货币政策冲击对工业产出和价格的非对称影响，是新常态下把握好货币供给政策的方向、力度和节奏的重要参考依据，有助于提升货币供给政策的针对性、灵活性和前瞻性。局部投影方法在不同区制下，计算工业产出和价格对货币供给冲击的脉冲响应结果表明：货币供给冲击对工业产出的影响具有不确定性，且总体上表现为中性特征；而货币供给冲击对工业价格的影响不仅在不同区制下，而且在新常态前后均表现出显著的差异性和非对称性，总体来说是短期有效，长期中性的。情景设计的分析结果显示新常态下采用增加货币供给的政策来刺激工业经济是不可取的，其作用效果可能出现工业产出停滞不前，工业价格急剧飙升的工业滞胀。因此，需要从工业产业升级，工业技术创新等工业供给侧寻求工业经济新的增长点和动力机制。
The asymmetric effects of monetary policy shocks to industrial output and price has great influence in the direction, intensity and rhythm of macroeconomic policy, and could improve the pertinency, flexibility and forward-ooking of monetary supply policy. The local projection is used to calculate the response of industrial output and price to monetary supply shocks under different regime of industrial output, price and money supply. The empirical results show that the influence of monetary supply shock to industrial output is uncertain, and has a neutral characteristic overall. The scenario analysis also confirms the above conclusion. There is an asymmetric impact of money supply on the industrial price, not only under different regime of the variables, but also before and after the new normal. The overall performance is that the shock has an effect on short-term, which is however invalid in a long-term. The results of scenario designing and analysis show that the use of monetary policy to stimulate normal under the new normal is not desirable, Its impact on the industrial output growth is uncertain and neutral, while it has a significantly positive influence on the industrial prices growth. The possible outcomes is industrial stagflation, which is the industrial output stagnated, while industrial prices soaring. Therefore, a new growth point and mechanism need to be found from the supply side of industrial, such as industrial upgrading, industrial technology innovation and other actions.
[1] 程方楠, 孟卫东. 宏观审慎政策与货币政策的协调搭配——基于贝叶斯估计的DSGE模型[J]. 中国管理科学,2017,25(1):11-20.
[2] Bagliano F C, Favero C A. Measuring monetary policy with VAR models:An evaluation[J]. European Economic Review,1998,42(6):1069-1112.
[3] Ball L, Mankiw N G. Asymmetric price adjustment and economic fluctuations[J]. The Economic Journal,1994,104(423):247-261.
[4] Christiano L J, Eichenbaum M, Evans C L. Identification and the effects of monetary policy shocks[M]//Blejer M I, Eckstein Z, Hercowitz Z, et al. Financial factors in economic stabilization and growth. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1996:36-74.
[5] Evans C L, Marshall D A. Monetary policy and the term structure of nominal interest rates:Evidence and theory[J]. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy,1998,49:53-111.
[6] Sims C A. Interpreting the macroeconomic time series facts[J]. European Economic Review,1992,36(5):975-1000.
[7] 刘斌. 货币政策冲击的识别及我国货币政策有效性的实证分析[J]. 金融研究,2001,(7):1-9.
[8] Karras G. Are the output effects of monetary policy asymmetric? Evidence from a sample of European countries[J]. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics,1996,58(2):267-278.
[9] Senda T. Asymmetric effects of money supply shocks and trend inflation[J]. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 2001, 33(1):65-89.
[10] Sims C A. Macroeconomics and reality[J]. Econometrica, 1980, 48(1):1-48.
[11] Jorda O. Estimation and inference of impulse responses by local projections[J]. The American Economic Review, 2005, 95(1):161-182.
[12] Koop G, Pesaran M H, Potter S M. Impulse response analysis in nonlinear multivariate models[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 1996, 74(1):119-147.
[13] Potter S M. Nonlinear impulse response functions[J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2000, 24(10):1425-1446.
[14] Weise C L. The asymmetric effects of monetary policy:A nonlinear vector autoregression approach[J]. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 1999, 31(1):85-108.
