The study of the generation and evolution of emergent collective event has become an important topic of social management. The computational social science approach provides a new method to analyze this issue deeply. By reviewing the previous research and empirical analysis of several cases, the global factors of emergent collective events are suggested. They are the level of public trust in the government, interest demand or social problem solving mechanism and the social common brief. When these global factors reached a certain level, they form the important conditions for emergent collective event. Under certain global conditions, the formation of emergent collective event depends deeply on the individual interactions through the social network. Based on the model of computational sociology, the generation and evolution of emergent collective event on the artificial social network is simulated and the effects of global factors and individual interactions are analyzed. The result of the simulation demonstrated the critical value of some endogenous factors when other factors are constant. A necessary fundamental model is provided for the further study on the generation and evolution of emergent collective event.
LUO Zhi, YANG Guan-qiong
. The Effects of Global Factors and Individual Interactions on the Generation and Evolution of Emergent Collective Event[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015
, 23(3)
: 159
-167
.
DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.03.019
[1] 于建嵘.社会泄愤事件中群体心理研究——对"瓮安事件"发生机制的一种解释[J].北京行政学院学报,2009,(1):1-5.
[2] 于建嵘.我国现阶段农村群体性事件的主要原因[J].中国农村观察,2003,(6):75-78.
[3] 肖文涛.治理群体性事件与加强基层政府应对能力建设[J].中国行政管理,2009,(6):118-123.
[4] 赵守东.群体性事件的体制性症结及解决思路[J].理论探讨,2007,(2):17-18.
[5] 唐斌.群体性事件的网络传播与政府干预分析[J].河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2009,(6):42-46.
[6] 陈华森.群体性事件的发生机制及其消减途径探析——一个政治文化的分析视角[J].探索,2010,(6):96-100.
[7] 陈潭,黄金.群体性事件多种原因的理论阐释[J].政治学研究,2009,(6):54-61.
[8] 刘德海. 信息交流在群体性突发事件处理中作用的博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学,2005,13(3):95-102.
[9] 刘德海.群体性突发事件中政府机会主义行为的演化博弈分析[J].中国管理科学,2010,18(1):175-183.
[10] Smelser N J. Theory of collective behavior[M]. New York: The Free Press, 1962.
[11] Huang C, Sun C, Hsieh J, et al. Simulating SARS: Small-world epidemiological modeling and public health policy assessments[J]. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 2004, 7(4): 2.
[12] Grabowski A, Kosinski R A. Ising-based model of opinion formation in a complex network of interpersonal interactions[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2006, 361(2): 651-664.
[13] Stocker R, Green D, Newth D. Consensus and cohesion in simulated social networks[J]. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 2001, 4(4):5.
[14] Stocker R, Cornforth D, Bossomaier T R J. Network structures and agreement in social network simulations[J]. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 2002, 5(4): 1-18.
[15] Suo Shuguang, Chen Yu. The dynamics of public opinion in complex networks[J]. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 2008, 11(4): 2.
[16] 赵正龙,陈忠,孙武军,等.具有差异化选择特征的复杂社会网络扩散研究[J].管理科学学报,2010,13(3):38-49.
[17] 刘德海,王维国. 维权型群体性突发事件社会网络结构与策略的协同演化机制[J]. 中国管理科学,2012,20(3):185-192.
[18] 周感华.群体性事件心理动因和心理机制探析[J]. 北京行政学院学报,2011,(6):1-5.
[19] 梅珍生,胡静.群体性事件形成的心理机制分析[J]. 社会心理科学,2006,21(6):18-25.
[20] 王春福.韩国公共政策利益表达机制及其启示[J].管理世界,2007,(11):156-157.
[21] Durkheim E. The rules of sociological method[M]. New York: The Free Press, 1950.
[22] Kuran T. Sparks and prairie fires: A theory of unanticipated political revolution[J]. Public Choice, 1988, 61(1): 41-74.
[23] 曹英,群体性事件中的信息传播流程、节点与心理接受机制[J]. 河南社会科学,2009,17(1):133-138.
[24] Hamill L, Gilbert N. Social circles: A simple structure for agent-based social network models[J]. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 2009, 12(3): 3.
[25] Barabasi A L, Albert R. Emergence of scaling in random networks[J]. Science, 1999, 286(5439): 509-512.
[26] Holme P, Kim B J. Growing scale-free networks with tunable clustering[J]. Physical Review E, 2002, 65(2): 1-4.