主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
Articles

Research on the Model of Corporate's Procurement Management with the Involvement of 3PL

Expand
  • 1. School of Business Planning, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, China;
    2. School of Economics and Business Administration, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China

Received date: 2015-04-26

  Revised date: 2016-02-03

  Online published: 2017-05-27

Abstract

With the development of modern logistics, enterprises usually outsource some of their business such as procurement to the third-party logistics service provider. They make the third-party logistics service provider share the risk of uncertainty with them, and thus they can devote themselves to developing their own core business. This has become a approach and trend for the enterprise to participate in the fierce market competition. In addition, during the procurement, as the product cycle is shortened, many enterprises are increasingly tending to use the option contract to avoid the procurement risk, and it makes the option contract more and more widely applied in the supply chain. Therefore, considering the fact that the third-party logistics (3PL) participates in managing the supply chain of the enterprise is of greater realistic and theoretical significance. However, the existing literatures seldom consider the problem of 3PL jointly deciding the procurement quantity and service cost under the abovementioned assumption. On the basis of this point, in this paper, the model for a 3PL is explored to apply the option contract to manage the procurement and the model for a supplier to manage the procurement when a supplier and a 3PL form a supply chain and build the random demand respectively, and the game theory is applied to solve the equilibrium solution for the supplier and 3PL under the abovementioned conditions. Research has shown that, only under certain conditions can 3PL-managed procurement improve the profit for the retailer, 3PL and supply chain system, and only when the risk is high can the retailer own the first-mover advantage. Besides, when 3PL gives a relatively small compensation proportion to the retailer, the retailer will choose to manage the procurement by itself and be subject to the 3PL-oriented decision. As the profit of the 3PL is higher than that of the retailer-oriented decision at this time, the 3Pl will accept this strategy. The conclusion from this paper will enrich the literatures of 3PL research and be of some guiding significance to the practical operation of the retailer and 3PL.

Cite this article

ZHOU Ji-xiang, WANG Yong . Research on the Model of Corporate's Procurement Management with the Involvement of 3PL[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017 , 25(3) : 121 -129 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2017.03.014

References

[1] Sink H L, Langley Jr C J, Gibson B J. Buyer observations of the US third-party logistics market[J]. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 1996, 26(3):38-46.

[2] Rajesh R, Pugazhendhi S, Ganesh K, et al. Influence of 3PL service offerings on client performance in India[J]. Transportation Research Part E:Logistics and Transportation Review, 2011, 47(2):149-165.

[3] Sohail M S, Sohal A S. The use of third party logistics services:A Malaysian perspective[J]. Technovation, 2003, 23(5):401-408.

[4] Lieb R C, Randall H L. 1997 CEO perspectives on the current status and future prospects of the third party logistics industry in the United States[J]. Transportation Journal, 1999,38(3):28-41.

[5] 易余胤, 袁江. 渠道冲突环境下的闭环供应链协调定价模型[J]. 管理科学学报, 2012, 15(1):54-65.

[6] Lim Y F, Wang Yunzeng, Wu Yue. Consignment contracts with revenue sharing for a capacitated retailer and multiple manufacturers[J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2015, 17(4):527-537.

[7] He Yuhong, Yin Shuya. Joint selling of complementary components under brand and retail competition[J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2015,17(4):470-479.

[8] Ray P, Jenamani M. Mean-variance analysis of sourcing decision under disruption risk[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2016, 250(2):679-689.

[9] Kouvelis P, Shao Wenhua. Supply chain contract design under financial constraints and bankruptcy costs[J]. Management Science, 62(8):2341-2357.

[10] Hua Guowei, Wang Shuoyang, Cheng T C E. Price and lead time decisions in dual-channel supply chains[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 205(1):113-126.

[11] Dan Bin, Xu Guangye, Liu Can. Pricing policies in a dual-channel supply chain with retail services[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2012, 139(1):312-320.

[12] 范小军, 刘艳. 制造商引入在线渠道的双渠道价格与服务竞争策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016,24(7):143-148.

[13] 王勇, 孙海雷, 陈晓旭. 基于数量折扣的改良品供应链协调策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014,22(4):51-57.

[14] 王丽颖, 巩天啸, 陈丽华, 等. 二级市场季节性商品的订购和销售决策[J]. 管理科学学报, 2014,17(5):35-42.

[15] 王文利, 骆建文. 交易信用与资金约束下两阶段零售商订货策略[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2014, 34(2):304-312.

[16] 徐兵, 熊志建. 基于顾客策略行为和缺货损失的供应链定价与订购决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(5):48-55.

[17] 张伟, 周根贵. 一次提前订购下生鲜农产品的最优订货[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(11):138-144.

[18] 丁平, 付超, 肖明, 等. 基于不对称需求信息的供应链最小定购量决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(6):99-106.

[19] 曹兵兵, 樊治平, 张胡伟. 考虑零售商失望规避与欣喜寻求的定价与订货联合决策[J]. 中国管理科学,2016,24(7):82-91.

[20] 于辉, 王亚文. 供应链金融视角下利率市场化的鲁棒分析模型[J]. 中国管理科学,2016,24(2):19-26.

[21] 王宗润, 马振, 周艳菊. 核心企业回购担保下的保兑仓融资决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016,24(11):162-169.

[22] 陈晓旭, 王勇, 于海龙. 3PL参与的时变需求变质品三级供应链模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(1):65-73.

[23] 冯颖, 余云龙, 张炎治, 等. TPL服务商参与决策的生鲜农产品三级供应链协调机制[J]. 管理工程学报, 2015, 29(4):213-221.

[24] 王勇, 胡飞飞, 言小明. 考虑3PL决策的三级供应链定价和订购决策[J]. 系统工程学报, 2014, 29(3):353-361.

[25] Chen Xiangfeng, Cai G. Joint logistics and financial services by a 3PL firm[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2011, 2014(3):579-587.

[26] 陈祥锋, 朱道立. 资金约束供应链中物流提供商的系统价值研究[J]. 系统工程学报, 2008, 23(6):666-673.

[27] Belavina E, Girotra K. The relational advantages of intermediation[J]. Management Science, 2012, 58(9):1614-1631.

[28] Adida E, Bakshi N, Demiguel V. Supply chain intermediation when retailers lead[J]. Working Paper, London Business School, 2012.

[29] Yang Zhibin, Babich V. Does a procurement service provider generate value for the buyer through information about supply risks?[J]. Management Science, 2014, 61(5):979-998.

[30] 叶青. 多部件采购外包的两阶段均衡投标策略[J]. 管理工程学报, 2012, 26(3):22-27.

[31] 王勇, 胡飞飞. 随机需求下企业采购外包的风险与博弈分析[J]. 管理工程学报, 2013, 27(2):115-122.

[32] Mills E S. Uncertainty and price theory[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1959, 73(1):116-130.

[33] Zabel E. Monopoly and unvertainty[J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 1970, 37(2):205-219.

[34] Liu C L, Lyons A C. An analysis of third-party logistics performance and service provision[J]. Transportation Research Part E, 2011, 47(4):547-570.
Outlines

/