[15] Assenmacher-Wesche K. Estimating central banks' preferences from a time-varying empirical reaction function[J]. European Economic Review, 2006, 50(8):1951-1974.
[16] Lütkepohl H, Teräsvirta T, Wolters J. Investigating stability and linearity of a german M1 money demand function[J]. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 1999, 14(5):511-525.
[17] Christopoulos D K, Leon-Ledesma M A. A long-run non-linear approach to the Fisher effect[J]. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 2007, 39(2-3):543-559.
[18] 冯春平. 货币供给对产出与价格影响的变动性[J]. 金融研究, 2002, (7):18-25.
[19] 赵进文, 闵捷. 央行货币政策操作效果非对称性实证研究[J]. 经济研究, 2005, (2):26-34+53.
[20] 赵进文, 黄彦. 中国货币政策与通货膨胀关系的模型实证研究[J]. 中国社会科学, 2006, (2):45-54+205-206.
[21] 刘金全, 郑挺国. 我国货币政策冲击对实际产出周期波动的非对称影响分析[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2006, (10):3-14.
[22] 彭方平, 王少平. 我国货币政策的微观效应——基于非线性光滑转换面板模型的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2007, (9):31-41.
[23] 郑挺国, 刘金全. 我国货币-产出非对称影响关系的实证研究[J]. 经济研究, 2008, (1):33-45.
[24] 刘金全, 隋建利, 李楠. 基于非线性VaR模型对我国货币政策非对称作用效应的实证检验[J]. 中国管理科学, 2009,17(3):47-55.
[25] 刘汉, 刘金全. 中国宏观经济情境设计与路径预测[J]. 中国管理科学, 2013,21(1):47-56.
[26] 刘金全, 隋建利, 闫超. 中国实际产出增长率及其不确定性中的长期记忆性和相关性测度[J]. 社会科学战线, 2010,21(1):47-55.
[27] 汤丹. 基干svar模型的中国核心通货膨胀估计及预测评价研究[J]. 宏观经济研究, 2015, (1):109-115.
[28] 黄群慧. "新常态"、工业化后期与工业增长新动力[J]. 中国工业经济, 2014, (10):5-19.
[29] 田奇. 从工业经济运行看货币政策传导衰减成因[J]. 当代经济, 2000, (8):30-31.
[30] 刘海英, 何彬. 工业增长、信贷供求和货币政策调整[J]. 中国工业经济, 2009, (7):5-15.
[31] Scheffe H. A method for judging all contrasts in the analysis of variance[J]. Biometrika, 1953, 40(1-2):87-110.
[32] Jorda O. Simultaneous confidence regions for impulse responses[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2009, 91(3):629-647.
[33] Hurvich C M, Tsai C-L. A corrected Akaike information criterion for vector autoregressive model selection[J]. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 1993, 14(3):271-279.
[34] 刘金全, 张文刚, 刘兆波. 货币供给增长率与通货膨胀率之间的短期波动影响和长期均衡关系分析[J]. 中国软科学, 2004, (7):39-44.
[35] 陈望远, 李仲飞, 黄金波. "中国货币之谜":事实还是假象[J]. 中国经济问题, 2012, (4):32-41.
[36] Hansen B E. Sample splitting and threshold estimation[J]. Econometrica, 2000, 68(3):575-603.
[37] 龙少波, 胡国良, 王继源. 国际大宗商品价格波动、投资驱动、货币供给与PPT低迷——基于TVP-VAR-SV模型的动态分析[J]. 国际金融研究, 2016, (5):3-14.
[38] 黄群慧, 原磊. 步入"新常态"的工业经济运行:发展特征与未来趋势[J]. 区域经济评论, 2015, (3):24-33.
[39] 刘伟, 蔡志洲. 我国工业化进程中产业结构升级与新常态下的经济增长[J]. 北京大学学报:哲学社会科学版, 2015, 52(3):5-19.
[40] 赵昌文, 许召元, 朱鸿鸣. 工业化后期的中国经济增长新动力[J]. 中国工业经济, 2015, (6):44-54.
[41] 金碚. 中国经济发展新常态研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2015, (1):5-18.
