能源价格波动对能源-环境-经济系统的影响研究

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2018.11.003

中国管理科学 ›› 2018, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (11): 22-30.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2018.11.003

能源价格波动对能源-环境-经济系统的影响研究

郭正权¹, 张兴平², 郑宇花³

1. 北方工业大学经济管理学院, 北京 100144;
2. 华北电力大学经济与管理学院, 北京 102206;
3. 北京工商大学商学院, 北京 100048

收稿日期:2017-08-14 修回日期:2018-01-26 出版日期:2018-11-20 发布日期:2019-01-23
通讯作者: 张兴平(1972-),男(汉族),山西人,华北电力大学经济与管理学院,教授,研究方向:能源经济及政策研究,E-mail:zxp@ncepu.edu.cn. E-mail:zxp@ncepu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金重大项目（15ZDB165）

Impacts of Energy Price Fluctuations on Energy-Environment-Economy System in China

GUO Zheng-quan¹, ZHANG Xing-ping², ZHENG Yu-hua³

1. School of Economics and Management, North China University of Technology, Beijing 100144, China;
2. School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China;
3. Business School, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China

Received:2017-08-14 Revised:2018-01-26 Online:2018-11-20 Published:2019-01-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文构建可计算一般均衡模型，分析了不同情景下能源价格波动对我国能源-环境-经济系统的影响，实现了对投入产出表中能源部门的细分。首先通过双比例平衡法将石油与天然气开采业细分为石油开采业与天然气开采业；然后依据投入产出表编制法将电力部门细分为火电、水电、核电、风电、太阳能及其它电力，以分析相关政策对能源-环境-经济系统变量的影响。研究结果表明：化石能源价格下降对实际GDP与社会福利具有正面效应，促进了化石能源消费与碳排放增加，并抑制了清洁电力需求，对环境系统产生了负面影响。碳税政策有利于促进清洁电力发展并抑制化石能源消费和碳排放的增加，因此构建碳税和化石能源价格联动的政策机制有利于节能减排和清洁能源的发展。当可再生能源电力效率有效提升后，市场化电价机制有利于可再生电力的发展。反之，政府管制电价有利于可再生能源电力的发展。研究结果具有较强的政策含义。

关键词: 可计算一般均衡模型, 能源价格, 能源部分细分, 碳税政策

Abstract: Recently China has experienced many changes in energy field including coal and oil price decline, rapid development of renewable energy, levying environmental tax in 2018, and so on. Energy price fluctuation has significant impacts on the economic and environmental system since energy is an important input in production. A computable general equilibrium model is conducted to explore the impacts of energy prices fluctuations on the China's Energy-Economy-Environment system in various scenarios, in which we take into account the fossil energy prices decline,technical progress in clean power, carbon tax policy and the electricity market reform.
The energy sectors are disaggregated in detail based on the 2012 Input-Output table of China. The petroleum and natural gas extraction sector is disaggregated into two subsectors of petroleum extraction sector and natural gas extractionsector by using the bi-proportional scaling method. The electric power sector is disaggregated into two subsectors of thermal electricity sector and clean electricity sector. Moreover, the clean electricity is disaggregated into four subdivisions including nuclear electricity, hydroelectricity, wind power, solar energy and others. Consequently, the energy sectors in the CGE model include 11 subsectors including the coal, coking, crude oil, petroleum, natural gas, gas, thermal electricity, nuclear electricity, hydroelectricity, wind power and solar energy and others.
The empirical results show that the decline of fossil energy price in various policy scenarios has positive effects on actual GDP and social welfare. But it will negatively affect the environmental system, since it will increase energy consumption and carbon emissions, and restrain the clean electricity demand. While the carbon tax policy has the opposite effects, a dynamic adjusted carbon tax policy associated with the fossil energy price fluctuation is an effective policy choice to promote clean power development and mitigate fossil energy consumption and carbon emissions. When the technique efficiency of clean renewable energy is improved significantly, the market-oriented tariff mechanism is conducive to the development of clean renewable power. Otherwise, the electricity price mandated by the government is advantageous. The research results have intensive policy implications.

Key words: computable general equilibrium model, energy price, energy sectors subdivision, carbon tax policy

中图分类号:

F062.1
N949

郭正权, 张兴平, 郑宇花. 能源价格波动对能源-环境-经济系统的影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(11): 22-30.

GUO Zheng-quan, ZHANG Xing-ping, ZHENG Yu-hua. Impacts of Energy Price Fluctuations on Energy-Environment-Economy System in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(11): 22-30.

参考文献

[1] 姬强,刘炳越,范英.国际油气价格与汇率动态相依关系研究:基于一种新的时变最优Copula模型[J].中国管理科学,2016,24(10):1-9.

[2] 曹飞.石油价格冲击与中国实际经济波动研究-基于开放RBC模型的分析[J]. 中国管理科学,2015,23(7):45-52.

