主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
论文

考虑满意度的两阶段DEA固定成本分摊方法

展开
  • 1. 中国光大集团博士后工作站, 北京 100033;
    2. 清华大学五道口金融学院博士后流动站, 北京 100083;
    3. 北京理工大学管理与经济学院, 北京 100081;
    4. 延安大学经济与管理学院, 陕西 延安 716000

收稿日期: 2017-05-02

  修回日期: 2017-05-31

  网络出版日期: 2019-04-24

基金资助

国家自然科学基金重点资助项目(71432002);北京理工大学研究生国际学术交流项目(1320012351601);延安大学博士科研启动项目(YDBK2018-38)

A Fixed Cost Allocation Based on Two-stage DEA and Satisfaction Degree

Expand
  • 1. Postdoctoral Workstation, China Everbright Group, Beijing 100033, China;
    2. Postdoctoral Research Station, PBC School of Finance, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100083, China;
    3. School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China;
    4. School of Economic and Management, Yanan University, Yanan 71600, China

Received date: 2017-05-02

  Revised date: 2017-05-31

  Online published: 2019-04-24

摘要

考虑具有相同的投入和产出的两阶段决策单元的固定成本分摊问题。将待分摊的固定成本作为一种新的投入,建立两阶段加性DEA模型。首先证明了各决策单元从自身角度出发可以找到至少一种分摊方案,使其自身整体和阶段效率都达到Pareto有效。然后证明了在公共的权重下,至少存在一种分摊方案可以使得各决策单元整体和阶段效率都达到Pareto有效。并给出了这样的有效成本分摊方案集。为了得到公平的成本分摊方案,定义了各DMU各阶段对分摊方案的满意度,最大化最小的满意度,可以得到最终的成本分摊方案。将问题拓展到两阶段存在共享投入的生产系统中,这些性质定理同样成立。数值算例部分将本文与Yu等(2016)的研究结果进行了对比,验证了本文方法的有效性,指出了本文方法的优越性。本文的方法综合考虑了效率和公平,得到的固定成本分摊方案公平合理。

本文引用格式

张冉, 冉伦, 杜涛, 李金林 . 考虑满意度的两阶段DEA固定成本分摊方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019 , 27(2) : 138 -149 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.02.014

Abstract

In this paper, the fixed cost allocation problem among the decision making units (DMU) with two stages is considered. First, the fixed cost is treated as an additional input to DMUs, and an additive two-stage DEA model is established. Then, some important theorems are proven:1. each DMU could find at least one allocation plan to make its total and each stage Pareto efficient; 2. there is at least one allocation plan for all DMUs and their stages to be Pareto efficient under a set of common weight; 3. the efficient fixed cost allocation set is provided. These theorems are also founded when it is expanded to the two-stage system with shared inputs. In order to obtain an equitable allocation, the satisfaction degree of each DMU's stage is defined. Through maximizing the minimal satisfaction degree, the final allocation plan is gotten. The numerical example shows that our approach is feasible and valid. Since the efficiency and fairness is considered together, the fixed cost allocation obtained from our approach is fair and valid. Our approach can give managers supports when they face cost allocation problems.

参考文献

[1] Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, 2(6):429-444.

[2] Cook W D, Kress M. Characterizing an equitable allocation of shared costs:A DEA approach[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1999, 119(3):652-661.

[3] Beasley J E. Allocating fixed costs and resources via data envelopment analysis[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2003, 147(1):198-216.

[4] 李勇军,梁樑.一种基于DEA与Nash讨价还价博弈的固定成本分摊方法[J]. 系统工程, 2008, 26(6):73-77.

[5] 李勇军, 梁樑, 凌六一. 基于DEA联盟博弈核仁解的固定成本分摊方法研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2009, 17(1):58-63.

[6] Li Yongjun, Yang Min, Chen Ya, et al. Allocating a fixed cost based on data envelopment analysis and satisfaction degree[J]. Omega, 2013, 41(1):55-60.

[7] Du Juan, Cook W D, Liang Liang, et al. Fixed cost and resource allocation based on DEA cross-efficiency[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2014, 235(1):206-214.

[8] Cook W D, Zhu J. Allocation of shared costs among decision making units:A DEA approach[J].Computers & Operations Research, 2005, 32(8):2171-2178.

[9] 雷西洋, 戴前智, 李勇军,等. 考虑系统内部平行结构的DEA资源分摊方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(1):50-55.

[10] Kao C, Hwang S N. Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis:An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2008, 185(1):418-429.

[11] Chen Yao, Cook W D, Li Ning, et al. Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 196(3):1170-1176.

[12] 毕功兵, 梁樑, 杨锋. 两阶段生产系统的DEA效率评价模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2007, 15(2):92-96.

[13] 孙玉华, 曾庆铎. 基于DEA的二阶段网络系统的固定成本分摊方法[J]. 经济数学, 2013,30(1):33-36.

[14] Yu M M, Chen L H, Hsiao B. A fixed cost allocation based on the two-stage network data envelopment approach[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2016, 69(5):1817-1822.

[15] Golany B, Tamir E. Evaluating efficiency-effectiveness-equality trade-offs:A data envelopment analysis approach[J]. Management Science, 1995, 41(7):1172-1184.

[16] Chen Yao, Du Juan, Sherman H D, et al. DEA model with shared resources and efficiency decomposition[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 207(1):339-349.
文章导航

/