The securities market is the core of market economy. A securities market with high efficiency is necessary for the development of a country. The scale and competitiveness of the Chinese Securities Market is improving constantly in recent years, which is in accordance with the poor performance in the aspect of internationalization. Based on the research of Lo (2013) that analyzed the competitiveness and the ranking of the 45 main stock exchanges all over the world, internationalization indexes are introduced and the competitiveness of Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchange is further studied with the panel data. First, the dynamic evolution of competitiveness of Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchange is analyzed and the ranking of development speed of competitiveness of the 45 main stock exchanges is got with the DEA-Malmquist model and the panel data of 2008-2016(except2011). Secondly, the latest ranking of competitiveness of the 45 main stock exchanges is obtained with the context-dependent DEA model and the cross-section data of 2016. Besides, the ranking of internationalization of Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchange in 2013 and the ranking in 2016 are compared to study the change of internationalization of Chinese securities market. The results show that the listing competitiveness and the trading competitiveness of Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchange are promoting rapidly. The listing competitiveness of Shanghai Stock Exchange and the trading competitiveness of Shenzhen Stock Exchange are both at forefront, but the development of these two exchanges is disequilibrium especially in listing competitiveness. Compared to 2013, the degree of internationalization of Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchange is both improved, which indicates that the open policies such as Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect, Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect and QFⅡ are positive to Chinese securities market. But they are still in a backward state, which might be the restraint of the improvement of competitiveness. For the sake of forging world-class securities market and achieving the goal of capital power, the successful experience of Singapore, Hong Kong and India should be learned, and the work of wiping off the policy-dependent stock market and internationalization especially the optimization dividend policy and shareholder protection, enriching the trade category, enlarging interconnection and establish "international market" and so on should be accomplished. Compared to similar past literature, internationalization indexes are introduced and the focus is put on dynamic evolution and policy effect of competitiveness of Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchange from the view of international perspective.
YI Rong-hua, SHAO Jie-hao
. International Comparison of Chinese Securities Market Competitiveness Based on DEA[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019
, 27(1)
: 11
-21
.
DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.01.002
[1] Pagano M, Randl O, Röell A A, et al. What makes stock exchanges succeed? Evidence from cross-listing decisions[J]. European Economic Review, 2001, 45(4):770-782.
[2] Wang C A. What makes some stock markets more attractive? An international cross-listing analysis[J]. Working Paper, National Chi-Nan University, 2008.
[3] Thaddenb R E L V. Stock exchange competition in a simple model of capital market equilibrium[J]. Journal of Financial Markets, 2008, 11(3):284-307.
[4] Amira K, Muzere M L. Competition among stock exchanges for equity[J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2011, 35(9):2355-2373.
[5] Lo S F. Which stock exchanges are more attractive? The competition analysis of listing and trading performance [J]. Economic Modelling, 2013, 30(1):501-509.
[6] 闫红蕾, 赵胜民. 沪港通能否促进A股与香港股票市场一体化[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(11):1-10.
[7] Banker R D, Charnes A, Cooper W W. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis [J]. Management Science, 1984, 30(9): 1078-1092.
[8] Lovell C A K, Pastor J T. Radial DEA models without inputs or without outputs[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1999, 118(1):46-51.
[9] Seiford L M, Zhu J. Context-dependent data envelopment analysis—measuring attractiveness and progress [J]. Omega, 2003, 31(5): 397-408.
[10] Karreman B, van der Knaap B. The financial centres of Shanghai and Hong Kong: Competition or complementarity?[J]. Environment and Planning A, 2009, 41(3): 563-580.
[11] Baker H K, Nofsinger J R, Weaver D G. International cross-listing and visibility [J]. Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis, 2002, 37(3):495-521.
[12] Klein E. Stock exchanges, IPO's and mutual funds[M]. New York: Nova Science Publishers, 2005.
[13] Thaler R H, Shefrin H M. An economic theory of self-control[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1981, 89(2):392-406.
[14] Sheu H J, Lo S F, Lin H H. Linking diversification strategy to performance: A case for financial holding companies in Taiwan[J]. Journal of Transnational Management, 2006, 11(3): 61-79.
[15] 刘克峰.国际资本流动与中国证券市场国际化[D].北京:中国社会科学院, 2003.
[16] Chinn M D, Ito H. A new measure of financial openness[J]. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis Research & Practice, 2008, 10(3):309-322.
[17] 杨子晖,陈创练.金融深化条件下的跨境资本流动效应研究[J].金融研究, 2015, (5):34-49.
