主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
论文

平台介入的多物流服务提供商合作模式研究

展开
  • 1. 南京审计大学金融学院, 江苏 南京 211815;
    2. 南京工业大学经济与管理学院, 江苏 南京 211800

收稿日期: 2015-08-04

  修回日期: 2016-10-08

  网络出版日期: 2017-06-29

基金资助

国家自然科学基金资助项目(71301073);国家社科基金重大项目(12&ZD204);江苏省重点序列学科应用经济学(苏政办发[2014]37号)

Study of Cooperative Models in Logistics Service Supply Chain with Service Platform

Expand
  • 1. School of Finance, Nanjing Audit University, Nanjing 211815, China;
    2. College of Economics and Management, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211800, China

Received date: 2015-08-04

  Revised date: 2016-10-08

  Online published: 2017-06-29

摘要

电子商务的发展凸显了平台服务和物流服务的重要性。针对供应链服务平台介入的两个功能型物流服务提供商和单个物流服务集成商构成的物流服务供应链,研究了四种合作模式:集中决策、分散决策、物流服务提供商与集成商合作和两物流服务提供商合作。在价格和物流服务水平共同影响市场需求的前提下,通过构建博弈模型,得到了最优服务水平、服务订购价格、服务销售价格以及整条供应链的总利润;进一步应用数值算例考察了单位信息费和服务水平敏感因子对服务价格、市场需求和利润的影响。研究发现:三种合作模型的供应链总利润总大于分散决策下的总利润,集中决策的销售价格甚至比不合作时的批发价格更低,市场总需求大幅提高并保持最优服务水平不变。研究还表明,供应链服务平台在制定单位信息费时应当慎重斟酌,收取过高费用对于整个市场及参与者极为不利,合理的单位信息费有利于整个市场的健康、长期、稳步地发展。研究结果有助于物流服务供应链企业更好地制定管理决策。

本文引用格式

石岿然, 浦珏, 孙玉玲 . 平台介入的多物流服务提供商合作模式研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017 , 25(4) : 78 -85 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2017.04.010

Abstract

Effective and efficient platform service and logistic operations crucially influence the success of firms in the newly emerged e-commerce. The logistics industry in China is fragmented, which leads to the duplication of logistics information system functions, the irregular and disconnected data, and asymmetric supply and demand information. The current literature related to e-commerce logistics tend to be qualitative, lack of quantitative analysis about how firms could effectively cooperate with partners. This study aims to investigate a logistics service supply chain system which involves in two functional logistics service providers, a single logistics service integrator and a supply chain service platform. There are four kinds of cooperative models are developed: the centrally cooperative system, the decentralized system, the L-F cooperative system and the F-F cooperative system. It is assumed that consumer demands are determined by sales price of service and logistics device level. Then, the optimal service level, the optimal wholesale price of service, the optimal sales price of service, and total supply chain profits are given by game-theoretic model. Furthermore, numerical examples illustrate the impact of unit information fee and sensitive factors of service level on the service price, market demand and the profits. It is found that the total supply chain profits of three cooperative models are always more than that of the decentralized system. The sale price of centralized system is even lower than the wholesale price of the decentralized system, the total market demand is significantlly increase and the optimal service level remains the same. Research results also show that when the supply chain service platform makes rules of the unit information fee, high charge is undesirable for the whole market and the players. Therefore, reasonable scope of charge can help the whole market have a long-term, steady and healthy development. The results of this study can help firms determine their practical strategies.

参考文献

[1] Annabelle G. Platform, markets and innovation[M].UK:Edward Elgar Publishing, 2010.

[2] 王晓立, 马士华. 供应和需求不确定条件下物流服务供应链能力协调研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2011, 20(2):44-49.

[3] Xu D, Benbasat I, Cenfetelli R T. Integrating service quality with system and information quality:An empirical test in the e-service context[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2013, 37(3):777-794.

[4] 冯华, 王亚琦. 平台商业模式创新研究——基于互联网环境下的时空契合分析[J]. 中国工业经济, 2016, (3):99-113.

[5] 肖剑, 但斌, 张旭梅. 双渠道供应链中制造商与零售商的服务合作定价策略[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2010, 30(12):2203-2211.

[6] 公彦德, 李帮义. 主导模式对供应链决策、稳定性和效率的影响分析[J]. 管理工程学报, 2012, 26(3):42-49.

[7] 王勇, 张小娟. TPLSPs竞争模式下的物流合同[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(9):90-97.

[8] Chen Xiangfeng, Cai G. Joint logistics and financial services by a 3PL firm[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2011, 214(3):579-587.

[9] 贾俊秀, 沈萍, 杜黎. 基于网络顾客行为意向的物流服务供应链定价策略[J]. 运筹与管理, 2014, 23(4):41-50.

[10] 丁斌, 罗秋慧. 在线零售商和物流商的配送能力博弈分析[J]. 科研管理, 2014, 35(3):140-146.

[11] 曹巍, 刘南. 终端网点参与下电子商务物流外包的协调策略研究[J]. 管理工程学报, 2015, 29(4):194-204.

[12] Zhang Jie, Frazier G V. Strategic alliance via co-opetition:Supply chain partnership with a competitor[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2011, 51(4):853-863.

[13] Lu J,Tsao Y, Charoensiriwath C, et al. Dynamic decision-making in a two-stage supply chain with repeated transactions[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2012, 137(2):211-225.

[14] 李剑锋, 陈世平, 易荣华, 等. 二级物流服务供应链定价及其效率研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2013, 21(2):84-90.

[15] 孟丽君, 黄祖庆, 郭小钗. 二级物流服务供应链的契约协调机制研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2014, 23(2):107-115.

[16] Tsay A, Aggrawal N. Channel dynamics under price and service competition[J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2000, 2(4):372-391.
文章导航

/