针对中小企业融资困境的现实，本文基于贸易信用融资模式，引入税盾效应，建立了由单一核心供应商和单一经销商组成的含税盾的贸易信用模型，探讨有融资需求的经销商进行订货、核心供应商定价的决定策略，探究不同计息方式的价值实现和融资模式优选。通过stackbelberg博弈、比较分析和算例验证，研究发现以订货量确定为基准，融资需求出现的时点对供应链企业计息方式的选择均有影响。税法关于利息抵扣上限、贸易信用贷款利率、订货量等均影响经销商计息方式的选择，融资额度影响其订货策略；生产成本的差额、定价策略影响供应商的计息方式。
Paying corporate income tax is an obligation that all enterprises must undertake. The tax burden is a cost that all businesses cannot afford to ignore. But the tax act has led to a tax shield for businesses with financing. It could offset some of the taxes that should be paid by the capital-raising companies. So, to target to optimize supply chain enterprises in the financial system, it embodies in the supply chain enterprises have financing leverage risk and cost and tax shield effect in the process of weighing, and combines with different ways of financing interest cash situation analysis, so that more accurate and practical business decision-making has been done.Research is based on trade credit financing pattern, introducing the tax shield effect, and establishes a trade credit model with tax shield in a two-stage supply chain composed of a single core supplier and a single dealer. The research studies supply chain dealers' quantity strategy with financing needs are and core suppliers price strategy, discusses the value of explicit and implicit interest means on the enterprise supply chain. And the decision-making guidance is provided for the choice of the means of payment in the trade credit.Through the Stackbelberg game and optimization and comparative analysis, the best order decision of the distributor and the best price decision of the supplier are found, and further according to the way of interest on cash or a pre-determined recessive and dominant plan breath way of financing demand point, we put on the supply chain enterprise respectively in four kinds of situations. The comparison and analysis of the profit of enterprise target in different situation is analyzed, and the decision in the highest profit situation is the optimal decision choice of the enterprise.Through the comparative analysis, it is found that when dealers need financing after the quantity of goods is determined, if tax on the interest deduction ceiling is lower than the similar bank loan rate in the same period, implicit interest settlement is far more valuable to dealers; When dealers need financing before ordering and credit line is lower than a critical value under explicit way, dealers are motivated to prefer radical ordering strategy with the way of implicit interest. At the same time, the cost of tax and purchasing and expected earning is a tradeoff for dealers. Different ways of interest with a special turn are chosen when the order quantity is different. When suppliers need financing before ordering, if production cost balance under two way of interest settlement is lower than a critical value, implicit interest settlement is more valuable to suppliers; When suppliers need financing after ordering, suppliers should choose the better way of interest settlement combing with pricing strategy.Finally, an example is used to discuss the distributed photovoltaic power plant and power grid generation in the process of trade credit payment delay occurs, profits and the decision variables of the power plant and power grid and the decision variables and the relationship between important parameters. The conclusion of this paper is proved by numerical analysis. Our research will help the analysis of enterprise decisions in other financing modes of supply chain finance. The disadvantages of ignoring the tax factors of traditional supply chain financial models are remedied. It not only makes the financing in the supply chain enterprise decision-making more accurate and more guiding significance, but also provides strong evidence for financing on the supply chain enterprise's capital structure adjustment and the establishment of financial decisions. Because the research is based on the fact that the enterprise income tax is taken as the breakthrough point in many types of taxes, so for other relevant tax and financial system of supply chain optimization and decision-making, research has inspired lead role. Other relevant research can be based on this model and follow the research idea of this paper.
[1] Chen Xiangfeng, Wan Guohua. The effect of financing service on a budget-constrained supply chain[J]. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, 2011, 28(4):457-485.
[2] Lai G M, Debo L G, Sycara K. Sharing inventory risk in supply chain:The implication of financial constraint[J]. Omega, 2009, 37(4):811-825.
[3] Raghavan N R, Mishra V K. Short-term financing in a cash-constrained supply chain[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2011, 134(2):407-412.
[4] 于辉,王亚文. 供应链金融视角下利率市场化的鲁棒分析模型[J]. 中国管理科学,2016,24(02):19-26.
