主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
Articles

Tiered Pricing based Ongraded Quality of Used Parts and “Trade-in for Remanufactured” Subsidy

Expand
  • 1. School of Management Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China;
    2. China Institute of Manufacturing Development, Nanjing 210044, China;
    3. Department of Marketing and Logistics Management, Chung Chou University of Science and Technology, Changhua 51003, Taiwan China;
    4. School of Economics and Management, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China

Received date: 2017-03-09

  Revised date: 2018-01-28

  Online published: 2019-03-25

Abstract

The "trade-in for remanufactured" subsidy has been piloted in China,by which the market purchasing behaviors of related new and remanufactured parts and the enterprise's pricing decisions are affected.Based on characteristics of the parts' different distribution channels, the market is segmented according to used part's quality grades in after-sale channel. In consideration of subsidy and customer's trade-in preference,the manufacturer's profit model of tiered pricing is constructed and piecewise optimized.With the optimized pricing strategies, the cost conditions for enterprise to build tiered remanufacturing system and the suggestions for government to award remanufactured partsubsidy qualification are concluded. Since the remanufacturing environment of leading and general enterprises is different, different example analyses are taken to show the subsidy's influences on pricing decisions of leading and general remanufacturing enterprises, and also the impacts on tiered remanufacturing decisions of general enterprise with changing customer's trade-in preference. Results indicate that tiered pricing can boost the overall profits of the remanufacturing system while the trade-in subsidy shows different effects on leading and general enterprises, so the timing and proportion of subsidy should be chosen based on the characteristics of the target industries and enterprises combined with other measures.

Cite this article

LI Yan, LIN Xin-yi, DA Qing-li . Tiered Pricing based Ongraded Quality of Used Parts and “Trade-in for Remanufactured” Subsidy[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019 , 27(1) : 131 -142 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.01.013

References

[1] 达庆利, 黄祖庆, 张钦. 逆向物流系统结构研究的现状及展望[J]. 中国管理科学, 2004, 12(1): 131-138.

[2] Thierry M, Salomon M,Van Nunen J, et al. Strategic issues in product recovery management[J]. California Management Review, 1995, 37(2): 114-135.

[3] Guide V D R, Van Wassenhove L N. OR FORUM-the evolution of closed-loop supply chain research[J]. Operations Research, 2009, 57(1): 10-18.

[4] Guide V D R, Li Jiayi. The potential for cannibalization of new products sales by remanufactured products[J]. Decision Sciences, 2010, 41(3): 547-572.

[5] 中国物资再生协会. 旧件回收困难制约再制造行业发展[J]. 中国资源综合利用, 2016, 34(3):5-6.

[6] Zhao Senlin, Zhu Qinghua, Cui Li. A decision-making model for remanufacturers: Considering both consumers’ environmental preference and the government subsidy policy[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2018, 128: 176-186.

[7] Atasu A, Sarvary M, Van Wassenhove L N. Remanufacturing as a marketing strategy[J]. Management Science, 2008, 54(10): 1731-1746.

[8] Ferrer G, Swaminathan J M. Managing new andremanufactured products[J]. Management Science, 2006, 52(1): 15-26.

[9] Guide V D R, Teunter R H. Van Wassenhove L N. Matching demand and supply to maximize profits from remanufacturing [J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management. 2003,5(4): 303-316.

[10] Bhattacharya R, Kaur A. Allocation of external returns of different quality grades to multiple stages of a closed loop supply chain[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 2015, 37(3):692-702.

[11] Mashhadi A R, Behdad S. Optimal sorting policies in remanufacturing systems: Application of product life-cycle data in quality grading and end-of-use recovery[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 2017, 43:15-24.

[12] 尹君, 谢家平, 刘娟. 旧件分级回收再制造决策机制研究[J]. 上海管理科学, 2017, 39(3):22-29.

[13] Van Loon P, Van Wassenhove L N. Assessing the economic and environmental impact of remanufacturing: A decision support tool for OEM suppliers[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2017,56(4): 1-13.

[14] 徐滨士, 李恩重, 郑汉东, 等. 我国再制造产业及其发展战略[J]. 中国工程科学, 2017, 19(3): 61-65.

[15] 李新然, 吴义彪. 以旧换再补贴对双渠道销售闭环供应链的影响[J]. 科研管理, 2015, 36(9):106-118.

[16] Webster S, Mitra S. Competitive strategy in remanufacturing and the impact of take-back laws[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2007, 25(6): 1123-1140.

[17] Mitra S, Webster S. Competition in remanufacturing and the effects of government subsidies[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2008, 111(2): 287-298.

[18] Aksen D, Aras N, Karaarslan A G. Design and analysis of government subsidized collection systems for incentive-dependent returns[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2009, 119(2): 308-327.

[19] Cole D, Mahapatra S, Webster S. A Comparison of buyback and trade-in policies to acquire used products for remanufacturing[J]. Journal of Business Logistics, 2017, 38(3): 217-232.

[20] 刘慧慧,刘涛.电器电子产品基金补贴和市场合作对正规回收渠道的影响研究[J].中国管理科学,2017,25(05):87-96.

[21] 王文宾,邓雯雯.逆向供应链的政府奖惩机制与税收-补贴机制比较研究[J].中国管理科学,2016,24(04):102-110.

[22] 张汉江,余华英,李聪颖.闭环供应链上的回收激励契约设计与政府补贴再制造政策的优化[J].中国管理科学,2016,24(08):71-78.

[23] Ma Weimin, Zhao Zhang, Ke Hua. Dual-channel closed-loop supply chain with government consumption-subsidy[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2013, 226(2): 221-227.

[24] 马卫民, 赵璋. 以旧换新补贴对具有不同等级产品闭环供应链的影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2013, 21(3): 113-117.

[25] 李新然, 吴义彪. 政府"以旧换再"补贴下的差别定价闭环供应链[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2015,(8):1983-1995.

[26] 夏西强, 朱庆华, 赵森林. 政府补贴下制造/再制造竞争机理研究[J]. 管理科学学报, 2017, 20(4): 71-83.

[27] 孙浩, 叶俊, 胡劲松, 等. 不同决策模式下制造商与再制造商的博弈策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017,25(1): 160-169.

[28] 朱庆华, 夏西强, 李幻云. 政府补贴与专利费用下制造与再制造博弈模型[J]. 系统工程学报, 2017, 32(1): 8-18.

[29] 周丹. 我国汽车零部件再制造现状与发展研究——以发动机再制造为例[J]. 质量与标准化, 2013,(7):56-59..

[30] 问卷星.消费者汽车发动机再制造品感知价值调查问卷[EB/OL]. [2014-11].http://www.sojump.com/jq/2269237.aspx.
Outlines

/