供应链核心企业订单分配下供应商群体减排行为演化

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.0024

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 环保消费者认为供应链中的核心企业要对其供应商的环境表现负责。供应商群体的环境表现影响核心企业的市场吸引力，这驱动核心企业激励其供应商群体减排。本研究为供应链核心企业设计一种同时考虑供应商批发价格和减排量的订单分配方法。基于Multi-Agent思想构建了一个包含供应商群体、核心企业、消费者群体的计算实验模型，并借助计算机动态模拟多主体在多周期的决策和交互过程，从宏观角度探索供应商群体减排行为的演化路径，并从微观上剖析内在影响机理。实验结果显示，该订单分配方法能获得既激励供应商群体减排又提高核心企业自身收益的效果；当消费者群体环境意识的分布一定时，核心企业的激励作用有限；核心企业的订单分配是激励供应商群体减排的直接手段，环保消费者的购买行为是推动供应商群体减排的根本动力。这些结论对现实中供应链核心企业制定订单分配规则和政府制定环境政策具有一定的管理启示。

关键词: 供应链核心企业；订单分配；减排行为；计算实验

Abstract: Focal firm’s work is usually outsourced to a number of suppliers. Consumers suggest that the focal firm is responsible for suppliers’ environmental performance. Thus, the focal firm’s market demand is affected by suppliers’ environmental performances. This promotes focal firms to stimulate their suppliers to reduce emissions. Allocating orders to suppliers is the focal firm’s regular decision. Thus, there is no need to sign extra contracts if the focal firm stimulates suppliers to reduce emissions through order allocation process. It has been found that the reason why focal firms have the ability to influence their suppliers’ behavior is that they have the power to allocate orders. In this study, an order allocation method that could stimulate suppliers to reduce emissions is designed a for focal firm.

Key words: focal firm of supply chain; order allocation; emission reduction behavior; computational experiment

中图分类号:

F272

于晓慧,肖条军,杜建国. 供应链核心企业订单分配下供应商群体减排行为演化[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(2): 106-117.

YU Xiao-hui,XIAO Tiao-jun,DU Jian-guo. Evolution of Suppliers’ Emission Reduction Behavior under the Order Allocation Rule of Focal Firm[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(2): 106-117.

