主管：中国科学院
主办：中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
　　　中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
中国管理科学

中国管理科学 >

2023 , Vol. 31 >Issue 1: 92 - 103

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.1077

论文

加征关税下的跨国供应链决策及补贴策略研究

  • 刘名武 ,
  • 付巧灵 ,
  • 刘亚琼
展开
  • 重庆交通大学经济与管理学院，重庆 400074

收稿日期: 2020-06-06

  修回日期: 2020-12-29

  网络出版日期: 2023-02-09

基金资助

重庆市社会科学规划一般项目(2020YBGL68)；重庆市自然科学基金资助项目(CSTB2022NSCQ-MSX1325)；四川省循环经济研究中心重点课题(XHJJ-2004)；四川省系统科学与企业发展研究中心课题(Xq20C01)

收起

Decision-Making and Subsidy Strategy of a Multinational Supply Chain Suffered to Import Tariff

  • LIU Ming-wu ,
  • FU Qiao-ling ,
  • LIU Ya-qiong
Expand
  • School of Economics and Management, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China

Received date: 2020-06-06

  Revised date: 2020-12-29

  Online published: 2023-02-09

Fold

摘要

本文讨论加征关税视角下的供应链决策及补贴策略问题。基于本国制造商、分销商与国外进口零售商所组成的三级跨国供应链，分别讨论了政府不补贴、政府补贴下的供应链决策，研究加征关税和补贴对供应链的影响，并分析保持产品销售价不变补贴策略(I)、保持制造商利润不变补贴策略(II)及社会福利最大化补贴策略(III)的效应。结果表明，加征关税导致产品销售价增大和本国企业批发价、供应链各企业利润及社会福利的降低，但政府提高补贴使得产品销售价减小和供应链各企业利润增大，而社会福利随着补贴的增大先增大后减小。随着加征关税税率及补贴的增大，供应链更多地表现为补贴的作用，补贴能有效减小加征关税的影响。在较低关税税率下，策略(III)激励产品出口作用显著，但政府补贴支出过高；策略(II)相较策略(I)激励效果更显著，但补贴支出更大。在较高关税税率下，策略(II)更能激励制造商出口,策略(I)以较低的补贴支出激励制造商出口，更有利于维持国际市场稳定。

关键词： 跨国供应链；加征关税；政府补贴；供应链决策；社会福利

本文引用格式

刘名武 , 付巧灵 , 刘亚琼 . 加征关税下的跨国供应链决策及补贴策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023 , 31(1) : 92 -103 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.1077

Abstract

The high-quality development of manufacturing is regarded as an important part of China's efforts to build a modern economic system. The high-quality development of manufacturing depends on the supply chain. However, the current international trade friction intensifies, which leads to the instability of the global supply chain on which enterprises depend for survival, and brings challenges to the globalization development of China's manufacturing supply chain. The imposition of tariffs as a measure of trade protection has exacerbated trade frictions. Therefore, in the context of international trade disputes and high-quality national economic development, it is particularly important to carry out research on global supply chain’s decision-making. The decision-making of global supply chains is studied under the perspective of tariff increases.

Key words： multinational supply chain; import tariff; government subsidy; supply chain decisions; social welfare

