主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
Articles

Incentive Contract Design and Optimization Of Government Subsidies Policy in the Closed-loop Supply Chain

Expand
  • College of Economics and Trade, Hunan University, Changsha 410079, China

Received date: 2013-11-17

  Revised date: 2014-06-01

  Online published: 2016-08-24

Abstract

Recycling and remanufacturing of wasted electrical and electronic products has positive external economic characteristics, often leading to insufficient motivation for enterprises. For the purpose of saving resources and protecting the environment, government provides subsidies to re-manufacturers to encourage them to recycle and remanufacture. New products and remanufactured products generally have certain differences in perceived value, and may further affect the manufacturing cost advantages play. The government is described as a decision-maker and a Stackelberg Game, in which the government acted as a leader, manufacturer and re-manufacturer are followers, recycler is the re-manufacturer's follower, is established. An optimal incentive contract between the re-manufacturer and recycler is nested based on the Principal-agent analysis. The optimal decision of the government and manufacturers, re-manufacturers is obtained. Optimal government subsidies will effectively improve the competitive advantage of remanufactured products and promot the development of remanufacturing industry, while effectively reduce the cost of burying the waste products. The optimal incentive mechanism design can effectively improve the efficiency of recycling and remanufacturing of waste. It is found that the degree of substitution of new products and remanufactured products indirectly influence government decisions and the government should adjust the subsidy according to the proportion of remanufacturing. The impact of remanufactured comparative cost advantage on closed-loop supply chain decisions is gotten by numerical analysis. The results can be used as reference for government policy formulation and company decision making.

Cite this article

ZHANG Han-jiang, YU Hua-ying, LI Cong-ying . Incentive Contract Design and Optimization Of Government Subsidies Policy in the Closed-loop Supply Chain[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2016 , 24(8) : 71 -78 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2016.08.009

References

[1] Savaska R C,Van Wassenhove L N.Reverse channel design:The case of competing retailers[J]. Management Science, 2006, 52(1) :1-14.

[2] Ferguson M,Toktay L B.The effect of competition on recovery strategies[J]. Product and Operations Management,2006,15(3):351-368.

[3] 肖迪,黄培清.基于不对称信息的闭环供应链激励机制[J]. 工业工程与管理,2007,12(4):11-14.

[4] 黄祖庆,易荣华,达庆利.第三方负责回收的再制造闭环供应链决策结构的效率分析[J]. 中国管理科学,2008,16(3):73-77.

[5] Ferrer G.,Swaminathan J M. Managing new and differentiated remanufactured products[J]. European Journal of Operation Research, 2010, 203(2): 370-379.

[6] 孙浩,达庆利.基于产品差异的再制造闭环供应链定价与协调研究[J]. 管理学报,2010,7(5):733-738.

[7] 曹俊,熊中楷,刘莉莎.闭环供应链中新件制造商和再制造商的价格及质量水平竞争[J]. 中国管理科学,2010,18(5) :82-90.

[8] 颜荣芳,程永宏,王彩霞.再制造闭环供应链最优差别定价模型[J]. 中国管理科学,2013,21(1):90-97.

[9] 张克勇,吴燕,侯世旺.具公平关切零售商的闭环供应链差别定价策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学,2014,22(3):51-58.

[10] Mitra S, Webster S.Competition in remanufacturing and the effects of government subsidies[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2008, 111(2): 287-298.

[11] Aksen D, Aras N, Karaarslan A G.Design and analysis of government subsidized collection systems for incentive-dependent returns[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2009, 119(2):308-327.

[12] 王文宾,达庆利. 奖惩机制下电子类产品制造商回收再制造决策模型[J]. 中国管理科学,2008,16(5):57-63.

[13] 王文宾,达庆利.考虑政府引导的电子类产品逆向供应链奖惩机制设计[J]. 中国管理科学,2010,18(2):62-67.

[14] 王文宾,达庆利.奖惩机制下闭环供应链的决策与协调[J]. 中国管理科学,2011,19(1):36-41.

[15] 贡文伟,李虎,梅强. 政府引导下的逆向供应链契约设计[J]. 运筹与管理,2012,21(3):242-249.

[16] 王文宾,达庆利.奖惩机制下具竞争制造商的废旧产品回收决策模型[J]. 中国管理科学,2013,21(5):50-56.

[17] 余福茂,钟永光,沈祖志.考虑政府引导激励的电子废弃物回收处理决策模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学,2014,22(5):131-137.
Outlines

/