参考文献

［1］ Hartmann J, Moeller S. Chain liability in multitier supply chains? Responsibility attributions for unsustainable supplier behavior ［J］. Journal of Operations Management, 2014, 32(5): 281-294.
［2］ Koplin J, Seuring S, Mesterharm M. Incorporating sustainability into supply management in the automotive industry – the case of the Volkswagen AG ［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2007, 15(11): 1053-1062.
［3］阿里研究院, 阿里社会公益部. 2016年中国绿色消费者报告［EB/OL］. (2016-08-03) ［2016-08-04］. https://www.sohu.com/a/108953836_263856.Ali Research, Ali Social Welfare Department. China green consumers report in 2016 ［EB/OL］. (2016-08-03) ［2016-08-04］. https://www.sohu.com/a/108953836_263 856.
［4］周艳菊, 黄雨晴, 陈晓红, 等. 促进低碳产品需求的供应链减排成本分担模型［J］. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(7): 85-93.Zhou Yanju, Huang Yuqing, Chen Xiaohong, et al. Carbon emission reduction cost-sharing model in supply chain based on improving the demand for low-carbon products ［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015, 23(7): 85-93.
［5］ Ghosh D, Shah J. Supply chain analysis under green sensitive consumer demand and cost sharing contract ［J］. International Journal of Production Economics, 2015, 164: 319-329.
［6］ Xu Xiaoping, He Ping, Xu Hao, et al. Supply chain coordination with green technology under cap-and- trade regulation ［J］. International Journal of Production Economics, 2017, 183: 433-442.
［7］王芹鹏, 赵道致. 消费者低碳偏好下的供应链收益共享契约研究［J］. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(9): 106- 113.Wang Qinpeng, Zhao Daozhi. Revenue-sharing contract of supply chain based on customer’s preference for low carbon products ［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2014, 22(9): 106-113.
［8］ Wang Liang, Xu Tingjia, Qin Longhao. Study on supply chain emission reduction level based on carbon tax and consumers’ low-carbon preferences under stochastic demand ［J］. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2019, 02: 263-283.
［9］ Tate W L, Ellram L M, Dooley K J. Environmental purchasing and supplier management (EPSM): Theory and practice ［J］. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 2012, 18(3): 171-188.
［10］ Grimm J H, Hofstetter J S, Sarkis J. Exploring sub-suppliers compliance with corporate sustainability standards ［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 112: 1971-1984.
［11］ Caniato F, Caridi M, Crippa L, et al. Environmental sustainability in fashion supply chains: An exploratory case based research ［J］. International Journal of Production Economics, 2012, 135(2): 659-670.
［12］ Yang Huixiao, Chen Wenbo. Retailer-driven carbon emission abatement with consumer environmental awareness and carbon tax: Revenue-sharing versus cost-sharing ［J］. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 2018, 78: 179-191.
［13］曹柬, 吴晓波, 周根贵. 不对称信息下绿色采购激励机制设计［J］. 系统工程理论与实践, 2013, 33(1): 106-116.Cao Jian, Wu Xiaobo, Zhou Gengui. Design of incentive mechanism for green purchasing with asymmetric information ［J］. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2013, 33(1): 106-116.
［14］ Li Qinqin, Xiao Tiaojun, Qiu Yuzhuo. Price and carbon emission reduction decisions and revenue-sharing contract considering fairness concerns ［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 190: 303-314.
［15］ Liu Zugang, Anderson T D, Cruz J M. Consumer environmental awareness and competition in two-stage supply chains ［J］. European Journal of Operational Research, 2012, 218(3): 602-613.
［16］ Xie Gang. Cooperative strategies for sustainability in a decentralized supply chain with competing suppliers ［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 113: 807-821.
［17］周艳菊, 胡凤英, 周正龙. 碳税政策下制造商竞争的供应链定价策略和社会福利研究［J］. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(7): 94-105.Zhou Yanju, Hu Fengying, Zhou Zhenglong. Pricing strategy and social welfare in supply chain with competing manufacturers based on carbon tax policy ［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(7): 94-105.
［18］ Lang Xu, Wang Chuanxu, Zhao Junjie. Decision and coordination in the dual-channel supply chain considering cap-and-trade regulation ［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 197: 551-561.
［19］ Ji Jingna, Zhang Zhiyong, Yang Lei. Carbon emission reduction decisions in the retail-/dual-channel supply chain with consumers’ preference ［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 141: 852-867.
［20］ Yang Lei, Zhang Qin, Ji Jingna. Pricing and carbon emission reduction decisions in supply chains with vertical and horizontal cooperation ［J］. International Journal of Production Economics, 2017, 191: 286-297.
［21］ Zhu Wenge, He Yuanjie. Green product design in supply chains under competition ［J］. European Journal of Operational Research, 2017, 258(1): 165-180.
［22］ Awaysheh A, Klassen R D. The impact of supply chain structure on the use of supplier socially responsible practices ［J］. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 2010, 30(12): 1246-1268.
［23］盛昭瀚, 张维. 管理科学研究中的计算实验方法［J］. 管理科学学报, 2011, 14(5): 1-10.Sheng Zhaohan, Zhang Wei. Computational experiments in management science and research ［J］. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2011, 14(5): 1-10.
［24］孟庆峰, 盛昭瀚, 李真. 基于公平偏好的供应链质量激励机制效率演化［J］. 系统工程理论与实践, 2012, 32(11): 2394-2403.Meng Qingfeng, Sheng Zhaohan, Li Zhen. Efficiency evolution of quality incentive in supply chain based on fairness preference ［J］. Systems Engineering- Theory& Practice, 2012, 32(11): 2394-2403.
［25］ Liu Yong, Ye Hong. The dynamic study on firm’s environmental behavior and influencing factors: An adaptive agent-based modeling approach ［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2012, 37: 278-287.
［26］赵爱武, 杜建国, 关洪军. 消费者异质需求下企业环境创新行为演化模拟与分析［J］. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(6): 124-132.Zhao Aiwu, Du Jianguo, Guan Hongjun. Evolution of enterprise environmental innovation behavior under heterogeneity demand of consumer ［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(6): 124-132.
［27］ Meng Qingfeng, Zhu Hongming, Li Zhen, et al. How green building product decisions from customers can be transitioned to manufacturers: An agent-based model ［J］. Sustainability, 2018, 10(11): 663-676.
［28］ Plambeck E L, Taylor T A. Supplier evasion of a buyer’s audit: Implications for motivating supplier social and environmental responsibility ［J］. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 2016, 18(2): 184-197.
［29］ Kanchanapibul M, Lacka E, Wang Xiaojun, et al. An empirical investigation of green purchase behavior among the young generation ［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2014, 66(3): 528-536.
［30］ Du Shaofu, Zhu Lili, Liang Liang, et al. Emission dependent supply chain and environment policy making in the ‘cap-and-trade’ system ［J］. Energy Policy, 2013, 57(11): 61-67.
［31］ Hamdan S, Cheaitou A. Supplier selection and order allocation with green criteria: An MCDM and multi-objective optimization approach ［J］. Computers and Operations Research, 2017, 81: 282-304.
［32］刘小峰, 盛昭瀚, 杜建国. 产品竞争与顾客选择下的清洁生产技术演化模型［J］. 管理科学, 2013, 26(6): 25-34.Liu Xiaofeng, Sheng Zhaohan Du Jianguo. Evolutionary model of cleaner production technologies under product competition and consumer choice ［J］. Journal of Management Science, 2013, 26(6): 25-34.
［33］盛昭瀚, 张军, 杜建国. 社会科学计算实验理论与应用［M］. 上海: 上海三联书店, 2009.Sheng Zhaohan, Zhang Jun, Du Jianguo. Computational experiments of social science: Theory and application ［M］. Shanghai: Shanghai Sanlian Bookstore, 2009.
［34］赵爱武, 杜建国, 关洪军. 环境税情景下企业环境技术创新模拟［J］. 管理科学, 2016, 29(1): 40-52.Zhao Aiwu, Du Jianguo, Guan Hongjun. Simulation of enterprise environmental technology innovation given the context of environmental tax ［J］. Journal of Management Science, Journal of Management Science, 2016, 29(1): 40-52.
［35］ Basu N, Pryor R, Quint T. ASPEN: A microsimulation model of the economy ［J］. Computational Economics, 1998, 12(3): 223-241.
［36］ North M J, Collier N T, Vos J R. Experiences creating three implementations of the repast agent modeling toolkit ［J］. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation, 2006, 16(1): 1-25.

