Internet-based online recyclers are a useful complement to existing e-waste recycling systems. Considering the differences in the collection cost of dual-channel and remanufacturable ratio of recycling products, the Stackelberg pricing model of manufacturer, retailer and online recycler is established. In this paper, the optimal collection price and profits of dual channel are determined separately under centralized and decentralized decision making. The impact of remanufacturable ratio of recycling products, collection competition coefficient, the consumer sensitivity of collection price and other factors on the collection prices, quantities and profits through numerical simulation is also analysed. Finally, the benefit cost sharing model is used to coordinate the subjects of the supply chain, and numerical examples are used to verify the efficiency of the coordination contract. The results show that:The profit of the whole closed-loop supply chain under the centralized decision making is the largest, whereas double marginalization results in loss of efficiency under decentralized decision making. Remanufacturable ratio of recycling products, collection competition coefficient, the consumer sensitivity of collection price are related to the collection amount of discarded product and profits of supply chain. To design a benefit cost sharing coordination contract can effectively improve the efficiency of closed-loop supply chain and increase profits of each party, and encourage manufacturer, retailer and online recycler to implement the contract.
ZHU Xiao-dong, WU Bing-bing, WANG Zhe
. Closed-loop Supply Chain Pricing Strategy and Coordination Mechanism under the Difference of Dual-channel Recycling Cost[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017
, 25(12)
: 188
-196
.
DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2017.12.020
[1] Yenipazarli A. Managing new and remanufactured products to mitigate environmental damage under emissions regulation[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2016, 249(1):117-130.
[2] Savaskan R C, Bhattacharya S, Van Wassenhove L N. Closed-loop supply chain models with product remanufacturing[J]. Management Science, 2004, 50(2):239-252.
[3] 陈军, 田大钢. 闭环供应链模型下的产品回收模式选择[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017,25(1):88-97.
[4] 赵敬华, 林杰. 不同补贴对象下的闭环供应链定价模型[J]. 管理工程学报, 2017,31(1):85-92.
[5] 许民利, 聂晓哲, 简惠云. 不同风险偏好下双渠道供应链定价决策[J]. 控制与决策, 2016, 31(1):91-98.
[6] 曹晓刚, 郑本荣, 闻卉. 基于DFD的再制造系统生产及定价联合决策研究[J]. 管理工程学报, 2016, 30(1):117-123.
[7] Luo Zheng, Chen Xu, Chen Jing, et al. Optimal pricing policies for differentiated brands under different supply chain power structures[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2017, 259(2):437-451.
[8] Yoo S H, Kim B C. Joint pricing of new and refurbished items:A comparison of closed-loop supply chain models[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2016, 182:132-143.
[9] Wei Jie, Govindan K, Li Yongjian, et al. Pricing and collecting decisions in a closed-loop supply chain with symmetric and asymmetric information[J]. Computers & Operations Research, 2015, 54:257-265.
[10] Gan S S, Pujawan I N, Widodo B. Pricing decision for new and remanufactured product in a closed-loop supply chain with separate sales-channel[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2017,160:120-132.
[11] Abbey J D, Blackburn J D, Guide Jr.V D R. Optimal pricing for new and remanufactured products[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2015, 36:130-146.
[12] Liu Huihui, Lei Ming, Deng Honghui, et al. A dual channel, quality-based price competition model for the WEEE recycling market with government subsidy[J]. Omega, 2016, 59:290-302.
[13] Zhou Wenhui, Zheng Yanfang, Huang Weixiang. Competitive advantage of qualified WEEE recyclers through EPR legislation[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2017, 257(2):641-655.
[14] Esenduran G, Atasu A, Van Wassenhove L N. Valuable e-waste:Implications for extended producer responsibility[R]. Research Paper No.26,Georgia Tech Scheller College of Business, 2015.
[15] Zheng Y F, Zhou W H, Zheng Z B, et al. The competition of recyclers under the take back legislation[C]//Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Computer Information Systems and Industrial Applications,Bangkok,Thailand,June:28-29,2015.
[16] Li Jian, Wang Zhen, Jiang Bao, et al. Coordination strategies in a three-echelon reverse supply chain for economic and social benefit[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2017,49:599-611.
[17] He Yi, Xu Qingyun, Xu Bing, et al. Supply chain coordination in quality improvement with reference effects[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2016, 67(9):1158-1168.
[18] 张汉江, 余华英, 李聪颖. 闭环供应链上的回收激励契约设计与政府补贴再制造政策的优化[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(8):71-78.
[19] 江世英, 李随成. 考虑产品绿色度的绿色供应链博弈模型及收益共享契约[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(6):169-176.
[20] Liu Zhi, Tang Juan, Li Bangyi, et al. Trade-off between remanufacturing and recycling of WEEE and the environmental implication under the Chinese Fund Policy[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 167:97-109.
[21] Zhu X,Wang Z,Wang Y,Li B.Incentive Policy Options for Product Remanfacturing:Subsidizing Donations or Resales?[J].International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,2017,14(12):1496-1511.
