增长期权的执行、创造与资产风险溢价——企业生命周期的视角

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2018.10.001

Abstract

Abstract: The activities of the exercising and creating of growth options jointly drive the evolution of firm lifecycle, and the relative power of the dynamic effects of two activities finally determines the change trend of the risk premium of total assets along with firm lifecycle. Different from the existing literature separately focusing on the roles of the exercising and the creating of growth options, the purpose of this paper is to theoretically demonstrate the combined roles of exercising and creating of growth options in determining the change of risk premium. Two main contributions are made in this paper. First, a unified explanation is provided for the roles of investments including capital expenditure, R&D or M&A in predicting asset returns. Second, an insightfully theoretical implication is shown that the dynamics of growth options can determine the development path of a firm over its lifecycle, and an explanation is given for the existing finding about U-shaped pattern of risk premium over firm lifecycle.
real option model is firstly developed to evaluate a representative firm that will grow into maturity as the exercising of its endowed growth options and can simultaneously create new growth options in both young and mature stages of its lifecycle. Secondly, using the technique of pricing kernel, the dynamic effects of the exercising and creating of growth options on the risk premium for young and mature firms are demonstrated and compared, respectively. Finally, how the combined roles of the gradual exercising of endowed growth options and the continuous creating of new growth options determine the change trend of risk premium over firm lifecycle is analyzed.
Consistent with empirical evidence on the relation between investment and expected stock return, it is found that the exercising of growth options decreases risk premium, while the creating of growth options increases risk premium. A further finding is that the negative effect of the exercising of growth options on risk premium is more pronounced for young firms, while the positive effect of the creating of growth options is more pronounced for mature firms. By combining the effects of two activities, the numerical illustration indicates that the gradual exercising of growth options leads to a downward trend of risk premium, but there may exist a U-shaped change of risk premium for firms being able to create continuously new growth options in the mature stage of their lifecycle.

Key words: firm lifecycle, growth options, option exercise, option creation, risk premium

CLC Number:

F830.91

LI Zhun, LI Qiang, ZENG Yong. The Exercise and Creation of Growth Options and Risk Premium: From the Perspective of Firm Lifecycle[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(10): 1-9.

References

[1] Pástor L, Veronesi P. Stock valuation and learning about pro? tability[J]. Journal of Finance, 2003, 58(5):1749-1790.

[2] DeAngelo H, DeAngelo L, Stulz R M. Dividend policy and the earned/contributed capital mix:A test of the life-cycle theory[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2006, 81(2):227-254.

[3] Loderer C, Stulz R, Waelchli U. Firm rigidities and the decline in growth opportunities[J]. Management Science, 2016, 63(9):3000-3020.

[4] Faff R, Kwof W C, Podolski E J, et al. Do corporate policies follow a life-cycle?[J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2016, 69:95-107.

[5] Berk J B, Green R C, Naik V. Optimal investment, growth options, and security returns[J]. Journal of Finance, 1999, 54(5):1513-1607.

[6] Gomes J, Kogan L, Zhang Lu. Equilibrium cross section of returns[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 2003, 111(4):693-732.

[7] Carlson M, Fisher A, Giammarino R. Corporate investment and asset price dynamics:Implications for the cross-section of returns[J]. Journal of Finance, 2004, 59(6):2577-2603.

[8] Carlson M, Fisher A, Giammarino R. SEO risk dynamics[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 2010, 23(11):4026-4077.

[9] Anderson C W, Garcia-Feijóo L. Empirical evidence on capital investment, growth options, and security returns[J]. Journal of Finance, 2006, 61(1):171-194.

[10] 周铭山, 叶建华. 资本支出、公司规模与账面市值比效应——基于A股上市公司的研究[J]. 投资研究, 2012, 31(6):118-132.

[11] Cooper I, Priestley R. Real investment and risk dynamics[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2011, 101(1):182-205.

[12] 林祺. 资本市场效率与资产增长异象——最优投资效应假说VS.错误定价假说[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2016, 15(2):767-796.

[13] 姚靠华, 唐家财, 蒋艳辉. 研发投入、研发项目进展与股价波动——基于创业板上市高新技术企业的实证研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2013, 21(S1):205-213.

[14] Kumar P, Li Dongmei. Capital investment, innovative capacity, and stock returns[J]. Journal of Finance, 2016, 71(5):2059-2094.

[15] Simeth M, Cincera M. Corporate science, innovation, and firm value[J]. Management Science, 2016, 62(7):1970-1981.

[16] 李逸, 买忆嫒. 新创企业的品牌资产提升:广告投入还是研发投入[J]. 管理工程学报, 2016, 30(3):81-89.

[17] Phillips G M, Zhdanov A. R&D and the incentives from merger and acquisition activity[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 2013, 26(1):34-78.

[18] Gu Lifeng. Product market competition, R&D investment, and stock returns[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2016, 119(2):441-455.

[19] 李强, 纪佳君, 曾勇. R&D投资、一般性资本支出与股票收益:增长期权的视角[J]. 管理工程学报, 2018, 32(1):196-203.

[20] 杨飞. 并购:增长期权创造与股票预期收益[D]. 四川:电子科技大学金融学硕士学位论文, 2016.

[21] Hasan M M, Hossain M, Cheung A, et al. Corporate life cycle and cost of equity capital[J]. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 2015, 11(1):46-60.

[22] Easley D, O'Hara M. Information and the cost of capital[J]. Journal of Finance, 2004, 59(4):1553-1583.

[23] Armstrong C S, Core J E, Taylor D J, et al. When does information asymmetry affect the cost of capital?[J]. Journal of Accounting Research, 2011, 49(1):1-40.

[24] Gomes J F, Schmid L. Levered returns[J]. Journal of Finance, 2010, 65(2):467-494.

[25] Dixit A K, Pindyck R S. Investment under uncertainty[M]. Princeton, New Jersey:Princeton University Press, 1994.

[26] Cochrane J H. Asset pricing[M]. Princeton, New Jersey:Princeton University Press, 2001.

[27] Li Dongmei. Financial constraints, R&D investment, and stock returns[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 2011, 24(9):2974-3007.

[28] Grullon G, Michaely R, Swaminathan B. Are dividend changes a sign of firm maturity?[J]. Journal of Business, 2002, 75(3):387-423.

[29] Dickinson V. Cash flow patterns as a proxy for firm life cycle[J]. Accounting Review, 2011, 86(6):1969-1994.

The Exercise and Creation of Growth Options and Risk Premium: From the Perspective of Firm Lifecycle

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 6

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10

[1]	WU Ze-fu, CHEN Jin-long, WU Jie. Earning Management, Audit Skepticism and Litigation Risk Premium [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2014, 22(12): 26-33.
[2]	CHEN Ping-lu, QIAN Ning-yu. Study on Investment, Consumption and Risk Premium under Unanticipated News [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2012, 20(5): 47-54.
[3]	XUE Ming-gao, SU Li-li. Risk Premium, Uncertainty and Multi-stages of Patent Investment [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2010, 18(3): 1-9.
[4]	MAO Ze-chun. The Premium of Stochastic Compound Risk [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2009, 17(3): 27-33.
[5]	GUO Zhan-qin, ZHOU Zong-fang, LI Jian-ping. Loan Pricing Model of Commercial Bank Based on Credit and Market Correlation Risk [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2007, 15(6): 1-6.
[6]	LUO Deng-yue, WANG Chun-feng, FANG Zhen-ming. An Empirical Research on the Relationship between Aggregate Liquidity and Asset Pricing in China Stock Market [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2007, 15(2): 33-38.