[1]	蒋媛媛, 罗贺, 吴志伟, 蔡智明, 王国强. 制造企业海外基地采购计划与供应商选择联合优化问题研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(10): 126-137.
[2]	林晓刚, 黄海玲, 李文卓, 林强. 混合销售模式下农产品电商的区块链技术提供策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(10): 259-268.
[3]	王方, 程文鑫, 余乐安, 查锐. 代际更替电子产品的废弃量预测与治理：小数据视角[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(10): 350-360.
[4]	宋明珍, 马腾, 孔令丞, 谢家平. 动力电池梯次利用下风力发电企业储能电站租赁策略选择：容量计费还是两部制收费？[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(9): 135-147.
[5]	王文隆, 何竹云, 张涑贤. 动态视角下生鲜品双渠道供应链保鲜努力与促销努力联合决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(9): 301-311.
[6]	林强, 单镇杰, 李文卓. CVaR条件下考虑授信额度的报童模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(9): 312-324.
[7]	刘旭旺, 王骏嘉, 齐微, 雒兴刚. 考虑参照点效应和价格承诺的平台电商企业竞争定价策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(8): 278-288.
[8]	肖金利, 李佳玲, 高皓, 文凤华. 金字塔股权结构与劳动收入份额[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(8): 50-60.
[9]	潘泽龙, 周国华, 黄超然. 基于IGSA的线性工程施工进度计划优化模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(7): 210-221.
[10]	高尚, 周晶, 罗婷. 考虑公平关切和利他偏好的众包竞赛激励契约设计和选择[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(7): 284-293.
[11]	郑静, 王勇, 陈悦, 宋一民. 网络外部性下考虑用户归属情形的社区团购平台定价策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(7): 305-315.
[12]	林志炳, 郭耿, 陈蕾雯. 考虑需求扰动及零售商公平关切行为的服务供应链决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(7): 316-323.
[13]	王田, 汤寒冰, 施彦丞. 社交型网络拼团：定价、人数和消费者类型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(6): 73-84.
[14]	南江霞, 吴小勇, 张茂军. 区块链赋能的低碳市场制造商产量竞争与碳减排技术合作[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(6): 360-368.
[15]	黄河, 李文平, 徐鸿雁. 政府补贴和成本分担共存时具有社会责任零售商的信息共享研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(6): 265-276.