[3] 李霜,简志宏,郑俊瑶.石油价格冲击与经济波动风险最小化的货币供应机制分析[J].中国管理科学,2012,20(2):26-33.

[4] Doroodian K,Boyd R.The linkage between oil price shocks and economic growth with inflation in the presence of technological advances:A CGEmodel[J].Energy Policy,2003,31(10):989-1006.

[5] Guivarch C,Hallegatte S,Crassous R.The resilience of the Indian economy to rising oil prices as a validation test for a global energy-environment-economy CGE model[J].Energy Policy,2009,37(11):4259-4266.

[6] Aydin L,Acar M.Economic impact of oil price shocks on the Turkish economy in the coming decades:A dynamic CGE analysis[J].Energy Policy,2011,39(3):1722-1731.

[7] Maisonnave H,Pycroft J,Saveyn B,et al.Does climate policy make the EU economy more resilient to oil price rises? A CGE analysis[J].Energy Policy,2012,47:172-179.

[8] OrlovA.An assessment of optimal gas pricing in Russia:A CGE approach[J].Energy Economics,2015,49,492-506.

[9] Solaymani S,Kardooni R,Kari F,et al.Economic and environmental impacts of energy subsidy reform and oil price shock on the Malaysian transport sector[J].Travel Behaviour& Society,2015,2(2):65-77.

[10] Capros P,Paroussos L,Charalampidis I,et al. Assessment of the macroeconomic and sectoral effects of higher electricity and gas prices in the EU:A general equilibrium modeling approach[J].Energy Strategy Review,2016,9:18-27.

[11] 林伯强,牟敦国.能源价格对宏观经济的影响——基于可计算一般均衡(CGE)的分析[J].经济研究,2008,(11):88-101.

[12] He Y,Zhang S,Yang L,et al.Economic analysis of coal price-electricity price adjustment in China based on the CGE model[J].Energy Policy,2010,38(11):6629-6637.

[13] Li Jifeng,Wang Xin,Zhang Yaxiong,et al.The economic impact of carbon pricing with regulated electricity prices in China-An application of a computable general equilibrium approach[J].Energy Policy,2014,75:46-56.

[14] Liu Jingyu,Lin S,Xia Yan,et al.A financial CGE model analysis:Oil price shocks and monetary policy responses in China[J].Economic Modelling,2015,51:534-543.

[15] Dong Baomin,Ma Xili,Wang Ningjing,et al.Impacts of exchange rate volatility and international oil price shock on China's regional economy:A dynamic CGE analysis[J].Energy Economics,doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2017.09.014,(accepted).

[16] Zhang Wei,Yang Jun,Zhang Zongyi,et al.Natural gas price effects in China based on the CGE model[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2017,147:497-505.

[17] He Yongda,Lin Boqiang.The impact of natural gas price control in China:A computable general equilibrium approach[J].Energy Policy,2017,107,524-531.

[18] Guo Zhengquan,Zhang Xingping,Zheng Yuhua,et al.Exploring the impacts of a carbon tax on the Chinese economy using a CGE model with a detailed disaggregation of energy sectors[J].Energy Economics,2014,45:455-462.

[19] 国家统计局国民经济核算司.中国2012年投入产出表编制方法[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2014.

[20] 《中国电力年鉴》编辑委员会,2013-中国电力年鉴[M].北京:中国电力出版社,2013.

[21] 国家统计局能源统计司编,中国能源统计年鉴-2013[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2013.

[22] 宣晓伟.用CGE模型分析征收硫税对中国经济的影响[D].北京:北京大学,1998.

[23] 贺菊煌,沈可挺,徐嵩龄.碳税与二氧化碳减排的CGE模型[J].数量经济与技术经济,2002,19(10):39-47.

[24] 谭显东.电力可计算一般均衡模型的构建及应用研究[D].北京:华北电力大学,2008.

[25] 王灿.基于动态CGE模型的中国气候政策模拟与分析[D].北京:清华大学,2003.

[26] Chi Yuanying,Guo Zhengquan,Zheng Yuhua,et al.Scenarios analysis of the energies' consumption and carbon emissions in China based on a dynamic CGE model[J].Sustainability,2014, 6(2):487-512.

能源价格波动对能源-环境-经济系统的影响研究

Impacts of Energy Price Fluctuations on Energy-Environment-Economy System in China

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 3

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	周艳菊, 胡凤英, 周正龙. 碳税政策下制造商竞争的供应链定价策略和社会福利研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(7): 94-105.
[2]	杨福霞, 徐江川, 杨冕, 史岩. 能源价格波动、诱导性技术进步与中国环境全要素生产率[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(11): 31-41.
[3]	崔连标, 范英, 朱磊, 毕清华, 张毅. 碳排放交易对实现我国“十二五”减排目标的成本节约效应研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2013, (1): 37-46.