主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

中国管理科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5): 44-56.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2024.1506cstr: 32146.14.j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2024.1506

• • 上一篇    下一篇

金融危机的度量:链接宏观价格压力和微观金融机构资本短缺

许海川(), 王晗亮, 周炜星   

  1. 华东理工大学商学院,上海 200237
  • 收稿日期:2024-09-03 修回日期:2025-01-14 出版日期:2026-05-25 发布日期:2026-04-21
  • 通讯作者: 许海川 E-mail:hcxu@ecust.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(71971081)

Measuring Financial Crises: Linking Macroeconomic Price Pressures and Microeconomic Financial Institution Capital Shortfalls

Haichuan Xu(), Hanliang Wang, Weixing Zhou   

  1. School of Business,East China University of Science and Technology,Shanghai 200237,China
  • Received:2024-09-03 Revised:2025-01-14 Online:2026-05-25 Published:2026-04-21
  • Contact: Haichuan Xu E-mail:hcxu@ecust.edu.cn

摘要:

表征金融市场价格压力的金融压力指数和基于金融机构测度的系统性风险指标均被用来作为金融危机的度量,但两者之间的关系尚不清晰。本文选取货币、股票、债券和外汇市场共9个代表性指标构,建宏观金融市场压力指数,同时,基于微观金融机构资本短缺构建系统性风险指标,通过建立国内模型和全球模型,对两者关系进行实证检验。结果证实了微观系统性风险度量能够解释宏观价格压力,即宏观价格压力指数可以看作是微观系统性风险度量的一种涌现表示。此外,以审慎资本金要求标准化的资本短缺能够更好地解释金融市场压力,这反映了金融危机与抛售资产去杠杆来缓解资金缺口的行为密切相关。进一步地,估计了两个具有内在一致性的金融危机指标:金融危机发生概率和资本短缺可承受能力。其中,后者可以被看作系统性风险警戒线,进而以此构建了一个金融危机预警指标。本文的研究对于监管部门建立有效的危机预警机制具有一定的参考价值。

关键词: 金融危机, 金融压力, 资本短缺, 风险预警

Abstract:

The increasing globalization of financial markets has amplified the destructive power and contagion effects of financial crises, posing significant threats to national financial stability and economic development. Regulators face the critical challenge of establishing effective early warning signals. Financial stress indices, which represent price pressure in financial markets, and systemic risk indicators based on financial institution measures are both used as metrics for financial crises, but the relationship between them is unclear.The relationship between macro-level financial market pressures, as represented by FSIs, and micro-level systemic risk, as measured by the capital shortfalls of financial institutions (SRISK) is investigated. Specifically, it examines whether the aggregate capital shortages of individual financial institutions can explain the observed price pressures in the broader financial market. Furthermore, it is explored which form of standardized SRISK (relative to GDP, market value, or prudential capital requirements) provides the most robust explanation for financial market stress, thereby shedding light on the underlying mechanisms linking micro-level vulnerabilities to macro-level crises. Finally, it aims to develop internally consistent indicators for measuring financial crisis probability and systemic risk tolerance, ultimately leading to a practical early warning indicator.To address these questions, a multi-faceted approach is adopted. First, a comprehensive FSI for China is constructed using nine representative indicators from the money, stock, bond, and foreign exchange markets. Second, the SRISK for both Chinese and major global economies is estimated, representing the expected capital shortfall of financial institutions under a systemic event. The SRISK is then standardized in three ways: SRISK/GDP, SRISK/MV, and SRISK/(TA*k). Third, both domestic and global regression models are established to empirically test the relationship between the FSI and the standardized SRISK measures. Fourth, based on the regression results, two internally consistent financial crisis metrics are derived: (1) the probability of a financial crisis, defined as the probability that the FSI exceeds a predefined threshold (mean plus one standard deviation); and (2) SRISK capacity, defined as the maximum tolerable level of SRISK for a given probability of crisis (e.g., 50%). Finally, an early warning indicator is developed by comparing the actual SRISK to the estimated SRISK capacity.The empirical results demonstrate that micro-level systemic risk measures, particularly SRISK standardized by prudential capital requirements (SRISK/(TA*k)), can effectively explain macro-level price pressures in the financial market. The SRISK/(TA*k) variable consistently exhibits the strongest and most significant positive relationship with the FSI across different model specifications, suggesting that financial crises are closely associated with deleveraging behavior through asset fire sales to mitigate capital shortfalls. The estimated probability of a financial crisis in China aligns well with historical periods of heightened systemic risk. The global model tends to capture the impact of external shocks earlier than the domestic model, consistent with the nature of cross-border risk contagion. The analysis of SRISK capacity provides a dynamic measure of the system’s resilience to systemic risk. Valuable insights into the interconnectedness of macro and micro dimensions of financial crises are provided. By demonstrating that macro price pressures can be explained by micro-level capital shortfalls, a critical gap in the literature is bridged. The finding that SRISK standardized by prudential capital requirements is the most informative indicator highlights the importance of regulatory capital standards in mitigating systemic risk. The proposed early warning indicator, based on the ratio of SRISK to SRISK capacity, offers a practical tool for regulators to monitor systemic risk and implement timely interventions. The results also highlight the growing systemic importance of Chinese financial institutions in the global context. Overall, it contributes to a deeper understanding of financial crisis dynamics and provides valuable guidance for policymakers seeking to enhance financial stability.

Key words: financial crisis, financial stress, capital shortfalls, early-warning

中图分类号: