对偶犹豫非均衡语言群决策模型及其在供应商韧性评价中的应用研究

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2022.1196

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

中国制造业企业纵深国际化战略遭遇的环境变动性凸显了供应商韧性能力综合评价在构建稳健供应链网络过程中极为重要的作用。鉴于此，本文从供应商韧性能力综合评价问题的复杂性特征出发，研究对偶犹豫非均衡语言信息环境下的群决策模型。定义了更具实际适应性的一类新型信息形式：对偶犹豫非均衡语言术语集；引入最小公倍数犹豫模糊元拓展法开发了相应关联系数测度方法，以避免基于主观态度假设而带来的潜在信息扭曲，进一步研究了基于关联系数的专家权重确定模型；最后，针对实际供应商韧性能力综合评价中两类典型问题，即存在标杆供应商、决策群体对评价指标的相对重要性偏好存在差异，分别构建了群决策模型，并通过案例与数值分析验证本文方法的实际适应性。

关键词: 对偶犹豫非均衡语言术语集, 关联系数, 专家权重, 供应商韧性评价

Abstract:

To answer the advocation of “Going global” strategy by China’s central government， Chinese manufacturing companies have been increasingly and deeply participating global competition in various international markets. However， continuously emerging environmental dynamic changes and risks， such as those from unfair competition， regional politics， pandemics and etc.， have been requiring to build robust supply networks for adaptation. The practical requirements thus also have been highlighting the crucial role of comprehensively evaluating resilience capability in supplier selection， which accentuates to simultaneously and comprehensively consider economic， environmental and social indicators as well as resilience ones.According to extant literatures， the focal problems of comprehensive evaluation of suppliers’ resilience capability exhibit multi-faceted complex characteristics， such as holding semi-structured or low-structured problem definitions， involving participation of multiple stakeholders in decision-making processes， incurring inaccurate assessments and decision hesitancy among decision makers. To this end， with acknowledgement of the multi-faceted complex characteristics above-mentioned， it focuses on investigating effective group decision making approaches for comprehensive evaluation of suppliers’ resilience capability by contributing to introducing in this paper：（1） an effective hybrid expression tool for eliciting decision-makers’ assessments more objectively and comprehensively；（2） fuzzy information measures for avoiding potential information distortion in comparison to widely-accepted traditional ones；（3） rational methods for objectively obtaining unknown weighting vectors；（4） processual modelling methodologies for group decision making to accommodate typical situations of suppliers’ resilience capability evaluation.To solve these problems listed above， firstly， a novel expression tool called as dual hesitant unbalanced linguistic term set （DHULTS） has been defined. Secondly， to avoid potential information distortion that is usually brought about by traditional hesitant element extension methods， a least common multiple （LCM） based extension mechanism has been introduced to develop correlation coefficient-oriented measure for DHULTS， by use of which a weighting method for obtaining unknown experts’ weights has further been established. Thirdly， grounded on the above methods， corresponding group decision making approaches have been constructed with regard to two specific situations in practices：（i） target supplier（s） for benchmarking could be derived in advance；（ii） decision making units do have different opinions on prioritization among evaluative attributes. Finally， case application and numerical studies have then been conducted to verify effectiveness and superiority of our approaches.

Key words: dual hesitant unbalanced linguistic term set, correlation coefficient, weighting model, supplier’s resilience capability evaluation

中图分类号:

C934

戚筱雯,梁昌勇,张俊岭. 对偶犹豫非均衡语言群决策模型及其在供应商韧性评价中的应用研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(12): 108-117.

Xiaowen Qi,Changyong Liang,Junling Zhang. Dual Hesitant Unbalanced Linguistic Group Decision Approaches with Application to Evaluating Suppliers' Resilience Capability[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(12): 108-117.

参考文献 36

1	Gao S Y， Simchi D， Teo C P， et al. Disruption risk mitigation in supply chains： The risk exposure index revisited［J］. Operations Research，2019，67（3）：831-852.
2	Melnyk S， Closs D J， Griffis S， et al. Understanding supply chain resilience［J］. Supply Chain Management Review， 2014， 18（1）：34-41.
3	Li C C， Dong Y C， Liang H M， et al. Data-driven method to learning personalized individual semantics to support linguistic multi-attribute decision making［J］. Omega， 2022， 111：102642.
4	彭友，刘晓鹤，孙健博. 区间直觉模糊数环境下基于犹豫度和相关系数的多属性群决策模型研究［J］. 中国管理科学， 2021， 29（8）： 229-240.
	Peng Y， Liu X H， Sun J B. Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making approach based on hesitancy degrees and correlation coefficient［J］.Chinese Journal of Management Science， 2021， 29（8）： 229-240.
5	Ding Q Y， Wang Y M， Goh M， et al. A hesitant fuzzy linguistic bidirectional projection-regret decision making model［J］. Computers & Industrial Engineering， 2022， 169：108197.
6	Zhai Y L， Xu Z S. Managing individual evaluator’s personalized semantic environment of linguistic term with improved vector expression in multi-granularity linguistic group decision making［J］. Applied Soft Computing， 2020， 92：106334.
7	王磊，赵臣啸，薛惠锋，等. 基于犹豫模糊语言的专家综合集成研讨方法［J］. 系统工程理论与实践， 2021， 41（8）：2157-2168.
	Wang L， Zhao C X， Xue H F， et al. The expert synthesis and integration research method based on hesitant fuzzy language［J］. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice， 2021， 41（8）：2157-2168.
8	刘俊，罗世华. 面向区域绿色修复水平评价的概率犹豫Fermatean模糊拓展MULTIMOORA方法［J］. 控制与决策， 2022， 37（10）：2685-2695.
	Liu J， Luo S H. Probabilistic hesitant fermatean fuzzy extension multimoora method for evaluation of regional green restoration level［J］. Control and Decision， 2022， 37（10）：2685-2695.
9	Ni Y， Zhao H， Xu Z S， et al. Multiple attribute decision-making method based on projection model for dual hesitant fuzzy set［J］. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making， 2022， 21（2）：263-289.
10	Torra V. Hesitant fuzzy sets［J］. International Journal of Intelligent Systems， 2010， 25（6）：529-539.
11	Zhu B， Xu Z S， Xia M M. Dual hesitant fuzzy sets［J］. Journal of Applied Mathematics， 2012， 5：1-13.
12	Zadeh L A. The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-I［J］. Information Sciences， 1975， 8（3）：199-249.
13	Xu Z S. An approach based on the uncertain LOWG and induced uncertain LOWG operators to group decision making with uncertain multiplicative linguistic preference relations［J］. Decision Support Systems， 2006， 41（2）：488-499.
14	Rodríguez R M， Martínez L， Herrera F. Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making［J］. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems， 2012， 20（1）：109-119.
15	Zhang R C， Li Z M， Liao H C. Multiple-attribute decision-making method based on the correlation coefficient between dual hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets［J］. Knowledge-Based Systems， 2018， 159：186-192.
16	Wang X K， Wang Y T， Zhang H Y， et al. An asymmetric trapezoidal cloud-based linguistic group decision-making method under unbalanced linguistic distribution assessments［J］. Computers & Industrial Engineering， 2021， 160：107457.
17	Herrera-Viedma E， López-Herrera A G. A model of an information retrieval system with unbalanced fuzzy linguistic information［J］. International Journal of Intelligent Systems， 2007， 22（11）：1197-1214.
18	Dong Y C， Li C C， Herrera F. Connecting the linguistic hierarchy and the numerical scale for the 2-tuple linguistic model and its use to deal with hesitant unbalanced linguistic information［J］. Information Sciences， 2016， 368：259-278.
19	Liao H C， Qin R， Gao C Y， et al. Score-HeDLiSF： A score function of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set based on hesitant degrees and linguistic scale functions： An application to unbalanced hesitant fuzzy linguistic multimoora［J］. Information Fusion， 2019， 48：39-54.
20	Liu P D， Rong L L. Multiple attribute group decision-making approach based on multi-granular unbalanced hesitant fuzzy linguistic information［J］. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems， 2020， 22（2）：604-618.
21	Wang Z C， Ran Y， Chen Y F， et al. Group risk assessment in failure mode and effects analysis using a hybrid probabilistic hesitant fuzzy linguistic MCDM method［J］. Expert Systems with Applications， 2022， 188：116013.
22	Tang M， Wang T D， Peng D H. An improved Taguchi multi-criteria decision-making method based on the hesitant fuzzy correlation coefficient and its application in quality evaluation［J］. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing， 2021， 12（8）：8241-8254.
23	Liao H C， Gou X J， Xu Z S， et al. Hesitancy degree-based correlation measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and their applications in multiple criteria decision making［J］. Information Sciences， 2020， 508：275-292.
24	Suo C F， Li Y M， Li Z H. A series of information measures of hesitant fuzzy soft sets and their application in decision making［J］. Soft Computing， 2021， 25（6）：4771-4784.
25	Ye J. Multiple-attribute decision-making method using similarity measures of single-valued neutrosophic hesitant fuzzy sets based on least common multiple cardinality［J］. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems， 2018， 34（6）：4203-4211.
26	Cui W H， Ye J. Multiple-attribute decision-making method using similarity measures of hesitant linguistic neutrosophic numbers regarding least common multiple cardinality［J］. Symmetry， 2018， 10（8）：1-11.
27	Liao H C， Gou X J， Xu Z S， et al. Hesitancy degree-based correlation measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and their applications in multiple criteria decision making［J］. Information Sciences， 2020， 508：275-292.
28	Dong Y C， Li C C， Herrera F. An optimization-based approach to adjusting unbalanced linguistic preference relations to obtain a required consistency level［J］. Information Sciences， 2015， 292：27-38.
29	Dong Y C， Li C C， Herrera F. Connecting the numerical scale model to the unbalanced linguistic term sets［J］. IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems， 2014，7：455-462.
30	Rezaei J. Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method［J］. Omega， 2015， 53：49-57.
31	Valipour P S， Safaei G A， Fallah L H. Resilient supplier selection and segmentation in grey environment［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production， 2019， 207：1123-1137.
32	Hosseini S， Morshedlou N， Ivanov D， et al. Resilient supplier selection and optimal order allocation under disruption risks［J］. International Journal of Production Economics， 2019， 213：124-137.
33	Amindoust A. A resilient-sustainable based supplier selection model using a hybrid intelligent method［J］. Computers & Industrial Engineering， 2018， 126：122-135.
34	Fallahpour A， Nayeri S， Sheikhalishahi M， et al. A hyper-hybrid fuzzy decision-making framework for the sustainable-resilient supplier selection problem： A case study of malaysian palm oil industry［J］. Environmental Science and Pollution Research， 2021，1：1-21.
35	Mohammed A， Harris I， Soroka A， et al. Gresilient supplier assessment and order allocation planning［J］. Annals of Operations Research， 2021， 296（1）：335-362.
36	Xie W Y， Xu Z S， Ren Z L， et al. The probe for the weighted dual probabilistic linguistic correlation coefficient to invest an artificial intelligence project［J］. Soft Computing， 2020， 24（20）：15389-15408.

[1]	钱丽丽, 刘思峰, 邓桂丰. 考虑后悔规避的灰色群体偏离靶心度决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(6): 193-200.
[2]	罗党, 刘思峰. 灰色关联决策方法研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2005, (1): 101-106.