主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
论文

在线负面口碑处理的专家识别方法研究

展开
  • 1. 华中科技大学管理学院, 湖北 武汉 430074;
    2. 深圳证券交易所, 广东 深圳 518038;
    3. 华中科技大学新闻与信息传播学院, 湖北 武汉 430074

收稿日期: 2017-02-27

  修回日期: 2018-04-25

  网络出版日期: 2019-04-28

基金资助

国家自然科学基金资助项目(71371081);教育部博士点基金资助项目(20130142110044);华中科技大学创新研究院技术创新基金资助项目(CXY13Q033)

Research on the Expert Identification Method of Online Negative Word-of-mouth Handling

Expand
  • 1. School of Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China;
    2. Shenzhen Stock Exchange, Shenzhen 518038, China;
    3. School of Journalism and Information Communication, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China

Received date: 2017-02-27

  Revised date: 2018-04-25

  Online published: 2019-04-28

摘要

现有专家识别大多建立在专家知识能力的基础上,然而在负面口碑处理的专家识别中,仅考虑知识能力并不能满足各主体的价值需求。本文从资源角度理解专家识别,建立了专家识别资源映射框架,并依据此框架分析了专家识别的显性资源映射和隐性资源映射过程。除了考虑直接体现用户专业水平的知识能力,还考虑了专家参与的情感抚慰能力和互动程度能力,以此构建的人工神经网络模型在实验中表现出了良好的性能。

本文引用格式

蔡淑琴, 王旸, 王艺兴, 秦志勇, 窦聪颖 . 在线负面口碑处理的专家识别方法研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019 , 27(3) : 189 -197 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.03.019

Abstract

In the era of Web2.0, social media is not only the access for users to get information, but also the platform for them to post and build a relationship. User participation, user-led and user creation have become a powerful tool for social media to attract users, enhance competitiveness and improve enterprise value, generating a large number of User Generated Content (referred to as "UGC") of great business value. As a unique form of UGC, Online Negative Word-of-Mouth (referred to as "ONWOM") is a kind of negative view or comment which the consumers express on the Internet. If the company does not respond to it in time, it will lead to a large area of dissatisfaction, resulting in damage to corporate reputation, brand value and other serious consequences. However, due to the large number, the fast speed of transmission and other characteristics of ONWOM, the company will face the dilemma of high costs, slow responses and resource shortages if just relies on the traditional manual processing method. In handling negative word-of-mouth, excessive participation of the company may made itself be suspected, resulting in the loss of credibility. Therefore, taking a small number of experts with more knowledge in UGC as a resource for ONWOM processing, a new way to deal with ONWOM for companies can be provided.
Most studies in the field of expert recognition only focus on the knowledge capability of experts. However, it cannot meet the value demands of each subject in the processing of ONWOM. From the perspective of resources, a resource mapping framework of expert recognition is established, and the explicit and implicit resource mapping process based on it is analyzed. In addition to considering the ability which directly reflects the professional level of the experts, the emotional comfort ability when experts deal with ONWOM is comsidered, and emotional infection mechanism to obtain the quantitative indicators of emotional ability is used. Moreover, as a prerequisite for resource integration and emotional infection, the interaction degree is also introduced into the user's capacity characteristic space to construct the artificial neural network model for the expert recognition of ONWOM processing. By comparing the experimental results, it is found that the model proposed in this paper can significantly improve the recognition performance in the expert recognition of ONWOM processing. In addition, a new method for expert recognition is provided by the resource mapping framework proposed in this paper, and a new idea for understanding the ability structure of the expert of ONWOM processing is provided.

参考文献

[1] Lee Y L, Song S. An empirical investigation of electronic word-of-mouth:Informational motive and corporate response strategy[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2010, 26(5):1073-1080.

[2] Kotler P. Reinventing marketing to manage the environmental imperative[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2011, 75(4):132-135.

[3] Thomas J B, Peters C O, Howell E G, et al. Social media and negative word of mouth:Strategies for handing unexpecting comments[J]. Atlantic Marketing Journal, 2012, 1(2):87-108.

[4] Herr P M, Kardes F R, Kim J. Effects of word-of-mouth and product-attribute information on persuasion:An accessibility-diagnosticity perspective[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 1991, 17(4):454-462.

[5] Laczniak R N, DeCarlo T E, Ramaswami S N. Consumers' responses to negative word-of-mouth communication:An attribution theory perspective[J]. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2001, 11(1):57-73.

[6] Riahi F, Zolaktaf Z, Shafiei M, et al. Finding expert users in community question answering[C]//Proceedings of the 21st international conference companion on World Wide Web, Lyon,France,April 16-20,ACM Press,2012:791-798.

[7] Dellarocas C. Strategic manipulation of internet opinion forums:Implications for consumers and firms[J]. Management Science, 2006, 52(10):1577-1593.

[8] Vernette E, Hamdi-Kidar L. Co-creation with consumers:Who has the competence and wants to cooperate[J]. International Journal of Market Research, 2013, 55(4):539-561.

[9] 闫强, 孟跃. 在线评论的感知有用性影响因素——基于在线影评的实证研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2013,(s1):126-131.

[10] Archak N, Ghose A, Ipeirotis P G. Deriving the pricing power of product features by mining consumer reviews[J]. Management Science, 2011, 57(8):1485-1509.

[11] Pfeffer J, Zorbach T, Carley K M. Understanding online firestorms:Negative word-of-mouth dynamics in social media networks[J]. Journal of Marketing Communications, 2014, 20(1-2):117-128.

[12] Surachartkumtonkun J, Patterson P G, McColl-Kennedy J R. Customer rage back-story:Linking needs-based cognitive appraisal to service failure type[J]. Journal of Retailing, 2013, 89(1):72-87.

[13] 蔡淑琴, 马玉涛, 王瑞. 在线口碑传播的意见领袖识别方法研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2013,21(2):185-192.

[14] Yang C, Ma J, Silva T, et al. A multilevel information mining approach for expert recommendation in online scientific communities[J]. The Computer Journal, 2015, 58(9):1921-1936.

[15] Cha M, Haddadi H, Benevenuto F, et al. Measuring user influence in Twitter:The million follower fallacy[C]//Proceedings of the 4th international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media, Washington DC, USA, May 23-26,2010:10-17.

[16] Korfiatis N, García-Bariocanal E, Sánchez Alonso S. Evaluating content quality and helpfulness of online product reviews:The interplay of review helpfulness vs. review content[J]. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2012, 11(3):205-217.

[17] Hayne S C, Pollard C E, Rice R E. Identification of comment authorship in anonymous group support systems[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2003, 20(1):301-329.

[18] Hatfield E, Cacioppo J T, Rapson R L. Emotional contagion[M]. Cambidge, UK:Cambridge university press, 1994.

[19] 杜建刚, 范秀成. 服务消费中多次情绪感染对消费者负面情绪的动态影响机制[J]. 心理学报, 2009,41(4):346-356.

[20] Chae M, Kim J, Kim H, et al. Information quality for mobile internet services:A theoretical model with empirical validation[J]. Electronic Markets, 2002, 12(1):38-46.

[21] Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior:An introduction to theory and research[M]. Boston, USA:Addison Wesley,1975.

[22] Liao Hui. Do it right this time:the role of employee service recovery performance in customer-perceived justice and customer loyalty after service failures[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2007, 92(2):475-489.
文章导航

/