将行业内企业按单位产品碳排放水平分为高排企业和低排企业两类,并将"共同但有区别的责任原则"引入行业内部,构建基于双寡头竞争市场的碳配额分配策略。通过建立基于分配策略的古诺模型,研究减排目标、分配策略和单位产品碳排放水平对企业的利润差、产量和碳排放的影响。研究结果表明,减排策略对单位产品碳排放水平具有较强的敏感性;当行业中的企业存在单位产品碳排放水平差异时,对低排企业宽松的碳配额分配策略具有更强的减排激励效用,利于企业主动实施低碳技术改造;阶段式递进减排机制对"共同但有区别责任原则"在行业内应用,企业低碳技术改造的激励效用以及减排政策的稳步推进有积极的作用;同时研究表明准确核实企业单位产品碳排放水平的重要性。
According to the current realities of industry and the target of carbon reduction,companies are classified into two categories: high and low ranked by the carbon emission per unit item and introduce' the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities'. Considering history of carbon emissions and incentive by profit margins, a carbon quota allocation policy is present. Based on the allocation policy, a Cournot duopoly model is employed to study the influences on the two categories of reduction targets, quota allocation policy and carbon emission per unit item. The result shows that the quota allocation policy has a positive sensitivity on carbon emission per unit item; generous allocation focusing on low-ranked has a stronger incentive utility on those companies. Moreover, progressive-stage reduction mechanism has a positive effect on both incentive utility of implement a low-carbon and steady implementation of policies. The study highlights the importance of verification on the carbon emissions and also extends the perspectives of research and mechanism design on carbon reduction and will contributes to carbon reduction in China.
[1] 张梓太,沈灏.气候变化国际立法最新进展与中国立法展望[J].南京大学学报:哲学.人文科学.社会科学,2014,51(2):37-43.
[2] 高翔,牛晨.美国气候变化立法进展及启示[J].美国研究,2010,(3):39-51.
[3] 鲍勤,汤铃,汪寿阳,等.美国碳关税对我国经济的影响程度到底如何?基于DCGE模型的分析[J].系统工程理论与实践,2013,33(2):345-353.
[4] Elzen D M, Lucas P,Vuuren D.Abatement costs of post-Kyoto climate regimes[J].Energy Policy, 2005,33(16):2138-2151.
[5] Boehringer C,Koschel H,Moslener U.Efficiency losses from overlapping regulation of EU carbon emissions[J].Journal of Regulatory Economics,2008,33(3):299-317.
[6] Subramanian R,Gupta S,Talbot B.Compliance strategies under permits for emissions [J].Production and Operations Management, 2007,16(6):763-779.
[7] Van Steenberghe V.Core stable and equitable allocations of greenhouse gas emission permits[R].Discussion Paper,Belgian Federal Ministry for Environment,2004.
[8] Zheng Wei,Chen Rongda.The setting of initial allocation approaches of carbon emission per-mits[C].Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Business Intelligence and Financial Engineering (BIFE),Wuhan,China,October 17-20,2011.
[9] Groenenberg H,Blok K.Benchmark based emission all ocation in a cap-and-trade system[J]. Climate Policy,2002,2(1):105-109.
[10] 丁丁,冯静茹.论我国碳交易配额分配方式的选择[J].国际商务:对外经济贸易大学学报,2013,(4):83-92.
[11] 张志耀,张海明.污染物排放总量分配的群体决策方法研究[J].系统科学与数学, 2001,21(4):473-479.
[12] Kling C L, Zhao Jinhua.On the long-run efficiency of auctioned vs. free permits[J].Economics Let-ters,2000,69(2):235-238.
[13] 吴亚琼,赵勇,吴相林,等.初始排污权分配的协商仲裁机制[J].系统工程,2003,21(5):70-74.
[14] Ramudhin A,Chaabane A,Kharoune M,et al. Carbon market sensitive green supply chain network design[C].Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management,Singapore,December 8-11,2008.
[15] 杨珺,卢巍.低碳政策下多容量等级选址与配送问题研究[J].中国管理科学,2014,22(5):51-60.
[16] 黄守军,任玉珑,孙睿,等.双寡头电力市场垂直合作减排的随机微分对策模型[J].中国管理科学,2014,22(2):101-111.
[17] 杜少甫, 董骏峰,梁樑,等.考虑排放许可与交易的生产优化[J].中国管理科学,2009,17(3):81-86.
[18] 慕银平,李韵雅.寡头竞争企业的最优产量及碳排放量联合决策[J].系统工程学报,2014,29(1):1-7.
