主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
论文

银行投资组合多元化与系统性风险的关系研究

展开
  • 东南大学经济管理学院, 江苏 南京 211189

收稿日期: 2017-11-01

  修回日期: 2018-03-25

  网络出版日期: 2019-04-24

基金资助

国家自然科学基金资助项目(71371051);江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划项目(KYCX17_0193)

Study on the Relationship between Investment Portfolios Diversification and Systemic Risk

Expand
  • School of Economics & Management, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China

Received date: 2017-11-01

  Revised date: 2018-03-25

  Online published: 2019-04-24

摘要

在现代金融系统中,人们逐渐开始关注整个银行业的系统性风险而不仅仅是个体风险,而传统经济学中个体银行投资组合多元化理论对于系统性风险来说并不一定是有效的,因此对于银行投资组合多元化与系统性风险之间的关系仍需要深入研究。本文基于简化的金融市场,通过资产负债表刻画银行和资产之间的联系,构建了描述银行破产边界的数学模型,并以此为基础分别研究了银行个体风险、系统性风险、考虑拆借关系的系统性风险以及同时考虑减价出售和拆借关系的系统性风险之间的区别与联系,进而分析了银行投资组合多元化对不同风险的影响。最后,参考实际金融市场中的参数取值,对本文构建的模型进行了数值实验,研究结果表明:多元化会使银行的投资组合变得相似从而更容易引发系统性风险,资产减价出售和银行间拆借关系的存在同样会增加银行系统性风险,因而通过减少投资组合多元化和控制银行拆借比例等措施可以在一定程度上降低系统性风险的发生,这对于系统性风险的监管具有较高的参考价值。

本文引用格式

姚鸿, 王超, 何建敏, 李亮 . 银行投资组合多元化与系统性风险的关系研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019 , 27(2) : 9 -18 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.02.002

Abstract

It has been widely believed that the overall systemic risk instead of the individual risk should be paid more attention in the modern financial system. Meanwhile, the investment portfolios diversification theory which benefits the individual bank in traditional economics is no longer desirable as a result of the systemic risk. Therefore, the relationship between investment portfolios diversification of banks and the systemic risk still needs a further study. In a simplified financial market, the balance sheet is used to describe the connection between banks and assets, then a mathematical model is set up to depict the bankruptcy boundary of banks. The difference and relationship among individual risk, systematic risk, systemic risk with interbank loans, systemic risk with both fire sale and interbank loans are respectively studied based on the mathematical model. Finally, the mathematical model is numerical tested according to actual parameter values in the financial market and the results show that, investment portfolios of different banks will become similar with each other because of diversification which incurs the systemic risk more easily. The existence of fire sale and interbank loans will also increase the systemic risk. Therefore, the systemic risk can be controlled to a certain extent by reducing investment portfolio diversification and interbank loans ratio and this result provides a high reference value for the supervision of systemic risk.

参考文献

[1] 刘孟飞, 王军. 系统性风险约束下的商业银行成本、利润效率比较研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(12):27-34.

[2] 欧阳红兵, 刘晓东. 中国金融机构的系统重要性及系统性风险传染机制分析——基于复杂网络的视角[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(10):30-37.

[3] Beale N, Rand D G, Battey H, et al. Individual versus systemic risk and the regulator's dilemma[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011, 108(31):12647-12652.

[4] Markowitz H. Portfolio selection[J]. The Journal of Finance, 1952, 7(1):77-91.

[5] Wagner W. Diversification at financial institutions and systemic crises[J]. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 2010, 19(3):373-386.

[6] Wagner W. Systemic liquidation risk and the diversity-diversification trade-off[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2011, 66(4):1141-1175.

[7] Maeno Y, Morinaga S, Nishiguchi K, et al. Optimal portfolio for a robust financial system[C]//Proceedings of 2013 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering & Economics, Singapore, April 16-19,2013.

[8] Tasca P, Battiston S, Deghi A. Portfolio diversification and systemic risk in interbank networks[J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2017, 82:96-124.

[9] Caccioli F, Shrestha M, Moore C, et al. Stability analysis of financial contagion due to overlapping portfolios[J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2014, 46:233-245.

[10] 张吟, 朱淑媛, 张瑞,等. 基于投资组合关联的金融系统性风险影响因素研究[J]. 北京师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 52(4):425-429.

[11] Cifuentes R, Ferrucci G, Shin H S. Liquidity risk and contagion[J]. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2005, 3(2-3):556-566.

[12] Eisenberg L, Noe T H. Systemic risk in financial systems[J]. Management Science, 2001, 47(2):236-249.

[13] Feinstein Z. Financial contagion and asset liquidation strategies[J]. Operations Research Letters, 2017, 45(2):109-114.

[14] Greenwood R, Landier A, Thesmar D. Vulnerable banks[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2015, 115(3):471-485.

[15] 方意, 郑子文. 系统性风险在银行间的传染路径研究-基于持有共同资产网络模型[J]. 国际金融研究, 2016, 350(6):61-72.

[16] 童中文. 银行间资产清算顺序优化与风险传染免疫机制[J]. 中国管理科学, 2012, 20(1):51-58.

[17] 邓超, 陈学军. 基于多主体建模分析的银行间网络系统性风险研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(1):67-75.

[18] 隋聪, 谭照林, 王宗尧. 基于网络视角的银行业系统性风险度量方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(5):54-64.

[19] Caccioli F, Farmer J D, Foti N, et al. Overlapping portfolios, contagion, and financial stability[J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2015, 51:50-63.

[20] Aldasoro I, Faia E. Systemic loops and liquidity regulation[J]. Journal of Financial Stability, 2016, 27:1-16.

[21] 吴宜勇, 胡日东, 袁正中. 共同资产持有的网络风险传染与政府救助[J]. 金融论坛, 2017,(8):35-45.

[22] 隋聪, 于洁晶, 宗计川. 银行间债务违约诱发资产减价出售——基于债务与资产关联的风险叠加传染研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2017, 37(11):2753-2764.

[23] May R M, Arinaminpathy N. Systemic risk:The dynamics of model banking systems[J]. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2010, 7(46):823-838.
文章导航

/