制—最优化·估计·控制［M］. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 1982.Bryson A E,He Liuqi.Applied optimal control— optimization, estimation,and control［M］.Beijing:National Defense Industry Press,1982.
［27］ Sadegheih A. Optimal design methodologies under the carbon emission trading program using MIP, GA, SA, and TS［J］. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2011, 15 (1), 504-513.
［28］ 赵黎明, 李聪, 郭祥. 基于微分博弈的政企救灾合作策略研究［J］. 系统工程理论与实践, 2018, 38(4): 885-898.Zhao Liming, Li Cong, Guo Xiang. Research of cooperative relief strategy between government and enterprise based on differential game［J］. System Engineering-Theory and Practice, 2018, 38(4): 885-898.
［29］ Xia Xiqiang, Li Chengyu, Zhu Qinghua. Game analysis for the impact of carbon trading on low-carbon supply chain［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 276:123220.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