主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
论文

成本信息不对称下零售商主导的混合渠道供应链决策分析

展开
  • 华南理工大学经济与贸易学院, 广东 广州 510006
颜波(1970-),男(土家族),湖南怀化人,华南理工大学经济与贸易学院教授,博士研究生导师,研究方向:物流与供应链管理.

收稿日期: 2013-12-30

  修回日期: 2014-09-12

  网络出版日期: 2015-12-31

基金资助

广东省软科学研究计划项目(2013B070206013,2015A070704005);广东省科技计划项目(2013B040500007,2013B040200057);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(2015XZD14,2015KXKYJ02)

Decision Analysis of Retailer-dominated Hybrid Channel Supply Chain Under the Asymmetric Cost Information

Expand
  • School of Economics and Commerce, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China

Received date: 2013-12-30

  Revised date: 2014-09-12

  Online published: 2015-12-31

摘要

为研究零售商作为Stackelberg领导者的供应链中制造商的成本信息谎报行为对供应链的影响,本文建立了一条由一个共同零售商主导的包含一个拥有双渠道的制造商和一个仅拥有分销渠道的制造商的混合渠道供应链。首先讨论了供应链成员在制造商成本信息不对称情况下的最优定价问题和制造商追求自身利润最大时的最优谎报因子。然后将两制造商均谎报成本信息、其中一个制造商谎报成本信息与完全信息情况作比较,分析谎报策略对供应链的影响,并用算例通过MATLAB进行了仿真。结果表明:制造商为追求自身利润最大化将高报成本信息,且不同制造商的最优谎报因子与交叉价格敏感度和成本的关系不同;不同渠道结构的制造商谎报成本信息会对供应链造成不同的影响,且影响与顾客对商品价格敏感性有关;制造商谎报成本信息在特定情况下对某些成员有利,但对供应链整体始终不利。这些结论可以为混合渠道供应链中的参与者提供决策依据,提高供应链的效益。

本文引用格式

颜波, 刘艳萍, 李鸿媛 . 成本信息不对称下零售商主导的混合渠道供应链决策分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015 , 23(12) : 124 -134 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.12.015

Abstract

With the development of society,an increasing number of supply chains consisting of manufacturers and retailers are dominated by large retailers, among which, some manufacturers begin to open direct channel to sale goods besides the traditional distribution channel. Vertical and horizontal competitions lead to the manufacturers to hide true cost information in pursuit of self-interest maximization. To discuss the misreporting impact on the supply chain, a hybrid channel supply chain is estabished, which is dominated by a common retailer who acts as the leader of Stackelberg game, and contains a manufacturer (Manufacturer 1) in a dual-channel supply chain and a manufacturer (Manufacturer 2) with only a traditional channel. First, the optimal pricing of the supply chain in the situation of cost information asymmetry and the manufacturers' optimal lied factor for the sake of profit maximization are discussed. Then, three misreporting strategies are compared with the situation of complete information respectively to analyze misreporting's impact on supply chain performance, and some conclusions are derived through MATLAB by a numerical example. The conclusions are: (1) Manufacturers will report their cost information higher than the true cost for profit maximization and different manufacturers' optimal lied factors have different relationship with the cross-price sensitivity and cost. (2) If the cross-price sensitivity of the customer is not very high, Manufacturer 1's reporting his cost information higher will reduce his own profit but increase Manufacturer 2's profit. If not, all the participants' profit will decrease. (3) That Manufacturer 2 reports his cost information higher is good for traditional channel of Manufacturer 1, but will hurt his direct channel. That Manufacturer 2 reports his cost information higher is bad for his own profit if the cross-price sensitivity of the customer is not very high, conversely, all the supply chain members will benefit. (4) If the two manufacturers both misreport their cost information, the profits of supply chain members and the whole supply chain will reduce. Furthermore, the bigger one manufacturer's lied factor is, the smaller his profit is and the smaller the whole profit is. Besides, the bigger the cross-price sensitivity of the customer is, the more obvious the change trend is. Theoretical system of the hybrid channel supply chain further and these conclusions can enhance the efficiency of the hybrid channel supply chain and provide decision-making basis for its participants can be improved in this paper.

参考文献

[1] Lau A H L, Lau H S. Some two-echelon style-goods inventory models with asymmetric market information[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2000, 134(1):29-42.

[2] Lau A H L, Lau H S. Some two-echelon supply-chain games:Improving from deterministic-symmetric-information to stochastic-asymmetric-information models[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2005, 161(1):203-223.

[3] Blair B F, Lewis T R. Optimal retail contracts with asymmetric information and moral hazard[J]. The RAND Journal of Economics, 1994, 25(2):284-296.

[4] 晓斌, 刘鲁, 张阿玲. 非对称需求信息下两阶段供应链协调[J]. 控制与决策, 2004, 19(5):515-519+524.

[5] 郭琼, 杨德礼. 需求信息不对称下基于期权的供应链协作机制的研究[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2006, 12(9):1466-1471.

[6] 陈金亮, 宋华, 徐渝. 不对称信息下具有需求预测更新的供应链合同协调研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2010, 18(1):83-89.

[7] 吴三平, 徐晓燕. 不对称信息下两层供应链的激励机制研究[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2008, 14(3):519-524.

[8] 徐晓燕, 吴三平. 生产成本信息不对称的两级供应链协调研究[J]. 系统工程学报, 2009, 24(1):18-24.

[9] Ha A Y. Supplier-buyer contracting:Asymmetric cost information and cutoff level policy for buyer participation[J]. Naval Research Logistics, 2001, 48(1):41-64.

[10] Lau A H L, Lau H S, Wang Jiancai. Pricing and volume discounting for a dominant retailer with uncertain manufacturing cost information[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2007, 183(2):848-870.

[11] 姬小利. 生产成本信息不对称下的供应链契约设计问题研究[J]. 湖南科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 21(1):64-67.

[12] 申悦, 于瑞峰, 吴甦, 等. 零售商Bertrand竞争下的供应链成本信息共享价值[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 45(11):1581-1584.

[13] 陶文源, 寇纪淞, 李敏强. 信息共享对供应链的影响[J]. 系统工程学报, 2002, 17(6):486-490+561.

[14] Li L. Information Sharing in a Supply Chain with Horizontal Competition[J]. Management Science, 2002, 48(9):1196-1212.

[15] Yao Dongqing, Yue Xiaohang, Liu J. Vertical cost information sharing in a supply chain with value-adding retailers[J]. The International Journal of Management Science, 2008, 36(5):838-851.

[16] Yue Xiaohang, Liu J. Demand forecast sharing in a dual-channel supply chain[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, 174(1):646-667.

[17] 陈忠, 艾兴政. 双渠道信息共享与收益分享合同选择[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2008, 28(12):42-51.

[18] Yan Ruiliang, Pei Zhi. Information asymmetry, pricing strategy and firm's performance in the retailer-multi-channel manufacturer supply chain[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2011, 64(3):377-384.

[19] Yao Dongqing, Yue Xiaohang, Wang Xiaoyin, et al. The impact of information sharing on a returns policy with the addition of a direct channel[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2005, 97(2):196-209.

[20] 陈树桢, 熊中楷, 李根道, 等. 考虑创新补偿的双渠道供应链协调机制研究[J]. 管理工程学报, 2011, 25(2):45-53.
文章导航

/