参考文献

［1］ He Rongrong, Zhu Dan, Chen Xiaowei, et al. How the trade barrier changes environmental costs of agricultural production: an implication derived from China's demand for soybean caused by the US-China trade war［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 227(22): 578-588.
［2］ 兰宜生, 徐小锋. 关税保护对不同产业全球价值链参与度的影响差异-基于一般制造业和高技术产业的比较研究［J］. 软科学, 2019, 33(4): 25-28.Lan Yisheng, Xu Xiaofeng. The impact of tariff protection on the participation of global value chains in different industries—a comparative study based on general manufacturing and high-tech industries［J］. Soft Science, 2019, 33(4): 25-28.
［3］ Rizov M, Pokrivcak J, Ciaian P. CAP subsidies and productivity of the EU farms［J］. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2013, 64(3): 537-557.
［4］ Lou Yanfeng, Tian Yezhuang, Wang Kai. The spillover effect of US industrial subsidies on China’s exports［J］. Sustainability, 2020, 12(7): 1-12.
［5］ Nagurney A, Besik D, Dong J. Tariffs and quotas in world trade: a unified variational inequality framework［J］. European Journal of Operational Research, 2019, 275(1): 347-360.
［6］ Nagurney A, Besik D, Nagurney L S. Global supply chain networks and tariff rate quotas: equilibrium analysis with application to agricultural products［J］. Journal of Global Optimization, 2019, 75(2): 439-460.
［7］ Chen Bo, Ma Hong, Jacks D S. Revisiting the effective rate of protection in the late stages of Chinese industrialisation［J］. The World Economy,2017,40(2):424-438.
［8］ 汪亚楠, 周梦天. 贸易政策不确定性、关税减免与出口产品分布［J］. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2017, 34(12): 127-142.Wang Yanan, Zhou Mengtian. Trade policy uncertainty, tariff reduction and exporters’ product distribution［J］. The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, 2017, 34(12): 127-142.
［9］ 田巍, 余淼杰. 企业出口强度与进口中间品贸易自由化:来自中国企业的实证研究［J］. 管理世界, 2013(1): 28-44.Tian Wei, Yu Miaojie. Export intensity of enterprises and trade liberalization of imported intermediates: an empirical study from Chinese enterprises［J］. Journal of Management World, 2013(1): 28-44.
［10］ Cipollina M, Salvatici L. On the effects of EU trade policy: agricultural tariffs still matter［J］. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 2020, 47(4): 1367-1401.
［11］ 余淼杰,袁东.贸易自由化、加工贸易与成本加成-来自我国制造业企业的证据［J］.管理世界,2016(9):33-43.Yu Miaojie, Yuan Dong. Trade liberalization, processing trade and cost markup—evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises［J］. Journal of Management World, 2016(9): 33-43.
［12］ 田巍,余淼杰.中间品贸易自由化和企业研发:基于中国数据的经验分析［J］.世界经济,2014,37(6): 90-112.Tian Wei, Yu Miaojie. Intermediate goods trade liberalization and corporate R&D: an empirical analysis based on Chinese data［J］. The Journal of World Economy, 2014, 37(6): 90-112.
［13］ Liu Qing, Qiu Larry D. Intermediate input imports and innovations: evidence from Chinese firms’ patent filings［J］. Journal of International Economics, 2016, 103(6): 166-183.
［14］ 刘名武,翟梦月,陈翔.关税和补贴视角下的跨国绿色供应链决策研究［J］. 软科学, 2019,33(9): 21-26.Liu Mingwu, Zhai Mengyue, Chen Xiang. Decision-making of transnational green supply chain from the perspectives of tariff and subsidy［J］. Soft Science, 2019, 33(9): 21-26.
［15］ 段玉婉, 刘丹阳, 倪红福.全球价值链视角下的关税有效保护率-兼评美国加征关税的影响［J］. 中国工业经济, 2018(7): 62-79.Duan Yuwan, Liu Danyang, Ni Hongfu. A measure of tariff effective rate of protection from the perspective of global value chain—comments on the effects of increasing tariff taken by U.S.［J］. China Industrial Economics, 2018(7): 62-79.
［16］ 岳万勇, 赵正佳. 不确定需求下跨国供应链数量折扣模型［J］. 管理评论, 2012, 24(9): 164-169.Yue Wanyong， Zhao Zhengjia. Global supply chain quantity discount model under uncertain demand［J］. Management Review, 2012, 24(9): 164-169.
［17］ 赵正佳. 需求不确定且依赖于价格下全球供应链数量折扣及其组合契约［J］. 管理工程学报, 2015, 29(3): 90-99.Zhao Zhengjia. Quantity discount and its combined contract for global supply chain under uncertain and price-dependant demand ［J］. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2015, 29(3): 90-99.
［18］ 梁喜, 梁伦海. 关税与成本变动下零售商主导的跨境双渠道供应链定价决策［J］. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(11): 99-110.Liang Xi, Liang Lunhai. Retailer-dominated pricing decision of cross-border dual-channe supply chain under tariff and cost changes［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(11): 99-110.
［19］ Cole M T, Eckel C. Tariffs and markups in retailing［J］. Journal of International Economics, 2018, 113(4): 139-153.
［20］ Brander J A, Spencer B J. Export subsidies and international market share rivalry［J］. Journal of international Economics, 1985, 18(1-2): 83-100.
［21］ Desai M A, Hines J R. Market reactions to export subsidies［J］. Journal of International Economics, 2008, 74(2): 459-474.
［22］ Abbasi B N, Umer M, Shah S I, et al. Impact of export subsidies on pakistan’s exports［J］. American Journal of Economics, 2019, 9(1): 11-16.
［23］ Yoon J, Choi K. Why do export subsidies still exist? R&D and output subsidies［J］. Japan and the World Economy, 2018,45: 30-38.
［24］ 施炳展,逯建,王有鑫.补贴对中国企业出口模式的影响:数量还是价格?［J］. 经济学,2013,12(4):1413-1442.Shi Bingzhan, lu Jian, Wang Youxing. The effects of subsidy on export: quantity or price?［J］. China Economic Quarterly, 2013, 12(4): 1413-1442.
［25］ 杨连星, 张秀敏, 姚程飞. 异质性出口质量与出口价格变动效应研究-来自中国情境下的微观证据［J］. 世界经济研究, 2015(9): 37-49.Yang Lianxing, Zhang Xiumin, Yao Chengfei. Study on heterogeneous export quality and effect of export price changes: the microscopic evidence from Chinese scenarios［J］. World Economy Studies, 2015(9): 37-49.
［26］ 施炳展. 补贴对中国企业出口行为的影响-基于配对倍差法的经验分析［J］. 财经研究, 2012, 38(5): 70-80.Shi Bingzhan. The effects of subsidies on corporate export behavior in China: empiric analysis based on matching difference-in-difference method［J］. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2012, 38(5): 70-80.
［27］ 苏振东, 洪玉娟, 刘璐瑶. 政府生产性补贴是否促进了中国企业出口?-基于制造业企业面板数据的微观计量分析［J］. 管理世界, 2012(5): 24-42.Su Zhendong, Hong Yujuan, Liu Luyao. Have the production-related subsidies of the government promoted the export of China’s firms? ［J］. Journal of Management World, 2012(5): 24-42.
［28］ Felbermayr G, Jung B, Larch M. The welfare consequences of import tariffs: a quantitative perspective［J］. Journal of International Economics, 2015, 97(2): 295-309.
［29］ 孙小军, 张亮, 徐小聪, 等. 政府生产性补贴会促进企业成本加成率增加吗［J］. 宏观经济研究, 2017(3): 56-67.Sun Xiaojun, Zhang Liang,Xu Xiaocong. Will government productive subsidies promote the increase of enterprise cost markup?［J］. Macroeconomics, 2017(3): 56-67.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