[5] Hofmann E. Supply chain finance:some conceptual insights[M]//Lasch R, Janker C G. Logistik management:Innovative logistikkonzepte, German Universitä-tsverlag, Wiesbaden,2015:203-214.
[6] Camerinelli E. Supply chain finance[J]. Journal of Payments Strategy & Systems, 2009,3(2):114-128.
[7] Hu Min, Hu Qifan. Supply chain finance and analysis of its financing models[C]//Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of Chinese Logistics and Transportation Professionals, Chengdu, China, October 8-10,2010.
[8] Chod J. Inventory, risk shifting, and trade credit[J]. Management Science, 2016, 63(10):1-20.
[9] PeuraH, Yang SA,Lai G. Risk or margin:The role of trade credit in competition[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, Unpublished manuscript, London Business School,2015.
[10] Kouvelis P, Zhao Wenhui. Financing the newsvendor:Supplier vs. bank, the structure of the optimal trade credit contract[J]. Operations Research, 2012, 60(3):566-580.
[11] 王宗润,田续燃,陈晓红. 考虑隐性股权的应收账款融资模式下供应链金融博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学,2015,23(09):1-8.
[12] 鲁其辉,姚佳希,周伟华. 基于EOQ模型的存货质押融资业务模式选择研究[J]. 中国管理科学,2016,24(01):56-66.
[13] Chen Xiangfeng, Wang Anyu. Trade credit contract with limited liability in the supply chain with budget constraints[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2012, 196(1):153-165.
[14] 陈祥锋.资金约束供应链中贸易信用合同的决策与价值[J]. 管理科学学报, 2013, 16(12):13-20.
[15] Myers S C. The capital structure puzzle[J]. Journal of Finance, 1984, 39(3):575-592.
[16] Wang Taosha. Capital structure, debt tax shield, and firm value-A propensity score matching approach[D]. Massachusetts:Tafts University, 2015.
[17] Krause MV,LahmannA. Reconsidering the appropriate discount rate for tax shield valuation[J]. Journal of Business Economics, 2016, 86(5):477-512.
[18] Doidge C, Dyck A. Taxes and corporate policies:Evidence from a quasi natural experiment[J]. Journal of Finance, 2015, 70(1):45-89.
[19] 王跃堂, 王亮亮, 彭洋. 产权性质、债务税盾与资本结构[J]. 经济研究, 2010,(9):122-136.
[20] Graham J R. and Mills L F. Using tax return data to simulate corporate marginal tax rates[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2008,46(2-3):366-388.
[21] Fama E F, French K R. Testing trade-off and pecking order predictions about dividends and debt[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 2002, 15(1):1-33.
[22] 胡劲松,胡玉梅. 模糊环境下考虑缺货和延期支付的Stackelberg均衡策略[J]. 管理工程学报, 2011, 25(2):87-94.
[23] 占济舟,卢锐. 零售商采购资金约束下供应链融资方式的选择策略研究[J]. 管理工程学报, 2016, 30(3):106-113.
[24] Zhang Qinhong, Dong Ming, Luo Jianwen,et al. Supply chain coordination with trade credit and quantity discount incorporating default risk[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2014, 153(4):352-360.
[25] Chang HL, Rhee BD. Coordination contracts in the presence of positive inventory financing costs[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2010, 124(2):331-339.
[26] Kouvelis P, Zhao Wenhua. Supply chain contract design under financial constraints and bankruptcy costs[J]. Management Science, 2016, 62(8):2341-2357.
[27] Silver E A, Pyke D F, Peterson R. Inventory management and production planning and scheduling[J]. Reliable Computing, 1998, 12(2):141-151.
[28] Luo Wei, Shang K. Managing inventory for entrepreneurial firms with trade credit and payment defaults[J]. Ssrn Electronic Journal, Unpublished manuscript, University of Navarra,2013.
[29] 张义刚,唐小我. 延迟支付下短生命周期产品批发价契约研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2011, 19(3):63-69.
[30] Cachon G P. Supply chain coordination with contracts[J]. Handbooks in Operations and Management Science:Supply Chain Optimization, 2003,11:227-339.
[31] Huh WT, Park KS. Impact of transfer pricing methods for tax purposes on supply chain performance under demand uncertainty[J]. Naval Research Logistics, 2013, 60(4):269-293.
